Conclusion
Although at first thought, vaginal and urethral devices may seem to be ideal means to manage mild to moderate stress incontinence, in practice, their acceptance has been low. Nonsurgical therapy requires motivation, patience, and long-term commitment. In addition, the vaginal and urethral devices cure far less women than surgery. However, they may increase the quality of life for patients who are medically unfit for surgery or who do not desire an operation. The “nuisance factor” associated with device care is the major barrier to greater acceptance. The devices may be ideal for women with only exercise-induced incontinence or for those who need a temporary treatment until they are able to undergo surgery. Surgery and pelvic floor rehabilitation remain the most common and popular treatments for stress urinary incontinence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Elliott DS, Boone TB. Urethral devices for managing stress urinary incontinence. J Endourol 2000;14(1):79–83.
Vierhout ME, Lose G. Preventive vaginal and intra-urethral devices in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1997;9(5):325–328.
Glavind K. Use of a vaginal sponge during aerobic exercises in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1997;8: 351–353.
Nygaard I. Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices. J Reprod Med 1995;40:89–94.
Robert M, Mainprize TC. Long-term assessment of the incontinence ring pessary for the treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002;13:326–329.
Thyssen H, Bidmead J, Lose G, Moller Bek K, Dwyer P, Cardozo L. A new intravaginal device for stress incontinence in women. BJU Int 2001;88(9):889–892.
Trincello D, Bolderson J, Richmond D. Preliminary experience with a urinary control device in the management of women with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1997;80:752–756.
Rabin JM. Clinical use of the FemAssist device in female urinary incontinence. J Med Syst 1998;22:257–271.
Brubaker L, Harris T, Gleason D, Newman D, North B. The external urethral barrier for stress incontinence: a multicenter trial of safety and efficacy. Miniguard Investigators Group. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93(6):932–937.
Staskin D, Bavendam T, Miller J, et al. Effectiveness of a urinary control insert in the management of stress urinary incontinence: early results of a multicenter study. Urology 1996;47:629–636.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pollak, J.T., Davila, G.W. (2006). Device Therapy for Stress Incontinence. In: Davila, G.W., Ghoniem, G.M., Wexner, S.D. (eds) Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-010-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-010-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-730-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-010-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)