Skip to main content

Cooperation and Group Utility

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1757))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an definition of cooperation to shared plans that takes into account the benefit of the whole group, where the group’s benefit is computed by considering also the consequences of an agent’s choice in terms of the actions that the other members of the group will do. In addition, the members of a group consider whether to adopt the goals of their partners: an agent should adopt these goals only when the adoption results in an increase of the group’s benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ardissono, L., Boella, G.: An agentmodel for NL dialog interfaces. In: Giunchiglia, F. (ed.) AIMSA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1480, pp. 14–27. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardissono, L., Boella, G., Lesmo, L.: An agent architecture for NL dialog modeling. In: Proc. Second Workshop on Human-Computer Conversation, Bellagio, Italy (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ardissono, L., Boella, G., Lesmo, L.: Plan based agent architecture for interpreting natural language dialogue. To appear in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.J., Pollack, M.E.: Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4, 349–355 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carberry, S.: Plan Recognition in Natural LanguageDialogue. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R.: Limits of strategic rationality for agents and m-a systems. In: Proc. of 4th Model Age workshop on formal models of agents, Pontignano (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: From task delegation to role delegation. In: Lenzerini, M. (ed.) AI*IA 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1321. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Deliberate normative agents: Principles and architecture. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Confirmation and joint action. In: Proc. 12th IJCAI, Sydney, pp. 951–957 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doyle, J.: Rationality and its roles in reasoning. Computational Intelligence 8, 376–409 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Grosz, B., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence 86(2), 269–357 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Haddawy, P., Hanks, S.: Utility models for goal-directed, decision-theoretic planners. Computational Intelligence 14, 392–429 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hogg, L., Jennings, N.: Variable sociability in agent-based decision making. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J.: Cooperative problem solving. Journal of Logic and Computation (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jennings, N.R.: Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multiagent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 223–250 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jennings, N.R., Campos, J.R.: Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents. Proc. IEE Proceedings on Software Engineering 144(1), 11–25 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lesser, V.R.: A retrospective view of FA/C distributed problem solving. IEEE Trans. on Systems Man and Cybernetics 21, 1347–1363 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Deliberation and intentions. In: Proc. of 7th Conference on Uncertainity in Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7, 83–124 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner, T., Lesser, V.: Relating quantified motivations for organizationally situated agents. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Xuan, P., Lesser, V.R.: Incorporating uncertainty in agent commitments. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boella, G., Damiano, R., Lesmo, L. (2000). Cooperation and Group Utility. In: Jennings, N.R., Lespérance, Y. (eds) Intelligent Agents VI. Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. ATAL 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1757. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10719619_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10719619_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67200-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46467-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics