Advertisement

Managing Functional Problems Following Dynamic Graciloplasty

  • Cornelius G.M.I. Baeten
  • Mart J. Rongen

Keywords

Motor Unit Fecal Incontinence Functional Problem Gracilis Muscle Implantable Pulse Generator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, and Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg. 1952;135(6):853–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pette D. Fiber transformation and fiber replacement in chronically stimulated muscle. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:S299–S305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baeten C, Spaans F, and Fluks A. An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31(2):134–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konsten J, Baeten CG, Havenith MG, and Soeters PB. Morphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(6):559–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mander BJ, Wexner SD, Williams NS, Bartolo DC, Lubowski DZ, Oresland T, et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Br J Surg. 1999;86(12):1543–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, and Cavina E. Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(9):897–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mavrantonis C, Billotti VL, and Wexner SD. Stimulated graciloplasty for treatment of intractable fecal incontinence: critical influence of the method of stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(4):497–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rongen MJGMU, O; El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, Konsten J, and Baeten CGMI. Long term results of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. In press 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Baeten CG, Buie WD, Christiansen J, et al. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(10):1427–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, and Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty. Complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(8):912–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rongen MJGM, Adang EM, Gerritsen van der Hoop A, and Baeten CI. One step versus two step procedure in dynamic graciloplasty. Submitted 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geerdes BP, Kurvers HA, Konsten J, Heineman E, and Baeten CG. Assessment of ischaemia of the distal part of the gracilis muscle during transposition for anal dynamic graciloplasty. Br J Surg. 1997;84(8):1127–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(9):1139–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams NS, Ogunbiyi OA, Scott SM, Fajobi O, and Lunniss PJ. Rectal augmentation and stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter: a new approach in the management of fecal urgency and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:192–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Briel JW, Schouten WR, Vlot EA, Smits S, and van Kessel I. Clinical value of colonic irrigation in patients with continence disturbances. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(7):802–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rongen MJ, van der Hoop AG, and Baeten CG. Cecal access for antegrade colon enemas in medically refractory slow-transit constipation: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(11):1644–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abercrombie JE and Williams NS. Total anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg. 1995;82(4):438–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Gerdes BP, Konsten J, and Baeten CG. Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:716–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A, et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:743–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelius G.M.I. Baeten
    • 1
  • Mart J. Rongen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryAcademic Hospital MaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations