Abstract

Model-driven Architecture (MDA) is a software architecture framework proposed by the Object Management Group OMG. MDA emphasises the importance of modelling in the architectural design of service-based software systems. Ontologies can enhance the modelling aspects here. We present ontology-based transformation and reasoning techniques for a layered, MDA-based modelling approach. Different ontological frameworks shall support domain modelling, architectural modelling and interoperability. Ontologies are beneficial due to their potential to formally define and automate transformations and to allow reasoning about models at all stages. Ontologies are suitable in particular for the Web Services platform due to their ubiquity within the Semantic Web and their application to support semantic Web services.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Object Management Group. MDA Guide V1.0.1. OMG (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Framework (2004) (visited 08/07/2005), http://www.w3.org/2002/ws
  3. 3.
    World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Architecture Definition Document (2003), http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch
  4. 4.
    Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services – Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newcomer, E., Lomow, G.: Understanding SOA with Web Services. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The WS-BPEL Coalition. WS-BPEL Business Process Execution Language for Web Services – Specification Version 1.1 (2004) (visited 08/07/2005), http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-bpel
  7. 7.
    Peltz, C.: Web Service orchestration and choreography: a look at WSCI and BPEL4WS. Web Services Journal 3(7) (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mandell, D.J., McIllraith, S.A.: Adapting BPEL4WS for the Semantic Web: The Bottom-Up Approach to Web Service Interoperation. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 227–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Object Management Group. Ontology Definition Metamodel - Request For Proposal (OMG Document: as/2003-03-40). OMG (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gašević, D., Devedžić, V., Djurić, D.: MDA Standards for Ontology Development – Tutorial. In: International Conference on Web Engineering ICWE 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams, J., Baty, J.: Building a Loosely Coupled Infrastructure for Web Services. In: Proc. International Conference on Web Services ICWS 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allen, R., Garlan, D.: A Formal Basis for Architectural Connection. ACM Transacions on Software Engineering and Methodology 6(3), 213–249 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plasil, F., Visnovsky, S.: Behavior Protocols for Software Components. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering 28(11), 1056–1075 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd edn. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Desai, N., Singh, M.: Protocol-Based Business Process Modeling and Enactment. In: International Conference on Web Services ICWS 2004, pp. 124–133. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kazman, R., Carriere, S.J., Woods, S.G.: Toward a Discipline of Scenario-based Architectural Evolution. Annals of Software Engineering 9(1-4), 5–33 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W3C Semantic Web Activity. Semantic Web Activity Statement (2004) (visited 06/07/2005), http://www.w3.org/2001/sw
  18. 18.
    Daconta, M.C., Obrst, L.J., Klein, K.T.: The Semantic Web. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.: Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 279–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ankolekar, A., Burstein, M., Hobbs, J.R., Lassila, O., Martin, D., McDermott, D., McIlraith, S.A., Narayanan, S., Paolucci, M., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.: DAML-S: Web service description for the semantic web. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 279–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baader, F., McGuiness, D., Nardi, D., Schneider, P.P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rao, J., Küngas, P., Matskin, M.: Logic-Based Web Services Composition: From Service Description to Process Model. In: International Conference on Web Services ICWS 2004, pp. 446–453. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pahl, C.: An ontology for software component matching. In: Pezzé, M. (ed.) FASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2621, pp. 6–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pahl, C., Casey, M.: Ontology Support for Web Service Processes. In: Proc. European Software Engineering Conference and Foundations of Software Engineering ESEC/FSE 2003, ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lara, R., Roman, D., Polleres, A., Fensel, D.: A Conceptual Comparison of WSMO and OWL-S. In: (LJ) Zhang, L.-J., Jeckle, M. (eds.) ECOWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3250, pp. 254–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A Classification and Comparison framework for Software Architecture Description Languages. In: Proceedings European Conference on Software Engineering / International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering ESEC/FSE 1997, pp. 60–76. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Payne, T., Lassila, O.: Semantic Web Services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kong, J., Zhang, K., Dong, J., Song, G.: A Graph Grammar Approach to Software Architecture Verification and Transformation. In: 27th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference COMPSAC 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baresi, L., Heckel, R.: Tutorial Introduction of Graph Transformation: A Software Engineering Perspective. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2505, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gašević, D., Devedžić, V., Damjanović, V.: Analysis of MDA Support for Ontological Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Information Technologies, pp. 55–58 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Djurić, D.: MDA-based Ontology Infrastructure. Computer Science and Information Systems (ComSIS) 1(1), 91–116 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Pahl
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations