The Control of Agents’ Expressivity in Interactive Drama

  • Nicolas Szilas
  • Maurizio Mancini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3805)


This paper describes how conversational expressive agents can be used in the context of Interactive Drama. This integration requires some automatic tagging of the generated text, according to the current dramatic situation. Experimental results of the implemented prototype are presented.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bevacqua, E., Mancini, M., Pelachaud, C.: Speaking with Emotions AISB 2004 Convention: Motion, Emotion and Cognition, University of Leeds, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bremond, C.: Logique du récit. Seuil, Paris (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll, N.: Beyond Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crawford, C.: Assumptions underlying the Erasmatron interactive storytelling engine. In: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence, Technical Report FS-99-01. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartmann, B., Mancini, M., Pelachaud, C.: Formational parameters and adaptive prototype instantiation for mpeg-4 compliant gesture synthesis. In: Proceedings of the Computer Animation 2002, p. 111. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelso, M.T., Weyhrauch, P., Bates, J.: Dramatic Presence. TR CMU-CS-92-195, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Towards Integrating Plots and Characters for Inter-active Drama. In: Dautenhahn, K., et al. (eds.) Socially Intelligent Agents, pp. 221–228. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pelachaud, C., Bilvi, M.: Computational model of believable conversational agents. In: Huget, M.P. (ed.) Communication in Multiagent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2650, pp. 300–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poggi, I.: Emotions. In: Un modèle en termes de buts et de croyances. Unpublished seminar, Montreuil, France, July 12 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poggi, I.: Mind markers. In M. Rector, I. Poggi, N.T., ed.: Gestures. Meaning and use. University Fernando Pessoa Press, Oporto, Portugal (2003) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sgouros, N.M.: Dynamic Generation, Management and Resolution of Interactive Plots. Artificial Intelligence 107(1), 29–62 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steedman, M.: Using APML to Specify Intonation. Unpublished Tutorial Paper (2004),
  14. 14.
    Szilas, N.: IDtension: a narrative engine for Interactive Drama. In: Göbel, et al. (eds.) Proc. TIDSE 2003. Frauenhofer IRB Verlag (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szilas, N.: Interactive Drama on Computer: Beyond Linear Narrative. In: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence, Technical Report FS-99-01. AAAI Press, 150-156, Menlo Park (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tan, E.: Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Todorov, T.: Les transformations narratives. Poétiques 3, 322–333 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young, R.M., Riedl, M.O., Branly, M., Jhala, A., Martin, R.J., Saretto, C.J.: An architecture for integrating plan-based behavior generation with interactive game environments. Journal of Game Development 1, 1 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Szilas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maurizio Mancini
    • 1
  1. 1.LINCIUT de MontreuilMontreuilFrance
  2. 2.Department of ComputingMacquarie UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations