Skip to main content

RPO Constraint Solving Is in NP

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1584))

Abstract

A new decision procedure for the existential fragment of ordering constraints expressed using the recursive path ordering is presented. This procedure is nondeterministic and checks whether a set of constraints is solvable over the given signature, i.e., the signature over which the terms in the constraints are defined. It is shown that this non-deterministic procedure runs in polynomial time, thus establishing the membership of this problem in the complexity class NP for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Comon, H.: Solving inequations in term algebras. In: Proc. 5th IEEE Symp. Logic in Computer Science (LICS), Philadelphia (June 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Comon, H., Treinen, R.: The first-order theory of lexicographic path orderings is undecidable. Theoretical Computer Science 176 (April 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dershowitz, N.: Orderings for term-rewriting systems. Theoretical Computer Science 17(3), 279–301 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dershowitz, N.: Termination of rewriting. Journal of Symbolic Computation 3(1), 69–115 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dershowitz, N., Jouannaud, J.-P.: Rewrite systems. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 243–309. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ganzinger, H., Nieuwenhuis, R., Nivela, P.: The Saturate System (1995), Software and documentation available from: http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de

  7. Hsiang, J., Rusinowitch, M.: On word problems in equational theories. In: Ottmann, T. (ed.) ICALP 1987. LNCS, vol. 267, pp. 54–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jouannaud, J.-P., Okada, M.: Satisfiability of systems of ordinal notations with the subterm ordering is decidable. In: Leach Albert, J., Monien, B., Rodríguez-Artalejo, M. (eds.) ICALP 1991. LNCS, vol. 510, pp. 455–468. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kapur, D., Narendran, P., Sivakumar, G.: A path ordering for proving termination of term rewriting systems. In: Nivat, M., Floyd, C., Thatcher, J., Ehrig, H. (eds.) CAAP 1985 and TAPSOFT 1985. LNCS, vol. 185, pp. 173–187. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapur, D., Sivakumar, G.: Maximal Extensions of Simplification Orderings. In: Thiagarajan, P.S. (ed.) FSTTCS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1026. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirchner, C., Kirchner, H., Rusinowitch, M.: Deduction with symbolic constraints. Revue Française d’Intelligence Artificielle 4(3), 9–52 (1990) (Special issue on automatic deduction)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnamoorthy, M.S., Narendran, P.: Note on recursive path ordering. TCS 40, 323–328 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lescanne, P.: On the recursive decomposition ordering with lexicographical status and other related orderings. J. of Automated Reasoning 6(1), 39–49 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieuwenhuis, R.: Simple LPO constraint solving methods. Inf. Process. Lett. 47(2), 65–69 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Nieuwenhuis, R., Rubio, A.: Theorem proving with ordering constrained clauses. In: Kapur, D. (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607, pp. 477–491. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Plaisted, D.: A recursively defined ordering for proving termination of term rewriting systems. Technical Report R-78-943, U. of Illinois, Dept of Computer Science (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steinbach, J.: Extensions and comparison of simplification orderings. In: Dershowitz, N. (ed.) RTA 1989. LNCS, vol. 355, pp. 434–448. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Narendran, P., Rusinowitch, M., Verma, R. (1999). RPO Constraint Solving Is in NP. In: Gottlob, G., Grandjean, E., Seyr, K. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1584. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10703163_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10703163_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65922-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48855-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics