Skip to main content

Coopetitive Game, Equilibrium and Their Applications

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Applications in Management (AAIM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3521))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Coopetition has become the current trend of economic activities. Coopetitive game is introduced through the comparison of the characteristics of noncooperative game and cooperative game. Furthermore, the coopetitive game is solved adopting one kind of Minimax theorem. Finally, the Cournot coopetition model is presented as an example, and the equilibrium is compared with Nash equilibrium.

This research was supported by NSF of China(No. 10371094, No.70372050), foundations of Qingdao University and software science foundations of Qingdao city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry, N., Adam, B.: Co-opetition. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S.: Cooperation and Competition among Horizontal Actors in Business Networks. Paper presented at the 6th Work-shop on Interorganizational Research, Oslo, August 23–25 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S.: ”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management 29, 411–426 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deutsch, M.: The relation of conflict. Yale University Press, New Haven (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsch, M.: Fifty years of conflict. In: Festinger, L. (ed.) Retrospection on social psychology, Oxford University Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loebbecke, C., van Fenema, P.C., Powell, P.: Knowledge Transfer Under Coopetition. American Management System, 215–229 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loebbecke, C., van Fenema, P.C.: Towards a Theory of Interorganizational Knowledge Sharing during Coopetition. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Aix-en-Provence, France, pp. 1632–1639 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hausken, K., Stavanger: Cooperation and Between-group Competition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 42, 417–425 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marc, W., Athony, Z.: Farming and cooperation in public games: an experiment with an interior solution. Economic Letters 65, 322–328 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du, D.-Z., Hwang, F.K.: An Approach for Proving Lower Bounds: Solution of Gilbert -Pollak’s Conjecture on Steiner Ratio. In: FOCS, pp. 76–85 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, L., Xu, X. (2005). Coopetitive Game, Equilibrium and Their Applications. In: Megiddo, N., Xu, Y., Zhu, B. (eds) Algorithmic Applications in Management. AAIM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3521. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11496199_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11496199_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26224-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32440-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics