Skip to main content

Fast Plagiarism Detection System

  • Conference paper
String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3772))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The large class sizes typical for an undergraduate programming course mean that it is nearly impossible for a human marker to accurately detect plagiarism, particularly if some attempt has been made to hide the copying. While it would be desirable to be able to detect all possible code transformations we believe that there is a minimum level of acceptable performance for the application of detecting student plagiarism. It would be useful if the detector operated at a level that meant for a piece of work to fool the algorithm would require that the student spent a large amount of time on the assignment and had a good enough understanding to do the work without plagiarising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, B.S.: Parameterized Duplication in Strings: Algorithms and an Application to Software Maintenance. SIAM Journal on Computing 26(5), 1343–1362 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, D., Ian Munro, J.: Efficient suffix trees on secondary storage. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joy, M.S., Luck, M.: Plagiarism in programming assignments. IEEE Transactions on Education 42(2), 129–133 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manber, U., Myers, G.: Suffix arrays: a new method for on-line string searches. In: Proceedings of SODA 1990, pp. 319–327. SIAM, Philadelphia (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prechelt, L., Malpohl, G., Phlippsen, M.: JPlag: Finding plagiarisms among a set of programs. Technical report, Fakultat for Informatik, Universitat Karlsruhe (2000), http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~prechelt/Biblio/jplagTR.pdf

  6. Schleimer, S., Wilkerson, D.S., Aiken, A.: Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting. In: Proceedings of SIGMOD 2003, pp. 76–85. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ukkonen, E.: On-line construction of suffix trees. Algorithmica 14, 249–260 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mozgovoy, M., Fredriksson, K., White, D., Joy, M., Sutinen, E. (2005). Fast Plagiarism Detection System. In: Consens, M., Navarro, G. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3772. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29740-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32241-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics