Advertisement

Evaluation of the Effect of Input Stimuli on the Quality of Orientation Maps Produced Through Self Organization

  • A. Ravishankar Rao
  • Guillermo Cecchi
  • Charles Peck
  • James Kozloski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3540)

Abstract

Self-organized maps have been proposed as a model for the formation of sensory maps in the cerebral cortex. The role of inputs is critical in this process of self-organization. This paper presents a systematic approach to analyzing the relationship between the input ensemble and the quality of self-organization achieved.

We present a method for generating an input stimulus set consisting of images of curved lines. The advantage of this approach is that it allows the user the ability to precisely control the statistics of the input stimuli to visual processing algorithms. Since there is considerable scientific interest in the processing of information in the human visual stream, we specifically address the problem of self-organization of cortical visual areas V1 and V2.

We show that the statistics of the curves generated with our algorithm match the statistics of natural images. We develop a measure of self-organization based on the oriented energy contained in the afferent weights to each cortical unit in the map. We show that as the curvature of the generated lines increases, this measure of self-organization decreases. Furthermore, self-organization using curved lines as stimuli is achieved much more rapidly, as the curve images do not contain as much higher order structure as natural images do.

Keywords

Auditory Cortex Natural Image Weight Matrice Curve Line Input Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bednar, J.A.: Learning to See: Genetic and Environmental Influences on Visual Development. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin (2002), Technical Report AI-TR-02-294Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell, A.J., Sejnowski, T.J.: An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7(6), 1129–1159 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erwin, E., Obermayer, K., Schulten, K.: Models of orientation and ocular dominance columns in the visual cortex: A critical comparison. Neural Computation 7(3), 425–468 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Field, D., Hayes, A., Hess, R.: Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local association field. Vision Research 33(2), 173–193 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N., Levay, S.: Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 278, 377–409 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hyvärinen, A., Hoyer, P.O., Hurri, J.: Extensions of ICA as models of natural images and visual processing, Nara, Japan, pp. 963–974 (April 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics 9(1), 62–66 (1979)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao, A.R., Peck, C.C., Cecchi, G.A., Kozloski, J.R.: Contour completion and figure ground separation using self-organizing cortical maps. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting (October 2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharma, J., Angelucci, A., Sur, M.: Induction of visual orientation modules in auditory cortex. Nature 404, 841–847 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sigman, M., Cecchi, G., Gilbert, C., Magnasco, M.: On a common circle: natural scenes and gestalt rules. PNAS 98(4), 1935–1940 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simoncelli, E.P., Olshausen, B.: Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24, 1193–1216 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu, X.: An efficient antialiasing technique. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 25(4), 143–152 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ravishankar Rao
    • 1
  • Guillermo Cecchi
    • 1
  • Charles Peck
    • 1
  • James Kozloski
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations