Abstract
More than we realize it, knowledge is often constructed through interactions among people in small groups. The Internet, by allowing people to communicate globally in limitless combinations, has opened enormous opportunities for the creation of knowledge and understanding. A major barrier today is the poverty of adequate groupware. To design more powerful software that can facilitate the building of collaborative knowledge, we need to better understand the nature of group cognition—the processes whereby ideas are developed by small groups. We need to analyze interaction at both the individual and the group unit of analysis in order to understand the variety of processes that groupware should be supporting. This paper will look closely at an empirical example of knowledge being constructed by a small group and suggest implications for groupware design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Shannon, C., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Chicago (1949)
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Interaction Book Company, Edina (1989)
Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Engeström, Y.: Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., Punamäki, R.-L. (eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 19–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)
Heidegger, M.: Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). SUNY Press, Albany (1927/1996)
Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1930/1978)
Bakhtin, M.: Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (V. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press, Austin (1986)
Wessner, M., Pfister, H.-R.: Group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group 2001), Boulder, CO, pp. 24–31 (2001)
Stahl, G., Herrmann, T.: Intertwining perspectives and negotiation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group 1999), Phoenix, AZ, pp. 316–324 (1999), Available at http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/papers/ch07.pdf
Vogel, D., Nunamaker, J., Applegate, L., Konsynski, B.: Group decision support systems: Determinants of success. In: Proceedings of Decision Support Systems (DSS 1987), pp. 118–128 (1987)
Stahl, G.: Groupware goes to school. In: Haake, J.M., Pino, J.A. (eds.) CRIWG 2002. LNCS, vol. 2440, pp. 7–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2002), Available at http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/papers/ch11.pdf
Stahl, G.: Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006), Available at, http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/mit/
Zemel, A., Xhafa, F., Stahl, G.: Analyzing the organization of collaborative math problem-solving in online chats using statistics and conversation analysis. In: Fukś, H., Lukosch, S., Salgado, A.C. (eds.) CRIWG 2005. LNCS, vol. 3706, pp. 271–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Garcia, A., Jacobs, J.B.: The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34(4), 337–367 (1999)
Sacks, H.: Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell, Oxford (1992)
Bruner, J.: Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Wegerif, R.: A dialogical understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan (2005)
Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, Pergamon, pp. 1–16. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1999)
Strijbos, J.-W., Kirschner, P., Martens, R. (eds.): What We Know about CSCL... and Implementing it in Higher Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Cakir, M., Xhafa, F., Zhou, N., Stahl, G.: Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat. In: Proceedings of international conference on AI in Education (AI-Ed 2005), Amsterdam, Netherlands,
Duranti, A.: Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., Zemel, A.: The Video Analyst’s Manifesto (or The Implications of Garfinkel’s Policies for the Development of a Program of Video Analytic Research within the Learning Sciences). In: Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., Derry, S. (eds.) Video Research in the Learning Sciences (2005), Available at http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/publications/journals/manifesto.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stahl, G. (2005). Groups, Group Cognition and Groupware. In: FukĹ›, H., Lukosch, S., Salgado, A.C. (eds) Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use. CRIWG 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3706. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11560296_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11560296_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29110-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32002-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)