Advertisement

Replicators: Transformations to Address Model Scalability

  • Jeff Gray
  • Yuehua Lin
  • Jing Zhang
  • Steve Nordstrom
  • Aniruddha Gokhale
  • Sandeep Neema
  • Swapna Gokhale
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3713)

Abstract

In Model Integrated Computing, it is desirable to evaluate different design alternatives as they relate to issues of scalability. A typical approach to address scalability is to create a base model that captures the key interactions of various components (i.e., the essential properties and connections among modeling entities). A collection of base models can be adorned with necessary information to characterize their replication. In current practice, replication is accomplished by scaling the base model manually. This is a time-consuming process that represents a source of error, especially when there are deep interactions between model components. As an alternative to the manual process, this paper presents the idea of a replicator, which is a model transformation that expands the number of elements from the base model and makes the correct connections among the generated modeling elements. The paper motivates the need for replicators through case studies taken from models supporting different domains.

Keywords

Modeling Language Model Transformation System Integration Modeling Hybrid Language Specific Modeling Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, A., Karsai, G., Lédeczi, Á.: An End-to-End Domain-Driven Software Development Framework. In: Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA) – Domain-driven Track, Anaheim, CA, October 2003, pp. 8–15 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batory, D., Sarvela, J.N., Rauschmeyer, A.: Scaling Step-Wise Refinement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 355–371 (June 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bézivin, J., Jouault, F., Valduriez, P.: On the Need for MegaModels. In: OOPSLA Workshop on Best Practices for Model-Driven Software Development, Vancouver, BC (October 2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Classification of Model Transformation Approaches. In: OOPSLA Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, Anaheim, CA (October 2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwards, G., Deng, G., Schmidt, D., Gokhale, A.S., Natarajan, B.: Model-Driven Configuration and Deployment of Component Middleware Publish/Subscribe Services. In: Karsai, G., Visser, E. (eds.) GPCE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3286, pp. 337–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emerson, M., Sztipanovits, J., Bapty, T.: A MOF-Based Meta-modeling Environment. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 1357–1382 (October 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The FUJABA Toolsuite, http://www.fujaba.com
  8. 8.
    Gokhale, A., Schmidt, D., Natarajan, B., Gray, J., Wang, N.: Model-Driven Middleware. In: Mahmoud, Q. (ed.) Middleware for Communications, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gray, J., Bapty, T., Neema, S., Tuck, J.: Handling Crosscutting Constraints in Domain-Specific Modeling. Communications of the ACM, 87–93 (October 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hatcliff, J., Deng, W., Dwyer, M., Jung, G., Ranganath, V.P.: Cadena: An Integrated Development, Analysis, and Verification Environment for Component-based Systems. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, OR, May 2003, pp. 160–173 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johann, S., Egyed, A.: Instant and Incremental Transformation of Models. In: Automated Software Engineering, Linz, Austria, September 2004, pp. 362–365 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lédeczi, Á., Bakay, A., Maroti, M., Volgyesi, P., Nordstrom, G., Sprinkle, J., Karsai, G.: Composing Domain-Specific Design Environments. IEEE Computer, 44–51 (November 2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, Y., Zhang, J., Gray, J.: A Framework for Testing Model Transformations. In: Model-Driven Software Development, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patrascoiu, O.: Mapping EDOC to Web Services using YATL. In: 8th International IEEE EDOC Conference, Monterey, CA, September 2004, pp. 286–297 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sendall, S., Kozaczynski, W.: Model Transformation – the Heart and Soul of Model-Driven Software Development. IEEE Software, Special Issue on Model Driven Software Development 20(5), 42–45Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shetty, S., Nordstrom, S., Ahuja, S., Yao, D., Bapty, T., Neema, S.: Systems Integration of Large Scale Autonomic Systems using Multiple Domain Specific Modeling Languages. In: Engineering of Autonomic Systems, Greenbelt, MD (April 2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sztipanovits, J., Karsai, G.: Model-Integrated Computing. IEEE Computer, 10–12 (April 1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff Gray
    • 1
  • Yuehua Lin
    • 1
  • Jing Zhang
    • 1
  • Steve Nordstrom
    • 2
  • Aniruddha Gokhale
    • 2
  • Sandeep Neema
    • 2
  • Swapna Gokhale
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer and Information SciencesUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Software Integrated SystemsVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations