Abstract
This paper presents an evaluation study that measures the effect of modifying feedback generality in an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) based on Student Models. A taxonomy of the tutor domain was used to group existing knowledge elements into plausible, more general, concepts. Existing student models were then used to measure the validity of these new concepts, demonstrating that at least some of these concepts appear to be more effective at capturing what the students learned than the original knowledge elements. We then trialled an experimental ITS that gave feedback at a higher level. The results suggest that it is feasible to use this approach to determine how feedback might be fine-tuned to better suit student learning, and hence that learning curves are a useful tool for mining student models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167–207 (1995)
Koedinger, K.R., Mathan, S.: Distinguishing qualitatively different kinds of learning using log files and learning curves. In: ITS 2004 Log Analysis Workshop Maceio, Brazil, pp. 39–46 (2004)
Martin, B.: Constraint-Based Modelling: Representing Student Knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Computing 7(2), 30–38 (1999)
Mitrovic, A.: An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web. Artificial Intelligence in Education 13(2-4), 173–197 (2003)
Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., Mayo, M.: Using evaluation to shape ITS design: Results and experiences with SQL-Tutor. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction 12(2-3), 243–279 (2002)
Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B.: The role of domain ontology in knowledge acquisition for ITS. In: Seventh international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceio, Brazil, pp. 207–216 (2004)
Mizoguchi, R., Bourdeau, J.: Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 107–121 (2000)
Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.S.: Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson, J.R. (ed.) Cognitive skills and their acquisition, pp. 1–56. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1981)
Ohlsson, S.: Constraint-Based Student Modeling. In: Greer, J., McCalla, G. (eds.) Student Modeling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction, pp. 167–189. Springer, New York (1994)
Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.E.: Interacting with Inspectable Bayesian Student Models. Artificial Intelligence in Education 14(2), 127–163 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martin, B., Mitrovic, A. (2005). Using Learning Curves to Mine Student Models. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrovic, A. (eds) User Modeling 2005. UM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3538. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27885-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31878-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)