Skip to main content
  • 775 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vastag B. Merits of embryo screening debated. JAMA 2004;291:927–927.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verlinsky Y, Munné S, Cohen J., et al. Over a decade of preimplantation genetic diagnosis experience: A multicenter report. Fertil Steril 2004;82:292–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gleicher N. Editorial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Plachot M, Cohen J. Regulations for PGD in France. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Menezo VJR, Frydman R, Frydman N. PGD in France. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:7–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill B, Li M. What regulation for PGD? J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:11–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feichtinger W. Preimplantation Diagnosis: A European clinician’s point of view. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:15–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takeshita N, Kubo H. Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis: How to control PGD. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benagiano P, Gianaroli L. The new Italian IVF legislation. Reprod BioMed Online 2004;9:117–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. PGDIS. Guidelines for good PGD practice. Reprod BioMed Online 2004;9:430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards RG. Ethics of PGD: Thoughts on the consequences of HLA typing in embryos. Reprod BioMed Online 2004;9:222–224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simpson JL. Celebrating preimplantation genetic diagnosis of p53 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Reprod BioMed Online 2001;3:2–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cram D. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for familial cancer. Reprod BioMed Online 2001;3:3–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Towner D, Loewy RS. Ethics of preimplantation diagnosis for a woman destined to develop early-onset Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2002;287:1038–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Damewood MD. Ethical implications of a new application of preimplantation diagnosis. JAMA 2001;285:3143–3144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fost NC. Conception for donation. JAMA 2004;291:2125–2126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Most Americans find genetic testing of embryos acceptable in conceiving a child who will donate tissue to save an older sibling. ASRM Bull May 6, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Schoolcraft W, Strom C, Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching. JAMA 2001;285:3130–3133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Sharapova T, Morris R, Tharanissi M, Kuliev A. Preimplantation HLA typing. JAMA 2004;291:2079–2085.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fasth A, Wahlstrom J. Preimplantation testing to produce an HLA-matched donor infant. JAMA 2004;292:803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner JE, Kahn JP, Wolf SM, Lipton JM. Preimplantation testing to produce an HLA-matched donor infant. JAMA 2004;292:803–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Orfali KA, Ohene-Abuakwa Y, Ball SE. Diamond Blackfan anemia in the UK: Clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Br J Haematol 2004;125:243–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weimann JM, Johansson CB, Trejo A, Blau HM. Stable reprogrammed heterokaryons form spontaneously in Purkinje neurons after bone marrow transplantation. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:959–966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Ethics Committee: Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril 2001;75:861–864.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson JA. Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: The ethical debate. Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2003;18:465–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malpani A, Malpani A, Modi D. The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in sex selection for family balancing in India. Reprod BioMed Online 2001;4:16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kilani Z, Haj Hassan L. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis at the Farah Hospital. Reprod BioMed Online 2002;4:68–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Ethical, Social, and Legal Issues. In: Practical Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-139-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-139-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-920-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-139-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics