Skip to main content

Abstract

A central tenet of the Hippocratic oath is the injunction to do no harm. Patients attend physicians trusting that our knowledge is sufficient and our discretion complete, but above all else, that they will be treated with empathy and judiciousness. If we are to avoid doing harm we must recognize that patients have needs which encompass both the physical and psychological realms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Farrell SA. A triage approach to the investigation and management of urinary incontinence in women. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1998;20:1153–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wall LL, DeLancey JOL. The politics of prolapse: a revisionist approach to disorders of the pelvic floor in women. Int Urogynecol J 1993;4:304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiskin AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL. The incidence of genital prolapse following the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drutz HP, Farrell SA, Mainprize TC. Guidelines for the evaluation of genuine stress incontinence prior to primary surgery. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1997;19:633–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCarthy T. Medical history and physical examination. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE, editors. Urogynecology and Urodynamics — Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins, 1991; 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl IA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Qual Life Res 1994;3:291–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierson CA. Pad testing, nursing interventions and urine loss appliances. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE editors. Urogynecology and Urodynamics — Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins, 1991; 209–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen JK, Neilsen Jr FR, Ostergard DR. The role of patient history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:904–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fantl JA, Wyman JF, Anderson RL, Matt DW, Bump RC. Postmenopausal urinary incontinence: comparison between non-estrogen supplement and estrogen supplement women. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:823–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson PD, Barker G, Barnard RJ. Steroid hormone receptors in the female lower urinary tract. Urol Int 1984;39:5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatia NN, Bergman A, Karram MM. Effects of estrogen on urethral function in women with urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baden WF, Walker TR. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972;15:1048–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beecham CT. Classification of vaginal relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:957–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskow P, Shull BL, Smith ARB. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobak WC, Rosenberger K, Walters MD. Inter observer variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 1996;7:121–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:568–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Benson JT. Vaginal approach to cystocele repair. In: Benson JT, editor. Female Pelvic Floor Disorders: Investigation and Management. New York, 1992; 289–94.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schüssler B. Aims of pelvic floor evaluation. In: Schüssler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S, editors. Pelvic Floor Re-education. London: Springer-Verlag, 1994; 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laycock J. Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schüssler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S, editors. Pelvic Floor Re-education, London: Springer-Verlag, 1994; 42–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karram MM. Lower urinary tract infection. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE, editors. Urogynecology and Urodynamics: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1991; 306–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farrell, S.A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of the Pelvis. In: Drutz, H.P., Herschorn, S., Diamant, N.E. (eds) Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-238-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-238-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-238-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics