Advertisement

The Impact of E-Learning on the Use of Campus Instructional Space

  • Tatiana Bourlova
  • Mark Bullen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3583)

Abstract

The use of e-leaning is growing in universities and colleges across North America but these institutions do not fully understand how and in what form it can contribute to their missions, what the indicators of the successful implementation of e-learning would be, and how to assess the changes caused by e-learning. The study approaches e-learning from the institutional perspective, outlining the effects of e-learning on the use of the instructional space on campus.

Keywords

High Education Institution Mixed Mode Distance Education Blend Learn Student Enrolment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ACCULT – Academic Committee for the Creative Use of Learning Technologies (2000). The Creative Use of Learning Technologies. UBC (2005), www.maple.ubc.ca/research/accult/index_accult.html (retrieved March 2005)
  2. 2.
    AUCC Publications (2003). Trends in Higher Education (2005), www.aucc.ca/publications/auccpubs/research/trends/summary_e.html (retrieved March 2005)
  3. 3.
    Bates, A.W.: Managing Technological Change: Strategies for College and University Leaders. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bates, A.W.: National Strategies for E-learning in Post-Secondary Education and Training. In: UNESCO: International Institute for Education and Planning, Paris (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blended Learning Project Final Report for the Academic Year 2003-2004. Online Learning Department. Rochester Institute of Technology (2004) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourlova, T.: The Impact of E-learning on a University Campus. Final project report (2004), http://www.maple.ubc.ca/researc/impact_project.html (retrieved March 2005)
  7. 7.
    CAUT / ACPPU. Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dumaresq, C., Lambert-Maberly, A., Sudmant, W.: University Accessibility and Affordability. PAIR. UBC (2004), www.pair.ubc.ca/studies/tuitafford0304.htm#_Toc64186002 (retrieved July 2004)
  9. 9.
    Fink, I.: Classroom Use and Utilization, Faculty Manager. FAIA (May/June 2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fink, I.: Benchmarking. A new approach to space planning. In: Rose, R. (ed.) Connecting the Dots...the Essence of Planning. The Best of Planning for Higher Education 1997-2003, The Society for College and University Planning (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graduating Students Survey (2000). The Master Report for the Canadian Undergraduate Survey UBC (2004), http://www.pair.ubc.ca/studies/cusc2003.htm (retrieved May 2004)
  12. 12.
    Hanrahan, M., Ryan, M., Duncan, M.: The professional engagement model of academic induction into on-line teaching. International Journal for Academic Development 6(2), 130–142 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartman, J., Dzuiban, C., Moskal, P.: Blended Learning. EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research. Research Bulletin 2004(7) (March 30, 2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hartman, J., Dziuban, C., Moskal, P.: Faculty Satisfaction in ALNs: A Dependent of Independent Variable? In: Sloan Summer ALN Workshops, Illinois, August 16-18 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnston, A.D.: The University Crunch. MakLean’s (November 18, 2002), http://www.macleans.ca/xta-doc2/2002/11/18/Universities2002/75463.shtml (retrieved May 2003)
  16. 16.
    OECD (Organization for economic co-operation and development). E-learning case studies in post-secondary education & training. UBC case study. Centre for educational Research and Innovation (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    PAIR. Planning and Institutional Research. The University of British Columbia Fact Book (2004), http://www.pair.ubc.ca/studies/factbook.htm (retrieved February 2004)
  18. 18.
    Report of the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program (PCEIP). Education Indicators in Canada (2003), www.cesc.ca, www.statcan.ca (retrieved December 2004)
  19. 19.
    Survey of First-Year University Students (2001); Canadian Undergraduate Survey Consortium (CUSC) PAIR. UBC (November 2004), www.pair.ubc.ca (retrieved November 2003)
  20. 20.
    Zemsky, R., Massy, F.: Thwarted Innovation. What Happened to e-learning and Why. A final report for the Weatherstation Project of the Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania in cooperation with the Thomson Corporation (2004), http://www.thelearningalliance.info/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf (retrieved May 2004)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Bourlova
    • 1
  • Mark Bullen
    • 1
  1. 1.Distance Education & Technology, Centre for Managing and Planning Learning EnvironmentsThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations