Advertisement

MRI in Colorectal Surgery: Endoluminal MR Imaging of Anorectal Diseases

  • Jaap Stoker

Conclusions

Endoluminal MRI is in many aspects superior to body coil MRI and in some aspects superior to external phased array MRI and endosonography. The latter primarily concerns the evaluation of EAS atrophy in fecal incontinence. When an EAS defect diagnosed at endosonography is considered for surgical repair, then an endoluminal MRI should be performed (where available) to exclude substantial external sphincter atrophy. Until now, no data are available on external phased array MRI in fecal incontinence. In perianal fistulas, endoanal MRI is preferable in cryptoglandular fistulas, while in Crohn’s disease, preliminary evidence suggests a benefit in external phased array coil MRI. The limitations in endoanal probe technology for some important questions in complex perirectal sepsis still apply and have been outlined in this chapter; however, Gadolinium or saline enhancement will readily distinguish residual or recrudescent sepsis from burnt-out scar tissue. In rectal cancer, endorectal MRI has not been demonstrated to be superior to endosonography or external phased array MRI, and its role appears limited. Unfortunately, it has not proven useful in the differentiation between T1 and T2 tumors despite high resolution of the soft tissues, and therefore it cannot enhance surgical decision making regarding curative TEMS. The use of endoluminal MRI might be advantageous in anal tumors for determining depth of infiltration; however, until now, no study has sufficiently evaluated endoluminal MRI in this condition.

Keywords

Fecal Incontinence Anal Sphincter External Anal Sphincter Anorectal Disease Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stoker J, Hussain SM, van Kempen D, Elevelt AJ, and Laméris JS. Endoanal coil in MR imaging of anal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:360–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hussain SM, Stoker J, and Laméris JS. Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology. 1995;197:671–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, Hop WCJ, and Laméris JS. Fistulo-in-ano: endoanal sonography vs endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology. 1996;200:475–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, Puni R, and Steiner RE. MRI of fistulo-in-ano: a comparison of endoanal coil with external phased array coil techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:357–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, et al. Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: Does it really help the surgeon? Radiology. 2001;218:75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zbar AP and deSouza NM. The anal sphincter. In: de Souza NM, editor. Endocavitary MRI of the pelvis. London: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2001. pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW, Schouten WR, and Laméris JS. Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: Technique, applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 1999;19:383–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zbar AP, deSouza NM, Puni R, and Kmiot WA. Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings in perirectal sepsis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:111–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rociu E and Stoker J. Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. In: Bartram CI and DeLancey JOL, editors. Imaging pelvic floor disorders. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2003 in press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, and Laméris JS. Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age-and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;217:395–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJC, Schouten WR, and Laméris JS. Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 1999; 212:453–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malouf AJ, Halligan S, Williams AB, Bartram CI, Dhillon S, and Kamm MA. Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for endoanal MRI in fecal incontinence. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:76–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Dhillon S, and Kamm MA. Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175:741–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, and Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1997;349(9052):612–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    deSouza NM, Williams AD, Wilson HJ, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, and Black CM. Fecal incontinence in systemic sclerosis: assessment of the anal sphincter using high resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 1998;208:529–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Briel JW, Stoker J, Rociu E, Laméris JS, Hop WCJ, and Schouten WR. External anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1322–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Briel JW, Zimmerman D, Stoker J, Rociu E, Laméris JS, Mooi WJ, and Schouten WR. Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:87–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams AB, Malouf AJ, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Kamm MA, and Kmiot WA. Assessment of external anal sphincter morphology in idiopathic fecal incontinence with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:1466–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beets-Tan RG, Morren GL, Beets GL, et al. Measurement of anal sphincter muscles: endoanal US, endoanal MR imaging, or phased-array MR imaging? A study with healthy volunteers. Radiology. 2001;220:81–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Humphries KN, Kamm MA, and Kmiot WA. 3-D endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Br J Surg. 1999;86:365–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tio TL, Mulder CJJ, Wijers OB, Sars PRA, and Tytgat GNJ. Endosonography of peri-anal and peri-colorectal fistula and/or abscess in Crohn’s disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:331–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weisman RI, Orsay CP, Pearl RK, and Abcarian H. The role of fistulography in fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:181–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spencer JA, Ward J, Beckingham IJ, Adams C, and Ambrose NS. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;191:545–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zbar AP and deSouza NM. Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1093–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheong DMO, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, and Jagelman DG. Anal endonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:1158–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    West RL, Zimmerman DDE, Dwarkasing S, Hop WCJ, Hussain SM, Schouten WR, Kuipers EJ, and Felt-Bersma RJ. Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal MR-imaging of perianal fistulas. In: Zimmerman DDE, editor. Diagnosis and treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas [thesis]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University; 2003. pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barker PG, Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Reznek RH, Cottam K, and Phillips RK. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula in ano: technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, and Madoff RD. Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:723–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, and Neufeld DM. Endorectal sliding flap repair of complicated anterior anoperineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:22–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shouler PJ, Grimley RP, Keighley MRB, and Alexander-Williams J. Fistula in ano is usually simple to manage surgically. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986;1:113–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, et al. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1064–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB, Cohen RCG, Tarroni D, Phillips RKS, and Bartram CI. Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula in ano. Br J Surg. 2003;90:877–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A, Cohen CR, Tarroni D, Phillips RK, and Bartram CI. Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet. 2002;360:1661–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoker J, Rociu E, Schouten WR, and Laméris JS. Anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas: endoluminal sonography versus endoluminal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:737–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zagoria RJ, Schlarb CA, Ott DJ, et al. Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparison with endoscopic rectal sonography. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64:312–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hünerbein M, Pegios W, Rau B, Vogl TJ, Felix R, and Schlag PM. Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1005–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gualdi GF, Casciani E, Guadalaxara A, d’Orta C, Polletini E, and Pappalardo G. Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:338–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, and Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a metal-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232:773–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Blomqvist L, Holm T, Rubio C, and Hindmarsh T. Rectal tumours. MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections. Acta Radiol. 1997;38:437–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zbar AP, deSouza NM, Strickland N, Pignatelli M, and Kmiot WA. Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 1998;2:61–6.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jass JR, Miller K, and Northover JM. Fat clearance method versus manual dissection of lymph nodes in specimens of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986;1:155–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Herrera-Ornelas L, Justiniano J, Castillo N, Petrelli NJ, Stulc JP, and Mittelman A. Metastases in small lymph nodes from colon cancer. Arch Surg. 1987; 122:1253–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 44.
    Dworak O. Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc. 1989;3:96–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 45.
    Koh D, Brown G, Temple L, Raja A, Toomey P, and Husband JE. MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer using USPIO: preliminary observations. Radiology. 2002;225:244.Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet. 2001;357:497–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 47.
    Hadfield MB, Nicholson AA, MacDonald AW, Farouk R, Lee PWR, Duthie GS, and Monson JRT. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased-array coil. Br J Surg. 1997;84:529–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 48.
    Urban M, Rosen HR, Hölbling N, et al. MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphincter-saving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum: use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials. Radiology. 2000;214:503–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 49.
    Indinnimeo M, Grasso RF, Cicchini C, et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Int Surg. 1996;81:419–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 50.
    Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, Deserno WM, Tabatabaei S, van de Kaa CH, de la Rosette J, and Weissleder R. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2491–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaap Stoker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations