Abstract
In 2001 David Mark and Barry Smith published a study that aimed to establish how non-expert subjects conceptualise geospatial phenomena in the United States of America. This paper contributes to comparing the results from the study performed by David Mark and Barry Smith with a similar study applied to Portuguese non-expert subjects.
In response to a series of questions, differently phrased, 160 non-expert subjects (university students from several parts of Portugal and various academic areas) were asked to give examples of geographical categories such as “Natural earth formation” or “Something that can be portrayed on a map”. The answers were used to statistically count the most mentioned terms. The Portuguese results were compared with those of the United States.
Although Portuguese results differ slightly in the number of items presented, the most mentioned terms match with the United States results.
We are therefore able to derive that the conceptualisation of geographical entities of Portuguese subjects is similar to that of United States subjects, e.g. Portuguese subjects also refer to mostly physical characteristics such as trees and mountains.
At a time when interoperability and ontological studies gain importance in the Geographical Information Systems/Science, this ongoing initiative points out the need of integrating trans-border geographical conceptualisations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gruber, T.: What is an Ontology, available on (2001), http://www-ksl.Stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html
Kuhn, W.: Ontologies in Support of Activities in Geographic Space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 613–631 (2001)
Smith, B., Mark, D.: Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 591–612 (2001)
Battig, W.F., Montague, W.E.: Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories a replication and extension of the Connecticut Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 80, Part 2, 1–46 (1968)
Pires, P., Brox, C.: Measuring semantic differences between expertsánd non-expertsćonceptualisations. In: Published at the GEOPRO 2003 - International workshop semantic processing of spatial data, Mexico City, Mexico (2003)
Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer, Dresden (1999)
Kokla, M., Kavouras, M.: Fusion of top-level and geographical domain ontologies based on context formation and complementarity. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 679–687 (2001)
Mota, L., Bento, J., Botelho, L.: Ontologias de Informação Geográfica. In: Comunicação apresentada ao ESIG 2001, Oeiras, Taguspark (November 2001)
Genesereth, M.R., Nilsson, N.J.: Logical Foundation of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1987)
Mark, D., Turk, A.: Landscape categories in Yindjibarndi:Ontology, Enviroment, and Language. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 28–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Carnap, R.: Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology, Supplement to Meaning and Necessity. In: A study in Semantics and Modal Logic, enlarged edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1956)
Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)
Guarino, N.: Formalizing Ontological Commitments. In: Bishr, Y., Kuhn, W. (eds.) The role of ontology in modelling geospatial features, Münster: Institut für Geoinformatik (1999)
Rodriguez, A., Egenhofer, M.: Determining semantic among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(2), 442–456 (2003)
Smith, B.: Ontology. In: Kim, J., Sosa, E. (eds.) A Companion to Metaphysics, pp. 373–374. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge (1995)
Smith, B., Mark, D.: Ontology and Geographic Kinds. In: Paper presented to the International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH 1998), Vancouver, Canada, July 12-15 (1998)
Smith, B., Mark, D.: Ontology with Human Subjects Testing: An Empirical Investigation of Geographic Categories. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58(2), 245–272 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pires, P. (2005). Geospatial conceptualisation: A Cross-Cultural Analysis on Portuguese and American Geographical Categorisations. In: Spaccapietra, S., Zimányi, E. (eds) Journal on Data Semantics III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11496168_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11496168_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26225-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31551-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)