Advertisement

Urogynecological Assessment and Perspective in Patients Presenting with Evacuatory Dysfunction

  • Jennifer T. Pollak
  • G. Willy Davila

Conclusions

The gynecologic indications for enterocele and rectocele repair are more numerous compared with the traditional colorectal indications because gynecologists primarily address vaginal symptoms when repairing a rectocele. Here, obstructive defecation symptoms are only some of a list of accepted indications. Preoperative evaluation typically only includes clinical assessment gained from the history and physical examination, and gynecologists rarely depend on defecography to plan a reconstructive procedure for rectoceles. Overall, surgical correction success rates are quite high when using a vaginal approach for rectocele correction. Vaginal dissection results in better visualization and access to the endopelvic fascia and levator musculature, which allows for a “firmer” anatomic correction. In addition, maintaining rectal mucosal integrity appears to reduce the risk of postoperative infection and fistula formation. More comprehensive data collection is necessary to better understand the effect of various surgical techniques on vaginal, sexual, and defecatory symptoms in these patients who may present with complex symptomatology where the rectocele and/or enterocele represent the dominant clinical finding.

Keywords

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Uterosacral Ligament Posterior Vaginal Wall Perineal Body Genital Prolapse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gonzalez-Argente FX, Jain A, Nogueras JJ, Davila GW, Weiss EG, and Wexner SD. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:920–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL, Mitchinson AR, and Walters MD. Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:423–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meschia M, Buonaguidi A, Pifarotti P, Somigliana E, Spennacchio M, and Amicerelli F. Prevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;4:719–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapoor, Davila GW, Wexner SD, and Ghoniem G. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:S53.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mizrahi, Kapoor, Nogueras JJ, Weiss E, Wexner SD, and Davila GW. ASCRS. 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davila GW, Ghoniem GM, Kapoor DS, and Contreras-Ortiz O. Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice patterns: a survey of members of the international urogynecological association. Int Urogynecol J. 2002;13:319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, and Bump RC. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1467–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: Its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36:976–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uhlenhuth E, Wolfe WM, Smith EM, and Middleton EB. The rectogenital septum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1948;86:148–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milley PS and Nichols DH. A correlative investigation of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec. 1969;163:443–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delancey JOL. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, BeerGabel M, and Pescatori M. Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:369–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shull BL and Bachofen CG. Enterocele and rectocele. In: Walters MD and Karram MM, editors. Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 221–34.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brubaker L. Rectocele. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:376–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kahn MA and Stanton SL. Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects of bowel function. Int Urogynecol J. 1998;9:37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delancey JOL and Hurd WW. Size of the urogential hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:364–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Given FT Jr. “Posterior culdeplasty”: revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 153:135–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moschcowitz AV. The pathogenesis, anatomy and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1912;15:7–12.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nichols DH. Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy: separate and distinct operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:714–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paraiso MF, Weber AM, Walters MD, Ballard LA, Piedmonte MR, and Skibinshi C. Anatomic and functional outcome after posterior colporrhaphy. J Pelvic Surg. 2001;7:335–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mellgren A, Anzen B, Nilsson BY, et al. Results of rectocele repair; a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kahn MA and Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:82–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lopez A, Anzen B, Bremmer S, et al. Durability of success after rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Francis WJ and Jeffcoate TN. Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1961;68:1–10.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, and Bump RC. An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1451–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glavind K and Madsen H. A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:145–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kenton K, Shott S, and Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1360–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, and Karram MM. The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1353–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fox SD and Stanton SL. Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107:1371–5.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor GM, Ballard P, and Jarvis GJ. Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;8:775–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Birch C and Fynes MM. The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;14:527–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, and Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 1997;8:105–15.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Øster S and Astrup A. A new vaginal operation for recurrent and large rectocele using dermis transplant. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1981;60:493–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sand PK, Koduri S, and Lobel RW. Prospective randomized trial of Polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrences of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1357–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parker MC and Phillips RKS. Repair of rectocoele using Marlex mesh. Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1993;75:193–4.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watson SJ, Loder PB, and Halligan S. Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:257–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sullivan ES, Longaker CJ, and Lee PYH. Total pelvic mesh repair: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:857–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paraiso MFR, Falcone T, and Walters MD. Laparoscopic surgery for enterocele, vaginal apex prolapse and rectocele. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10:223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lyons TL and Winer WK. Laparoscopic rectocele repair using polyglactin mesh. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4:381–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marks MM. The rectal side of the rectocele. Dis Colon Rectum. 1967;10:387–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sehapayak S. Transrectal repair of rectocele: An extended armamentarium of colorectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;6:422–33.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Arnold MW, Stewart WRC, and Aguilar PS. Rectocele: four years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:684–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer T. Pollak
    • 1
  • G. Willy Davila
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology, Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic SurgeryCleveland Clinic FloridaWestonUSA

Personalised recommendations