Bioelectrosynthesis pp 1-14 | Cite as
Electrification of Biotechnology: Status quo
Abstract
Interfacing microbial, enzymatic, and electrochemical transformations has led to the new field of electrobiotechnology. Among the plethora of applications (including electric energy generation via pollutant removal), the synthesis of chemicals and energy carriers (e.g. H2) has sparked great interest. The linked transformation of chemical and electric energy may allow the joint utilization of renewable feedstock and sustainable electricity to gain commodities and fuels. The overall field is now referred to as bioelectrosynthesis and is a focus of this book. Starting with the rationale for using bioelectrosynthesis in a bioeconomy, this chapter provides a brief introduction to the field of electrobiotechnology. Subsequently, the chapter discusses the framework for bioelectrosynthesis, which is based on enzymes as well as microorganisms, and provides a definition of bioelectrosynthesis. The chapter concludes with a short overview on the history of the field.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Bioelectrotechnology Electroenzymatic synthesis Electrobiotechnology Microbial electrosynthesis Microbial fuel cellsNotes
Acknowledgements
We are obliged to all authors and referees that contributed to this book, especially the members of our working groups who shouldered the load.
References
- 1.Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (2015) Chemicals 2035 – gearing up for growth how Europe’s chemical industry can gain traction in a tougher world. https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_tab_chemicals_2035_20150521.pdf
- 2.Gulliver JS (2012) Transport and fate of chemicals in the environment - selected entries from the encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 3.Sillanpää M, Ncibi C (2017) A sustainable bioeconomy - the green industrial revolution. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- 4.Sydow A et al (2014) Electroactive bacteria—molecular mechanisms and genetic tools. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(20):8481–8495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Krieg T et al (2014) Reactor concepts for bioelectrochemical syntheses and energy conversion. Trends Biotechnol 32(12):645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Schröder U, Harnisch F, Angenent LT (2015) Microbial electrochemistry and technology: terminology and classification. Energy Environ Sci 8(2):513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Logan BE (2008) Microbial fuel cells. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 8.Scott K, Yu EH (2015) Microbial electrochemical and fuel cells. Woodhead Publishing, SawstonGoogle Scholar
- 9.Rasmussen M, Abdellaoui S, Minteer SD (2016) Enzymatic biofuel cells: 30 years of critical advancements. Biosens Bioelectron 76:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Minteer SD, Liaw BY, Cooney MJ (2007) Enzyme-based biofuel cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(3):228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hiegemann H et al (2016) An integrated 45L pilot microbial fuel cell system at a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Bioresour Technol 218:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Logan BE (2010) Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(6):1665–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mu Y et al (2011) Dehalogenation of iodinated X-ray contrast media in a bioelectrochemical system. Environ Sci Technol 45(2):782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wang A-J et al (2011) Efficient reduction of nitrobenzene to aniline with a biocatalyzed cathode. Environ Sci Technol 45(23):10186–10193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pous N et al (2015) Monitoring and engineering reactor microbiomes of denitrifying bioelectrochemical systems. RSC Adv 5(84):68326–68333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lu L et al (2014) Microbial metabolism and community structure in response to bioelectrochemically enhanced remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):4021–4029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gregory KB, Lovley DR (2005) Remediation and recovery of uranium from contaminated subsurface environments with electrodes. Environ Sci Technol 39(22):8943–8947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kristiawan M (2017) Integration of basic knowledge models for the simulation of cereal foods processing and properties. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_10 Google Scholar
- 19.Cao X et al (2009) A new method for water desalination using microbial desalination cells. Environ Sci Technol 43(18):7148–7152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Turner AP (2013) Biosensors: sense and sensibility. Chem Soc Rev 42(8):3184–3196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Guo W et al (2017) Synergizing 13C metabolic flux analysis and metabolic engineering for biochemical production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Meng D-C, Chen G-Q (2017) Synthetic biology of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wagemann K, Tippkötter N (2017) Biorefineries: a short introduction. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_4 Google Scholar
- 24.De Tissera S et al (2017) Syngas biorefinery and syngas utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_5 Google Scholar
- 25.Rais D, Zibek S (2017) Biotechnological and biochemical utilization of lignin. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_6 Google Scholar
- 26.Kosman J, Juskowiak B (2017) Bioanalytical application of peroxidase-mimicking DNAzymes: status and challenges. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_7 Google Scholar
- 27.Rouleau S et al (2017) RNA G-Quadruplexes as key motifs of the transcriptome. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_8 Google Scholar
- 28.Özilgen M (2017) How to decide on modeling details: risk and benefit assessment. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Ahmad MH et al (2017) Fluorescence spectroscopy for the monitoring of food processes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Singh N, Herzer S (2017) Downstream processing technologies/capturing and final purification: opportunities for innovation, change, and improvement. A review of downstream processing developments in protein purification. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Anastas PT, Warner JC (1998) Green chemistry: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 32.Nevin KP et al (2010) Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds. MBio 1(2):e00103–e00110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Ni Y, Holtmann D, Hollmann F (2014) How green is biocatalysis? To calculate is to know. ChemCatChem 6(4):930–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Potter MC (1911) Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proc R Soc Lond B 84:260–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Schröder U (2011) Discover the possibilities: microbial bioelectrochemical systems and the revival of a 100-year-old discovery. J Solid State Electrochem 15(7):1481–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Cohen B (1931) The bacterial culture as electrical half-cell. J Bacteriol 21:18–19Google Scholar
- 37.Canfield JH, Goldner BH (1964) Research on applied bioelectrochemistry. NASA Technical Report Magna Corporation, Anaheim, p 127Google Scholar
- 38.Ellis GE, Sweeny EE (1963) Biochemical fuel cells. In: NASA Technical Report The Marquardt CorporationGoogle Scholar
- 39.Wilkinson S, Campbell C (1996) Green bug robots - renewable environmental power for miniature robots. In: Proceedings of 4th IASTED international conference, robotics and manufacturing, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
- 40.Kim B et al (2001) A biofuel cell using wastewater and active sludge for wastewater treatment. International patent: WO0104061Google Scholar
- 41.Hongo M, Iwahara M (1979) Application of electro-energizing method to l-glutamic acid fermentation. Agric Biol Chem 43(10):2075–2081Google Scholar
- 42.Ghosh B, Zeikus J (1987) Electroenergization for control of hydrogen transformation in acetone butanol fermentations. In: Abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society. Amer Chemical Soc 1155 16TH St, NW, Washington, DC 20036Google Scholar
- 43.Emde R, Schink B (1990) Enhanced propionate formation by Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. freudenreichii in a three-electrode amperometric culture system. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(9):2771–2776PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 44.Villano M et al (2010) Bioelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to CH4 via direct and indirect extracellular electron transfer by a hydrogenophilic methanogenic culture. Bioresour Technol 101(9):3085–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Heineman WR, Jensen WB (2006) Leland C. Clark Jr. (1918–2005). Biosens Bioelectron 21(8):1403–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Guilbault GG, Montalvo Jr JG (1969) Urea-specific enzyme electrode. J Am Chem Soc 91(8):2164–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Wienkamp R, Steckhan E (1982) Indirect electrochemical regeneration of NADH by a Bipyridinerhodium (I) complex as electron-transfer agent. Angew Chem Int Ed 21(10):782–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar