• Kim F. Rhoads
  • Julio Garcia-Aguilar


Fecal Incontinence External Anal Sphincter Chronic Constipation Functional Constipation Puborectalis Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Preston DM and Lennard-Jones JE. Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 1985;30:413–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wasserman IF. Puborectalis syndrome (rectal stenosis due to anorectal spasm). Dis Colon Rectum. 1964;7:87–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, and Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance? Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:667–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuijpers HC and Bleijenberg G. The spastic pelvic floor syndrome. A cause of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:669–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drossman DA RJ, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Corazziari, and Whitehead WE, editors. The functional gastrointestinal disorders: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment: a multinational consensus. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitehead WE, Wald A, Diamant NE, Enck P, Pemberton JH, and Rao SS. Functional disorders of the anus and rectum. Gut. 1999;45Suppl 2:II55–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sonnenberg A and Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1569–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3530–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wald A, Chandra R, Chiponis D, and Gabel S. Anorectal function and continence mechanisms in childhood encopresis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5:346–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wald A, Caruana BJ, Freimanis MG, Bauman DH, and Hinds JP. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:481–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stewart RB, Moore MT, Marks RG, and Hale WE. Correlates of constipation in an ambulatory elderly population. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:859–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ, et al. Anismus: fact or fiction? Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:1033–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glia A, Lindberg G, Nilsson LH, Mihocsa L, and Akerlund JE. Clinical value of symptom assessment in patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1401–8; discussion 1408–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duthie GS and Bartolo DC. Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment. World J Surg. 1992;16:831–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turnbull GK and Ritvo PG. Anal sphincter biofeedback relaxation treatment for women with intractable constipation symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:530–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keck JO, Staniunas RJ, Coller JA, et al. Biofeedback training is useful in fecal incontinence but disappointing in constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1271–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wald A, Hinds JP, and Caruana BJ. Psychological and physiological characteristics of patients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:932–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Devroede G, Girard G, Bouchoucha M, et al. Idiopathic constipation by colonic dysfunction. Relationship with personality and anxiety. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1428–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drossman DA, Talley NJ, Leserman J, Olden KW, and Barreiro MA. Sexual and physical abuse and gastrointestinal illness. Review and recommendations. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:782–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leroi AM, Bernier C, Watier A, et al. Prevalence of sexual abuse among patients with functional disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10:200–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nehra V, Bruce BK, Rath-Harvey DM, Pemberton JH, and Camilleri M. Psychological disorders in patients with evacuation disorders and constipation in a tertiary practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1755–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mason HJ, Serrano-Ikkos E, and Kamm MA. Psychological morbidity in women with idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2852–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mason HJ, Serrano-Ikkos E, and Kamm MA. Psychological state and quality of life in patients having behavioral treatment (biofeedback) for intractable constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3154–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Locke GR 3rd, Pemberton JH, and Phillips SF. AGA technical review on constipation. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1766–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, and Whitehead WE. AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:735–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Locke GR 3rd, Pemberton JH, and Phillips SF. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: guidelines on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1761–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, and Duguay C. Mechanisms of idiopathic constipation: outlet obstruction. Gastroenterology. 1978;75:623–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, and Wolff BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:40–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Heinrich CA, Schindlbeck NE, and Muller-Lissner SA. Behavioral modification of colonic function. Can constipation be learned? Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:1271–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prokesch RW, Breitenseher MJ, Kettenbach J, et al. Assessment of chronic constipation: colon transit time versus defecography. Eur J Radiol. 1999;32:197–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ger GC, Wexner SD, Jorge JM, and Salanga VD. Anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:816–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M, Tetzschner T, and Christiansen J. Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:901–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tobon F, Reid NC, Talbert JL, and Schuster MM. Nonsurgical test for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1968;278:188–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borowitz SM, Sutphen J, Ling W, and Cox DJ. Lack of correlation of anorectal manometry with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:400–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sutphen J, Borowitz S, Ling W, Cox DJ, and Kovatchev B. Anorectal manometric examination in encopretic-constipated children. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:1051–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fleshman JW, Dreznik Z, Cohen E, Fry RD, and Kodner IJ. Balloon expulsion test facilitates diagnosis of pelvic floor outlet obstruction due to nonrelaxing puborectalis muscle. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:1019–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sorensen M, Tetzschner T, Rasmussen OO, and Christiansen J. Relation between electromyography and anal manometry of the external anal sphincter. Gut. 1991;32:1031–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Salanga VD, Corredor C, and Jagelman DG. Neurophysiologic assessment of the anal sphincters. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:606–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fink RL, Roberts LJ, and Scott M. The role of manometry, electromyography and radiology in the assessment of intractable constipation. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62:959–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pfeifer J, Teoh TA, Salanga VD, Agachan F, and Wexner SD. Comparative study between intra-anal sponge and needle electrode for electromyographic evaluation of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1153–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mayo SW, Jensen L, Park DK, and Congilosi S. Is any puborectalis evaluation technique predictive of success with biofeedback? Proceedings of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Annual Meeting; 2001 Jun 2–7; San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lopez A, Holmstrom B, Nilsson BY, Dolk A, Johannson C, Schultz I, Zetterstrom J, and Mellgren A. Paradoxical sphincter reaction is influenced by rectal filling volume. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1017–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Womack NR, Williams NS, Holmfield JH, Morrison JF, and Simpkins KC. New method for the dynamic assessment of anorectal function in constipation. Br J Surg. 1985;72:994–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Karlbom U, Edebol Eeg-Olofsson K, Graf W, Nilsson S, and Pahlman L. Paradoxical puborectalis contraction is associated with impaired rectal evacuation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;13:141–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Roberts JP, Womack NR, Hallan RI, Thorpe AC, and Williams NS. Evidence from dynamic integrated proctography to redefine anismus. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1213–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ger GC, Salanga VD, Nogueras JJ, and Jagelman DG. Cinedefecography and electromyography in the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:668–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, and Bodart P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:247–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, and Bodart P. Defecography: II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:253–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kuijpers HC and Strijk SP. Diagnosis of disturbances of continence and defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:658–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, and Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:190–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Virjee J, Mortensen NJ, and Locke-Edmunds JC. An analysis of rectal morphology in obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;3:17–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, and Benson JT. Evacuation proctography (defecography): an aid to the investigation of pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:307–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Agachan F, Pfeifer J, and Wexner SD. Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:899–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Halligan S, Bartram CI, Park HJ, and Kamm MA. Proctographic features of anismus. Radiology. 1995;197:679–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, Marshall M, Hollings N, and Kamm MA. Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:633–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, and Graf W. Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology. 1999;210:103–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wiersma TG, Mulder CJ, Reeders JW, Tytgat GN, and Van Waes PF. Dynamic rectal examination (defecography). Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;8:729–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kawimbe BM, Papachrysostomou M, Binnie NR, Clare N, and Smith AN. Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback. Gut. 1991;32:1175–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goei R. Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: evaluation with defecography. Radiology. 1990;174:121–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hiltunen KM, Kolehmainen H, and Matikainen M. Does defecography help in diagnosis and clinical decision-making in defecation disorders? Abdom Imaging. 1994;19:355–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ott DJ, Donati DL, Kerr RM, and Chen MY. Defecography: results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management. Abdom Imaging. 1994;19:349–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jones HJ, Swift RI, and Blake H. A prospective audit of the usefulness of evacuating proctography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80:40–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    O’Connell PR, Kelly KA, and Brown ML. Scintigraphic assessment of neorectal motor function. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:460–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wald A, Jafri F, Rehder J, and Holeva K. Scintigraphic studies of rectal emptying in patients with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:353–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Papachrysostomou M, Stevenson AJ, Ferrington C, Merrick MV, and Smith AN. Evaluation of isotope proctography in constipated subjects. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;8:18–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hutchinson R, Mostafa AB, Grant EA, et al. Scintigraphic defecography: quantitative and dynamic assessment of anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:1132–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kruyt RH, Delemarre JB, Doornbos J, and Vogel HJ. Normal anorectum: dynamic MR imaging anatomy. Radiology. 1991;179:159–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with obstructed defaecation. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1555–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:775–9.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Matsuoka H, Wexner SD, Desai MB, et al. A comparison between dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and videoproctography in patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:571–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, Hany TF, Steiner P, and Krestin GP. Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology. 1998;206:641–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lamb GM, de Jode MG, Gould SW, et al. Upright dynamic MR defaecating proctography in an open configuration MR system. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:152–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Law PA, Danin JC, Lamb GM, Regan L, Darzi A, and Gedroyc WM. Dynamic imaging of the pelvic floor using an open-configuration magnetic resonance scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:923–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, Treiber K, Marincek B, and Hilfiker PR. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology. 2002;223:501–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Barnes PR and Lennard-Jones JE. Balloon expulsion from the rectum in constipation of different types. Gut. 1985;26:1049–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE, and Bartram CI. Failure of rectal expulsion as a cause of constipation: why fibre and laxatives sometimes fail. Lancet. 1986;1:767–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome II process. Gut. 1999;45Suppl 2:II1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wallace WC and Madden WM. Experience with partial resection of the puborectalis muscle. Dis Colon Rectum. 1969;12:196–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Barnes PR, Hawley PR, Preston DM, and Lennard-Jones JE. Experience of posterior division of the puborectalis muscle in the management of chronic constipation. Br J Surg. 1985;72:475–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kamm MA, Hawley PR, and Lennard-Jones JE. Lateral division of the puborectalis muscle in the management of severe constipation. Br J Surg. 1988;75:661–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yoshioka K and Keighley MR. Anorectal myectomy for outlet obstruction. Br J Surg. 1987;74:373–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yoshioka K and Keighley MR. Randomized trial comparing anorectal myectomy and controlled anal dilatation for outlet obstruction. Br J Surg. 1987;74:1125–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pinho M, Yoshioka K, and Keighley MR. Long term results of anorectal myectomy for chronic constipation. Br J Surg. 1989;76:1163–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Engel BT, Nikoomanesh P, and Schuster MM. Operant conditioning of rectosphincteric responses in the treatment of fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:646–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Almy TP and Corson JA. Biofeedback–the light at the end of the tunnel? Gastroenterology. 1979;76:874–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Olness K, McParland FA, and Piper J. Biofeedback: a new modality in the management of children with fecal soiling. J Pediatr. 1980;96:505–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Enck P. Biofeedback training in disordered defecation. A critical review. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1953–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Dahl J, Lindquist BL, Tysk C, Leissner P, Philipson L, and Jarnerot G. Behavioral medicine treatment in chronic constipation with paradoxical anal sphincter contraction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:769–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lestar B, Penninckx F, and Kerremans R. Biofeedback defaecation training for anismus. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991;6:202–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wexner SD, Cheape JD, Jorge JM, Heymen S, and Jagelman DG. Prospective assessment of biofeedback for the treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, Storrie JB, and Turner IC. Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation. Gut. 1998;42:517–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Karlbom U, Hallden M, Eeg-Olofsson KE, Pahlman L, and Graf W. Results of biofeedback in constipated patients: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:1149–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Rieger NA, Wattchow DA, Sarre RG, Saccone GT, Rich CA, Cooper SJ, Marshall VR, and McCall JL. Prospective study of biofeedback for treatment of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:1143–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Weber J, Ducrotte P, Touchais JY, Roussignol C, and Denis P. Biofeedback training for constipation in adults and children. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:844–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ho YH, Tan M, and Goh HS. Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:520–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Rao SS, Welcher KD, and Pelsang RE. Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:2197–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Park UC, Choi SK, Piccirillo MF, Verzaro R, and Wexner SD. Patterns of anismus and the relation to biofeedback therapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:768–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ko CY, Tong J, Lehman RE, Shelton AA, Schrock TR, and Welton ML. Biofeedback is effective therapy for fecal incontinence and constipation. Arch Surg. 1997;132:829–33; discussion 833-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Loening-Baucke V. Persistence of chronic constipation in children after biofeedback treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36:153–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Papachrysostomou M and Smith AN. Effects of biofeedback on obstructive defecation—reconditioning of the defecation reflex? Gut. 1994;35:252–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    McKee RF, McEnroe L, Anderson JH, and Finlay IG. Identification of patients likely to benefit from biofeedback for outlet obstruction constipation. Br J Surg. 1999;86:355–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Heymen S, Wexner SD, Vickers D, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, and Pikarsky AJ. Prospective, randomized trial comparing four biofeedback techniques for patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1388–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bleijenberg G and Kuijpers HC. Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a comparison of two methods. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:1021–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Glia A, Gylin M, Gullberg K, and Lindberg G. Biofeedback retraining in patients with functional constipation and paradoxical puborectalis contraction: comparison of anal manometry and sphincter electromyography for feedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:889–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Koutsomanis D, Lennard-Jones JE, Roy AJ, and Kamm MA. Controlled randomised trial of visual biofeedback versus muscle training without a visual display for intractable constipation. Gut. 1995;37:95–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Bleijenberg G and Kuijpers HC. Treatment of the spastic pelvic floor syndrome with biofeedback. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:108–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Larach SW, et al. Electromyographic assessment of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:907–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Leroi AM, Duval V, Roussignol C, Berkelmans I, Peninque P, and Denis P. Biofeedback for anismus in 15 sexually abused women. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:187–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Gilliland R, Heymen S, Altomare DF, Park UC, Vickers D, and Wexner SD. Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1123–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Dailianas A, Skandalis N, Rimikis MN, Koutsomanis D, Kardasi M, and Archimandritis A. Pelvic floor study in patients with obstructive defecation: influence of biofeedback. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30:176–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wiesel PH, Dorta G, Cuypers P, et al. Patient satisfaction after biofeedback for constipation and pelvic floor dyssynergia. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001;131:152–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Fleshman JW, Dreznik Z, Meyer K, Fry RD, Carney R, and Kodner IJ. Outpatient protocol for biofeedback therapy of pelvic floor outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Ferrara A, De Jesus S, Gallagher JT, et al. Time-related decay of the benefits of biofeedback therapy. Tech Coloproctol. 2001;5:131–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Enck P, Daublin G, Lubke HJ, and Strohmeyer G. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:997–1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Guillemot F, Bouche B, Gower-Rousseau C, et al. Biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Long-term clinical results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:393–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Loening-Baucke V. Biofeedback treatment for chronic constipation and encopresis in childhood: long-term outcome. Pediatrics. 1995;96:105–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Benninga MA, Buller HA, and Taminiau JA. Biofeedback training in chronic constipation. Arch Dis Child. 1993;68:126–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Wald A, Chandra R, Gabel S, and Chiponis D. Evaluation of biofeedback in childhood encopresis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1987;6:554–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Loening-Baucke V. Modulation of abnormal defecation dynamics by biofeedback treatment in chronically constipated children with encopresis. J Pediatr. 1990;116:214–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Buller HA, et al. Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study. Lancet. 1996;348:776–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, Taminiau JA, and Buller HA. Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis. Arch Dis Child. 1996;75:367–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Nolan T, Catto-Smith T, Coffey C, and Wells J. Randomised controlled trial of biofeedback training in persistent encopresis with anismus. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:131–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Borowitz SM, Cox DJ, Sutphen JL, and Kovatchev B. Treatment of childhood encopresis: a randomized trial comparing three treatment protocols. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34:378–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Siproudhis L, Dautreme S, Ropert A, et al. Anismus and biofeedback: who benefits? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;7:547–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Rhee PL, Choi MS, Kim YH, et al. An increased rectal maximum tolerable volume and long anal canal are associated with poor short-term response to biofeedback therapy for patients with anismus with decreased bowel frequency and normal colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1405–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Lau CW, Heymen S, Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, and Wexner SD. Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:478–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Levy JR, Larach SW, Williamson PR, and Perozo SE. Biofeedback in colorectal practice: a multicenter, statewide, three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:827–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Hallan RI, Williams NS, Melling J, Waldron DJ, Womack NR, and Morrison JF. Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum A toxin. Lancet. 1988;2:714–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Joo JS, Agachan F, Wolff B, Nogueras JJ, and Wexner SD. Initial North American experience with botulinum toxin type A for treatment of anismus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:1107–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Maria G, Brisinda G, Bentivoglio AR, Cassetta E, and Albanese A. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of outlet obstruction constipation caused by puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:376–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Ron Y, Avni Y, Lukovetski A, et al. Botulinum toxin type-A in therapy of patients with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1821–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Tanagho EA and Schmidt RA. Bladder pacemaker: scientific basis and clinical future. Urology. 1982;20:614–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, and Hohenberger W. Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Chirurg. 2003;74:26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Malouf AJ, Wiesel PH, Nicholls T, Nicholls RJ, and Kamm MA. Short-term effects of sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic slow transit constipation. World J Surg. 2002;26:166–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Kenefick NJ, Nicholls RJ, Cohen RG, and Kamm MA. Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg. 2002;89:882–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen CR, Nicholls RJ, and Kamm MA. Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1570–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Halverson AL, and Orkin BA. Which psychological tests are useful in patients with constipation? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:735–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Rao SSC, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS. Obstruction defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1042–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Gosselink MJ and Schouten WR. Rectal sensory perception in females with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1337–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim F. Rhoads
    • 1
  • Julio Garcia-Aguilar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations