Advertisement

CLASSIC: Consistent Longitudinal Alignment and Segmentation for Serial Image Computing

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3565)

Abstract

This paper proposes a temporally-consistent and spatially-adaptive longitudinal MR brain image segmentation algorithm, referred to as CLASSIC, which aims at obtaining accurate measurements of rates of change of regional and global brain volumes from serial MR images. The algorithm incorporates image-adaptive clustering, spatiotemporal smoothness constraints, and image warping to jointly segment a series of 3-D MR brain images of the same subject that might be undergoing changes due to development, aging or disease. Morphological changes, such as growth or atrophy, are also estimated as part of the algorithm. Experimental results on simulated and real longitudinal MR brain images show both segmentation accuracy and longitudinal consistency.

Keywords

Fractional Anisotropy Segmentation Result Image Series Neighborhood Size Fuzzy Membership Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bezdek, J., Hall, L., Clarke, L.: Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition. Medical Physics 20, 1033–1048 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pappas, T.: An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 40, 901–914 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Udupa, J., Samarasekera, S.: Fuzzy connectedness and object definition: theory, algorithms and applications in image segmentation. Graph. Models Images Processing 58, 246–261 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandt, M., Bohan, T., Kranmer, L., Fletcher, J.: Estimation of CSF, white and gray matter volumes in hydrocephalic children using fuzzy clustering of MR images. Comput. Med. Imag. Graph. 18, 25–34 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim, K., Prefferbaum, A.: Segmentation of MR brain images into cerebrospinal fluid, white and gray matter. Journal of Comput. Assisted Tomogr. 13, 588–593 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pham, D., Prince, J.: Adaptive fuzzy segmentation of magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 18, 737–752 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, W., Giger, M.: A fuzzy c-mean (FCM) based algorithm for intensity inhomogeneity correction and segmentation of MR images. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2004), Arlington, VA, pp. 1307–1310 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rezaee, M., van der Zwet, P., Lelieveldt, B., van der Geest, R., Reiber, J.: A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 9, 1238–1248 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Resnick, S., Goldszal, A., Davatzikos, C., Golski, S., Kraut, M., Metter, E., Bryan, R., Zonderman, A.: One-year age changes in MRI brain volumes in older adults. Cerebral Cortex 10, 464–472 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bezdek, J., Ehrlich, R., Full, W.: FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers and Geosciences 10, 191–203 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillemaud, R., Brady, M.: Estimating the bias field of MR images. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 20, 57–68 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmed, M., Yamany, S., Mohamed, N., Farag, A., Moriarty, T.: A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 21, 193–199 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liew, A., Leung, S., Lau, W.: Fuzzy image clustering incorporating spatial continuity. IEE Proc. Vis. Image Signal Process. 147, 185–192 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pham, D.: Spatial model for fuzzy clustering. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 84, 285–297 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shen, D., Davatzikos, C.: Measuring temporal morphological changes robustly in brain MR images via 4-D template warping. NeuroImage 21, 1508–1517 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shen, D., Davatzikos, C.: HAMMER: Hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 21, 1421–1439 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nyul, G., Udupa, J., Zhang, X.: New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 19, 143–150 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu, C., Liu, F., Zhu, L., Jiang, T.: Anatomy dependent multi-context fuzzy clustering for separation of brain tissues in mr images. In: 2nd International Workshop on Medial Imaging and Augmented Reality, China, pp. 197–203 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karacali, B., Davatzikos, C.: Simulation of tissue atrophy using a topology preserving transformation model. Submit to IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Biomedical Image Analysis, Department of RadiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations