Skip to main content

Interoperability through integrating Semantic Web Technology, Web Services, and Workflow Modeling

  • Conference paper

Summary

A number of technologies are mentioned under the rubric of “The Semantic Web”, but good overviews of these technologies with an eye toward practical applications are scarce. Moreover, much of the early focus in this field has been on the development of representation languages for static conceptual information, while there has been less emphasis on how to make semantic web applications practically useful in the context of knowledge work. To achieve this, a better coupling is needed between ontology, service descriptions and workflow modeling. This paper reviews all the basic technologies involved in this, and outlines what can be achieved by merging them in the context of real world workflow descriptions.

Keywords

  • Business Process
  • Service Description
  • Object Management Group
  • Platform Specific Model
  • Springer LNCS

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-152-0_14
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-84628-152-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. The Semantic Web., Scientific American, 2001, May

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daconta, M.C., Orbst, L.J., Smith, K.T The Semantic Web, Wiley, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grigoris, A. & v. Harmelen, F. Web Ontology Language: OWL, in Handbook On Ontologies, Eds. International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, 2004, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  4. McGuiness, D. L. Ontologies Come of Age, in Spinning the Semantic Web, Fensel, D., Hendler, J., Lieberman, H. Wahlster, W, Eds., MIT Press, 2003, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Staab, S. & Studer R., Handbook On Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  6. OWL Web Ontology LanguageUse Cases and Requirements, 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/, Accessed Aug. 23, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jøgensen, H. D., 2004, Interactive Process Models, PhD-thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, ISBN 82-471-6203-2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bandinelli, S., Fuggetta, A., Lavazza, L., Loi, M., and Picco, G.P. Modeling and Improving an Industrial Software Process, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 21, no. 5, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Derniame, J. C. Software Process: Principles, Methodology and Technology, LNCS 1500, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brathaug, T. A., and Evjen, T. A. Enterprise Modeling, STF 38 A96302, 1996, Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, M. S. and Gruninger, M. Enterprise Modeling, AI Magazine, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ambriola, V., Conradi, R., and Fuggetta, A. Assessing Process-Centered Software Engineering Environments, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Metho, 6,3, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  13. WfMC Workflow Handbook 2001, Workflow Management Coalition, Lighthouse Point, Florida, USA, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlsen, S Conceptual Modeling and Composition of Flexible Workflow Models, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conradi, R. and Jaccheri, M. L. Process Modelling Languages, in Software Process: Principles, Methodology and Tech, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer LNCS 1500, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., and Over, J. Process Modeling, Communications of the ACM, 35,9, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  17. Green, P. and Rosemann, M. Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation, Information Systems, 25,3, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lei, Y. and Singh, M. P. A. A Comparison of Workflow Metamodels, in ER Workshop on Behaivoral Modeling, Eds., Springer LNCS 1565, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bolcer, G. and Kaiser, G. SWAP: Leveraging the Web to Manage Workflow, IEEE Internet Computing, 3,1, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  20. OMG Workflow Management Facility v. 1.2, OMG, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  21. WfMC Workflow Management Coalition, Interface 1: Process Definition Interch, Draft 5.0, Workflow Management Coalition, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arkin, A. Business Process Modeling Language-BPML 1.0 Working Draft, BPML.org, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scheer, A.W. and Nuttgens, M., ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management, in Business Process Management, W. v.d. Aalst, J. Desel, and A. Oberweis, Eds., Springer LNCS 1806, 2000, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aalst, W. M. P. v. d. Formalization and Verification of Event-driven Process Chains, Information and Software Technology, 41,10, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Loos, P. and Allweyer, T. Process Orientation and Object Orientation-An Approach for Integrating UM, University of Saarland, Germany, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  26. Workflow Process Definition Interface-XML Process Definition Language, 2002, http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1025_10_xpdl,(Aug. 19, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Krogstie, J. Integrating Enterprise and IS-development Using a Model-Driven Approach. in 13th International Conference on Information Systems Development. 2004. Vilnius, Lithuania: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lillehagen, F., 1999, Visual extended enterprise engineering embedding knowledge management, systems engineering and work execution, Proceedings of IEMC’ 99, IFIP International Enterprise Modelling Conference, Verdal, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haake, J. M., and Wang, W., 1997, Flexible support for business processes: Extending cooperative hypermedia with process support, Proceedings of GROUP’ 97, Phoenix, Arizona USA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kuntz, J. C., Christiansen, T. R., Cohen, G. P., Jin, Y., and Levitt, R. E., 1998, The virtual design team: A computational simulation model of project organizations, Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, no. 11

    Google Scholar 

  31. Krogstie, J., and Jøgensen, H. D., 2004, Interactive models for supporting networked organizations. Proceedings of CAiSE’ 2004, June 9–11, Latvia, Riga

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krogstie, J., Veres, C., Sindre, G. (2006). Interoperability through integrating Semantic Web Technology, Web Services, and Workflow Modeling. In: Konstantas, D., Bourrières, JP., Léonard, M., Boudjlida, N. (eds) Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-152-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-152-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-151-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-152-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)