Advertisement

Clinical Rectal Compliance Measurement

  • Robert D. Madoff
  • Andrew A. Shelton

Conclusions

The concept of rectal compliance as a determining factor for rectal function is appealing. However, several important obstacles must be overcome. First, consensus must be reached on what the term “compliance” means; is it a measure of the viscoelastic properties of the rectal wall, or does it refer to the active and passive elements that define distensibility of an innervated, muscular organ? Second, the overlapping effects of rectal compliance and rectal capacity need to be sorted out. Third, agreement is needed as to the correct technique to measure compliance, and standardized equipment and protocols must be adopted. Once these steps have been taken, we will be in a better position to understand exactly how compliance affects rectal behavior, both in health and in disease.

Keywords

Irritable Bowel Syndrome Rectal Wall Anorectal Function Rectal Balloon Rectal Compliance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Duthie HL. Dynamics of the rectum and anus. Clin Gastroenterol. 1975;4:467–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hallbook O, Pahlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, and Sjodahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg. 1996;224:58–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ho YH, Tan M, and Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1996;83:978–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mantyh CR, Hull TL, and Fazio VW. Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:37–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kendall GP, Thompson DG, Day SJ, and Lennard-Jones JE. Inter-and intraindividual variation in pressure-volume relations of the rectum in normal subjects and patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 1990;31:1062–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prior A, Maxton DG, and Whorwell PJ. Anorectal manometry in irritable bowel syndrome: differences between diarrhea and constipation predominant subjects. Gut. 1990;31:458–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun WM, Read NW, and Donnelly TC. Anorectal function in incontinent patients with cerebrospinal disease. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:1372–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nordenbo AM, Andersen JR, and Andersen JT. Disturbances of ano-rectal function in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 1996;243:445–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeoh EK, Russo A, Botten R, et al. Acute effects of therapeutic irradiation for prostatic carcinoma on anorectal function. Gut. 1998;43:123–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iwamoto T, Nakahara S, Mibu R, Hotokezaka M, Nakano H, and Tanaka M. Effect of radiotherapy on anorectal function in patients with cervical cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:693–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Varma JS, Smith AN, and Busuttil A. Correlation of clinical and manometric abnormalities of rectal function following chronic radiation injury. Br J Surg. 1985;72:875–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S, Fujioka M, and Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg. 1980;67:655–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith AN, Varma JS, Binnie NR, and Papachrysostomou M. Disordered colorectal motility in intractable constipation following hysterectomy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1361–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plusa SM, Charig JA, Balaji V, Watts A, and Thompson MR. Physiological changes after Delorme’s procedure for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1475–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sorensen M, Rasmussen OO, Tetzschner T, and Christiansen J. Physiological variation in rectal compliance. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1106–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rasmussen O, Christensen B, Sorensen M, Tetzschner T, and Christiansen J. Rectal compliance in the assessment of patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:650–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alstrup NI, Skjoldbye B, Rasmussen OO, Christensen NE, and Christiansen J. Rectal compliance determined by rectal endosonography. A new application of endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:32–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madoff RD, Orrom WJ, Rothenberger DA, and Goldberg SM. Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990;5:37–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krogh K, Ryhammer AM, Lundby L, Gregersen H, and Laurberg TS. Comparison of methods used for measurement of rectal compliance. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toma TP, Zighelboim J, Phillips SF, and Talley NJ. Methods for studying intestinal sensitivity and compliance: in vitro studies of balloons and a barostat. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1996;8:19–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whitehead WE and Delvaux M. Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rao GN, Drew PJ, Monson JR, and Duthie GS. Incremental elastic modulus—a challenge to compliance. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:33–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rao GN. Evaluation of rectal dynamics and viscoelasticity in health and disease [MD thesis]. University of Hull; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gregersen H and Kassab G. Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1996;8:277–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dall FH, Jorgensen CS, Houe D, Gregersen H, and Djurhuus JC. Biomechanical wall properties of the human rectum. A study with impedance planimetry. Gut. 1993;34:1581–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Varma JS and Smith AN. Reproducibility of the proctometrogram. Gut. 1986;27:288–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Comroe JH. Physiology of respiration: An introductory text. Chicago (IL): Year Book Medical Publishers; 1974.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hallbook O, Nystrom PO, and Sjodahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:332–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thayer ML, Madoff RD, Jacobs DM, and Bubrick MP. Comparative intrinsic and extrinsic compliance characteristics of S, J, and W ileoanal pouches. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:404–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bharucha AE, Hubmayr RD, Ferber IJ, and Zinsmeister AR. Viscoelastic properties of the human colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G459–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao SS, Read NW, Davison PA, Bannister JJ, and Holdsworth CD. Anorectal sensitivity and responses to rectal distention in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:1270–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, Sloots CE, Poen AC, Cuesta MA, and Meuwissen SG. Rectal compliance as a routine measurement: extreme volumes have direct clinical impact and normal volumes exclude rectum as a problem. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1732–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Loening-Baucke V, Metcalf AM, and Shirazi S. Anorectal manometry in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84:892–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, and Meuwissen SG. Rectal visceral sensitivity in healthy volunteers: influences of gender, age and methods. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2000;12:361–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lagier E, Delvaux M, Vellas B, et al. Influence of age on rectal tone and sensitivity to distension in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1999;11:101–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salvioli B, Bharucha AE, Rath-Harvey D, Pemberton JH, and Phillips SF. Rectal compliance, capacity, and rectoanal sensation in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2158–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gosselink MJ, Hop WC, and Schouten WR. Rectal compliance in females with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:971–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Steens J, Van Der Schaar PJ, Penning C, Brussee J, and Masclee AA. Compliance, tone and sensitivity of the rectum in different subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:241–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suzuki H and Fujioka M. Rectal pressure and rectal compliance in ulcerative colitis. Jpn J Surg. 1982;12:79–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Roe AM, Bartolo DC, and Mortensen NJ. Diagnosis and surgical management of intractable constipation. Br J Surg. 1986;73:854–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pedersen IK, Christiansen J, Hint K, Jensen P, Olsen J, and Mortensen PE. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1986;204:133–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Oettle GJ and Heaton KW. “Rectal dissatisfaction” in the irritable bowel syndrome. A manometric and radiological study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986;1:183–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Allan A, Ambrose NS, Silverman S, and Keighley MR. Physiological study of pruritus ani. Br J Surg. 1987;74:576–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Madoff
    • 1
  • Andrew A. Shelton
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Colorectal Surgery, Stanford University School of MedicineStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations