Context-Aware Configuration: A Study on Improving Cell Phone Awareness

  • Ashraf Khalil
  • Kay Connelly
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3554)


As the number of mobile devices we carry grows, the job of managing those devices throughout the day becomes cumbersome. This is especially true for cell phones. Despite the many benefits they provide, cell phones create problems that arise from a mismatch between the user’s context and the cell phone’s behavior. In large part, the mismatch occurs because owners do not remember to frequently update their cell phone configuration according to the current context. It is desirable for mobile devices to automatically configure themselves based on the context of the environment and user preferences.

Given the personal attachment between people and their mobile devices such as cell phones, context-aware automatic configuration may not be the preferred solution for users. We have conducted an in situ experiment to examine the feasibility, effectiveness and people’s reactions to such a solution. Our results show that people prefer automatic configuration over configuring their devices by hand, and they are willing to adopt it in real life. The results also suggest that a hybrid, passive-active, context-aware configuration approach is preferred over a purely passive or active one.


Mobile Phone Mobile Device Cell Phone Ubiquitous Computing Computer Support Cooperative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    REUTERS, Mobile phone users double since 2000 (December 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agre, P.E.: Changing places: Contexts of awareness in computing. Human-Computer Interaction 16(2-4), 177–192 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wellman, B.: Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personalized Networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2), 227–252 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palen, L., Salzman, M., Youngs, E.: Going Wireless: Behavior & Practice of New Mo-bile Phone Users. In: Proceedings of ACM 2000 Conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW 2000), Philadelphia, PA (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monk, A., et al.: Why are Mobile Phones Annoying? Behaviour and Information Technolog 31(1), 33–41 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wadler, J.: The nuisance of overheard calls: Cell phones are everywhere but good manners may not be. New York Times, A41 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lasen, A.: A comparative Study of Mobile Phone Use in London, Madrid and Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei, R., Leung, L.: Blurring public and private behaviors in public space: policy challenges in the use and improper use of the cell phone. Telematics and Informatics 16(1-2), 11–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bautsch, H., et al.: An investigation of mobile phone use: a socio-technical approach (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Briody, D.: Thou shalt learn and abide by the ten commandments of cell phone etiquette, in InfoWorld, p. 59B (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wylie, M.: Cell-phone jammers enforce quiet, but illegally, in Cleveland Plain Dealer (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cell-phone jammers answer prayers of some, Associated Press. Appeared on November 2, editions of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eyrolle, H., Cellier, J.: The effects of interruptions in work activity: Field and laboratory results. Applied Ergonomics 31, 537–543 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Study: All cell phones distract drivers. CNN, August 16 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E.: Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. In: Proceedings of Interact 2001, Tokyo, Japan (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pedersen, E.R.: Calls.calm: Enabling Caller and Callee to Collaborate. In: Proceedings of CHI 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang, J.C., et al.: ConNexus to awarenex: extending awareness to mobile users. In: Proceedings of CHI 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milewshi, A.E., Smith, T.M.: Providing Presence Cues to Telephone Users. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2000, Philadelphia, PA (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nelson, L., Bly, S., Sokoler, T.: Quiet Calls: Talking Silently on Mobile Phones. In: Proceedings of CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grudin, J.: Groupware and Social Dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM 37(1), 92–105 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siewiorek, D., et al.: SenSay: A Context-Aware Mobile Phone. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), New York, NY (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt, A., et al.: Advanced interaction in context. In: Proceedings of First International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing (HUC 1999), Karlsruhe, Germany (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barkhuus, L., Dey, A.K.: Is context-aware computing taking control away from the user? Three levels of interactivity examined. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 149–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Antifakos, S., Schwaninger, A., Schiele, B.: Evaluating the Effects of Displaying Uncertainty in Context-Aware Applications. In: Davies, N., Mynatt, E.D., Siio, I. (eds.) UbiComp 2004. LNCS, vol. 3205, pp. 54–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiser, M.: The Future of Ubiquitous Computing on Campus. Communications of ACM 41(1), 41–42 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Griswold, W.G., et al.: ActiveCampus - Experiments in Community-Oriented Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE Computer 37(10), 73–81 (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burrell, J., et al.: Context-Aware Computing: a test case. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khalil, A., Connelly, K.: Improving Cell Phone Awareness by Using Calendar Information. In: Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 588–600. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen, G., Kotz, D.: A survey of context-aware mobile computing research. Department of Computer Science, Darthmouth CollegeTR2000-381 (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Connelly, K., Khalil, A.: Towards Automatic Device Configuration in Smart Environments. In: Proceedings of UbiSys Workshop (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bellotti, V., Edwards, W.K.: Intelligibility and accountability: human considerations in context aware systems. Human Computer Interaction 16(2-4), 193–212 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dourish, P., Bellotti, V.: Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashraf Khalil
    • 1
  • Kay Connelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations