Skip to main content

Customizable Isolation in Transactional Workflow

  • Conference paper
Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications

Summary

In Workflow Management Systems (WFMSs) safety of execution is a main need of more and more business processes and transactional workflows are real needs inside enterprizes. In previous works, transactional models consider mainly atomicity as the main issue regarding long term transactions. It rarely consider the fact that many processes may run concurrently and thus access and update the same data. Usually, the main isolation item is the data on which we apply locking approaches and this attitude don’t worry about process dimension. In this work we study more precisely what are the real isolation needs in workflow environment. To realize these needs, we define “Isolation Spheres” inspired from “spheres of control” proposed by C. T. Davies to make a separation of concerns between workflow design and transactional properties specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansi x3.135-1992, american national standard for information systems — database language-sql. November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. M. P. Van Der Aalst, A. H. M. Ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases, 14(1):5–51, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hal Berenson, Phil Bernstein, Jim Gray, Jim Melton, Elizabeth O’Neil, and Patrick O’Neil. A critique of ansi sql isolation levels. In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 1–10. ACM Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wijnand Derks, Juliane Dehnert, Paul Grefen, and Willem Jonker. Customized atomicity specification for transactional workflow. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Cooperative Database Systems for Advanced Applications (CODAS’01), pages 140–147. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles T. Davies Jr. Data processing spheres of control. IBM Systems Journal 17(2):179–198, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Randi Karlsen. Supporting partial isolation in flat transaction. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 698–711. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nick Russell, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, David Edmond, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Workflow data patterns. Technical Report FIT-TR-2004-01, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guabtni, A., Charoy, F., Godart, C. (2006). Customizable Isolation in Transactional Workflow. In: Konstantas, D., Bourrières, JP., Léonard, M., Boudjlida, N. (eds) Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-152-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-152-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-151-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-152-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics