Advertisement

Learning Plans with Patterns of Actions in Bounded-Rational Agents

  • Budhitama Subagdja
  • Liz Sonenberg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3683)

Abstract

This paper presents a model of a learning mechanism for situated agents. The learning is described explicitly in terms of plans and conducted as intentional actions within the BDI (Beliefs, Desires, Intentions) agent model. Actions of learning direct the task-level performance towards improvements or some learning goals. The agent is capable of modifying its own plans through a set of actions on the run. The use of domain independent patterns of actions is introduced as a strategy for constraining the search for the appropriate structure of plans. The model is demonstrated to represent Q-learning algorithm, however different variation of pattern can enhance the learning.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Persistence, intention, and commitment. In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 33–69. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hernandez, G., Segrouchini, A.E., Soldano, H.: BDI multiagent learning based on first-order induction of logical decision trees. In: Oshuga, S., Zhong, N., Liu, J., Bradshaw, J. (eds.) Intelligent Agent Technology: Research and Development, World Scientific, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howden, N., Ronnquist, R., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: Jack intelligent agents-summary of an agent infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huber, M.J.: Jam: A BDI-theoretic mobile agent architecture. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Seattle (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ingrand, F., Georgeff, M., Rao, A.: An architecture for real-time reasoning and system control. IEEE Expert 7(6), 34–44 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, Cambridge (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olivia, C., Chang, C.-F., Enguix, C.F., Ghose, A.K.: Casebased bdi agents: an effective approach for intelligent search on the world wide web. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 1999, Spring Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Cyberspace Stanford University, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI agents: From theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), San Francisco (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. In: Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Subagdja, B., Sonenberg, L.: Reactive planning through reflective hypotheses: Towards learning in BDI agents. Submitted for AAMAS (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Budhitama Subagdja
    • 1
  • Liz Sonenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Melbourne 

Personalised recommendations