The Ontological Lens: Zooming in and out from Genomic to Clinical Level

  • Domenico M. Pisanelli
  • Francesco Pinciroli
  • Marco Masseroli
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3745)


Ontology is the talk of the day in the medical informatics community. Its relevant role in the design and implementation of information systems in health care is now widely acknowledged. In this paper we present two case studies showing ontologies “at work” in the genomic domain and in the clinical context. First we show how ontologies and genomic controlled vocabularies can be effectively applied to help in a genomic approach towards the comprehension of fundamental biological processes and complex cellular patho-physiological mechanisms, and hence in biological knowledge mining and discovery. Subsequently, as far as the clinical context is concerned, we emphasize the relevance of ontologies in order to maintain semantic consistency of patient data in a continuity of care scenario. In conclusion we advocate that a deep analysis of the structure and the concepts present at different granular level – from genes to organs – is needed in order to bridge this different domains and to unify bio-medical knowledge in a single paradigm.


Gene Ontology Fundamental Biological Process Reference Ontology Semantic Consistency Care Scenario 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS 1998, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Available on-line at (Last access June 1, 2005)
  4. 4.
    Available on-line at [PIC].pdf (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  5. 5.
    Kumar, A., Smith, B., Novotny, D.D.: Biomedical Informatics and Granularity, Available on-line at (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  6. 6.
    Schuler, G.D.: Pieces of the puzzle: expressed sequence tags and the catalog of human genes. J. Mol. Med. 75, 694–698 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), UniGene system, Available from (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  8. 8.
    Maglott, D., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K.D., Tatusova, T.: Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Research 33, D54–D58 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Entrez Gene database. Available from (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  10. 10.
    Apweiler, R., Bairoch, A., Wu, C.H., Barker, W.C., Boeckmann, B., Ferro, S., Gasteiger, E., Huang, H., Lopez, R., Magrane, M., Martin, M.J., Natale, D.A., O’Donovan, C., Redaschi, N., Yeh, L.S.: UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 115–119 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    UniProt the universal protein resource. Available from (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  12. 12.
    Kanehisa, M., Goto, S.: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 28(1), 27–30 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes – KEGG. Available from (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  14. 14.
    Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man – OMIM. Available from (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  15. 15.
    Sonnhammer, E.L.L., Eddy, S.R., Durbin, R.: PFAM: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins 28, 405–420 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MGED NETWORK. Ontology Working Group (OWG). Available from (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  17. 17.
    The Gene Ontology Consortium, Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Gen. 25, 25–29 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, B., Williams, J., Schulze-Kremer, S.: The ontology of the gene ontology. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. pp. 609–13 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guffanti, A., Reid, J.F., Alcalay, M., Gyorgy, S.: The meaning of it all: Web-based resources for large-scale functional annotation and visualization of DNA microarray data. Trends in Genetics 18, 589–592 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masseroli, M., Pinciroli, F.: Using Gene Ontology and genomic controlled vocabularies to analyze high-throughput gene lists. To appear on Computers in Biology and Medicine Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Task Force of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. The treatment of heart failure. European Heart J. 18, 736–753 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beale, T.: Archetypes: Constraint-based Domain Models for Future-proof Information System. Available at (Last access: June 1, 2005)
  23. 23.
    Masolo, C., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Wonder Web Deliverable D17. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domenico M. Pisanelli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesco Pinciroli
    • 2
  • Marco Masseroli
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory for Applied OntologyNational Research CouncilRomeItaly
  2. 2.BioMedical Informatics Laboratory, Bioengineering DepartmentPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations