Skip to main content

Neurophysiology

  • Chapter
Neurosurgery

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to provide a brief description and critical review of the various intraoperative monitoring techniques available to the modern neurosurgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zampella E, Morawetz RB, McDowell HA, Zeiger HE, Varner PD, McKay RD et al. The importance of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery 1991;29:727–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salvian AJ, Taylor DC, Hsiang YN et al. Selective shunting with EEG monitoring is safer than routine shunting for carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:481–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Redekop G, Ferguson G. Correlation of contralateral stenosis and intraoperative electroencephalogram change with risk of stroke during carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery 1992;30:191–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Plestis KA, Loubser P, Mizrahi EM, Kantis G, Jiang ZD, Howell JF. Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting reduces neurologic morbidity rates in carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:620–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz TH, Bazil CW, Forgione M, Bruce JN, Goodman RR. Do reactive post-resection “injury” spikes exist? Epilepsia 2000;41:1463–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher RS, Raudzens P, Nunemacher M. Efficacy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:97–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haupt WF, Horsch S. Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: a review of 994 cases. Neurology 1992;42:835–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerit JM. Neuromonitoring in the operating room: why, when, and how to monitor? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:1–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fava E, Bortolani E, Ducati A, Schieppati M. Role of SEP in identifying patients requiring temporary shunt during carotid endarterectomy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992;84:426–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, Kanim LE, Sherman JE. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:6–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Milhorat TH, Kotzen RM, Capocelli AL Jr, Bolognese P, Bendo AA, Cottrell JE. Intraoperative improvement of somatosensory evoked potentials and local spinal cord blood flow in patients with syringomyelia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1996;8:208–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. May DM, Jones SJ, Crockard HA. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre-and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg 1996;85:566–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LE, Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine 1991;16:S361–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson-Holden TJ, Padberg AM, Parkinson JD, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Bassett GS. A prospective comparison of neurogenic mixed evoked potential stimulation methods: utility of epidural elicitation during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 2000;25:2364–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pereon Y, Bernard JM, Fayet G, Delecrin J, Passuti N, Guiheneuc P. Usefulness of neurogenic motor evoked potentials for spinal cord monitoring: findings in 112 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kothbauer K, Schmid UD, Seiler RW, Eisner W. Intraoperative motor and sensory monitoring of the cauda equina. Neurosurgery 1994;34:702–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kothbauer K, Deletis V, Epstein FJ. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for intramedullary surgery: an essential adjunct. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:247–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagle KJ, Emerson RG, Adams DC et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials: a review of 116 cases. Neurology 1996;47:999–1004.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hariz MI, Fodstad H. Do microelectrode techniques increase accuracy or decrease risks in pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation? A critical review of the literature. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72:157–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer G, Fischer C, Remond J. Hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. J Neurosurg 1992;76:910–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fahlbusch R, Neu M, Strauss C. Preservation of hearing in large acoustic neurinomas following removal via suboccipito-lateral approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:771–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sundt TM. The ischemic tolerance of neural tissue and the need for monitoring and selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1983;14:93–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ackerstaff RG, Moons KG, van de Vlasakker CJ et al. Association of intraoperative transcranial doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2000;31:1817–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barrow DL, Boyer KL, Joseph GJ. Intraoperative angiography in the management of neurovascular disorders. Neurosurgery 1992;30:153-.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kline DG, Happel LT. A quarter century’s experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording. Can J Neurol Sci 1993;20:3-0.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waziri, A.E., Taggard, D.A., Traynelis, V.C. (2005). Neurophysiology. In: Moore, A.J., Newell, D.W. (eds) Neurosurgery. Springer Specialist Surgery Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-051-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-051-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-522-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-051-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics