Skip to main content

Simulating Cutting Plane Proofs with Restricted Degree of Falsity by Resolution

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3569))

Abstract

Goerdt [Goe91] considered a weakened version of the Cutting Plane proof system with a restriction on the degree of falsity of intermediate inequalities. (The degree of falsity of an inequality written in the form ∑ a i x i + ∑ b i (1 − x i ) ≥ A, a i ,b i  ≥ 0 is its constant term A.) He proved a superpolynomial lower bound on the proof length of Tseitin-Urquhart tautologies when the degree of falsity is bounded by \(\frac{n}{log^2 n+1}\) (n is the number of variables).

In this paper we show that if the degree of falsity of a Cutting Planes proof Π is bounded by d(n) ≤ n/2, this proof can be easily transformed into a resolution proof of length at most |∏| · (d(n)n− 1)64d(n). Therefore, an exponential bound on the proof length of Tseitin-Urquhart tautologies in this system for d(n) ≤ cn for an appropriate constant c > 0 follows immediately from Urquhart’s lower bound for resolution proofs [Urq87].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buss, S., Grigoriev, D., Impagliazzo, R., Pitassi, T.: Linear gaps between degrees for the polynomial calculus modulo distinct primes. JCSS 62, 267–289 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Sasson, E., Wigderson, A.: Short proofs are narrow – resolution made simple. JACM 48(2) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, S.A., Reckhow, R.A.: The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 44(1), 36–50 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dash, S.: Exponential lower bounds on the lengths of some classes of branch-and-cut proofs. IBM Research Report RC22575 (September 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grigoriev, D., Hirsch, E.A., Pasechnik, D.V.: Complexity of semialgebraic proofs. Moscow Mathematical Journal 2(4), 647–679 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Goerdt, A.: The Cutting Plane proof system with bounded degree of falsity. In: Kleine Büning, H., Jäger, G., Börger, E., Richter, M.M. (eds.) CSL 1991. LNCS, vol. 626, pp. 119–133. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Haken, A.: The intractability of resolution. Theoretical Computer Science 39, 297–308 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovász, L., Schrijver, A.: Cones of matrices and set-functions and 0-1 optimization. SIAM J. Optimization 1(2), 166–190 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pudlák, P.: Lower bounds for resolution and cutting plane proofs and monotone computations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62(3), 981–998 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Razborov, A.A.: Lower bounds on the monotone complexity of some boolean functions. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 282, 1033–1037 (1985)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson, J.A.: The generalized resolution principle. Machine Intelligence 3, 77–94 (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Tseitin, G.S.: On the complexity of derivation in the propositional calculus. Zapiski nauchnykh seminarov LOMI 8, 234–259 (1968); English translation of this volume: Consultants Bureau, N.Y., pp. 115–125 (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Urquhart, A.: Hard examples for resolution. JACM 34(1), 209–219 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hirsch, E.A., Nikolenko, S.I. (2005). Simulating Cutting Plane Proofs with Restricted Degree of Falsity by Resolution. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing. SAT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3569. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26276-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31679-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics