Abstract
This paper focuses on understanding the knowledge politics that inhibit effective use of geographic information systems (GIS) for managing the land degradation problem in India. It is argued that the issues of power and politics of knowledge are ubiquitously embedded in representation of the problem domain and the technology itself. Addressing these issues is an inseparable part of the challenges to information systems design and implementation. Theoretical perspective is first developed around political considerations involved in the co-construction and use of knowledge domains relevant to the design of GIS applications to address land degradation. This theoretical framework is drawn upon to analyze the politics of representation, the politics of invisible work, and the politics of institutions observed in the case of a GIS implementation in rural India. The analysis also demonstrates how the insidious impacts of such politics may be somewhat mitigated by creating socio-material networks to cultivate communicative action that leads to better design and technology acceptance by the end users.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Agrawal, A. “Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge,” Development and Change (26:3), 1995, pp. 413–439.
Asaro, P. M. “Transforming Society by Transforming Technology: The Science and Politics of Participatory Design,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (10), 2000, pp. 257–290.
Baber, Z. “Colonizing Nature: Scientific Knowledge, Colonial Power and the Incorporation of India into the Modern World-System,” British Journal of Sociology (52:1), 2001, pp. 37–58.
Banuri, T., and Marglin, F. A. “A System-of-Knowledge Analysis of Deforestation, Participation and Management,” in T. Banuri and F. A. Marglin, (Eds.), Who Will Save the Forests? Knowledge, Power and Environmental Destruction, London: Zed Books, 1993, pp. 1–23.
Beck, E. “P for Political: Participation Is Not Enough,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (14), 2002, pp. 77–92.
Berger, P. L, and Luckmann, T. The Social Construction of Reality, London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1967.
Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
Braaten, J. “From Communicative Rationality to Communicative Thinking: A Basis for Feminist Theory and Practice,” in J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 139–161.
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, 1979.
Campbell, H., and Masser, J. GIS and organizations: How Effective Are GIS in Practice? London: Taylor & Francis, 1995.
Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. Soft System Methodology in Action, Chichester, England: John Wiley, 1990.
Devine, F. “Qualitative Methods,” in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science, London: Macmillan Press, 1995, pp. 137–153.
Drucker, P. F. “The Coming of the New Organization,” Harvard Business Review, January–February 1988, pp. 45–53.
Floyd, C. “Towards Knowledge Co-construction,” in C. Floyd, G. Kelkar, S. Klein-Franke, C. Kramarae, and C. Limpangog (Eds.), Feminist Challenges in the Information Age-Information as a Social Resource, Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich, 2002, pp. 203–222.
Fox, J. M. “Spatial Information for Resource Managers in Asia: A Review of Institutional Issues, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems (5:1), 1991, pp. 59–72.
Gadgil, M. “Biodiversity and India’s Degraded Lands,” Ambio (22:2–3), 1993, pp. 167–172.
Gadgil, M., and Guha, R. Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India, London: Routledge, 1995.
Government of India. Guidelines for Watershed Development, Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi, 1995.
Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society (Volume I), Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
Haeuber, R. “Development and Deforestation: Indian Forestry in Perspective,” The Journal of Developing Areas (27), 1993, pp. 485–514.
Harley, J. B. “Deconstructing the Map,” in T. J. Barnes and J. S. Duncan (Eds.), Writing Worlds, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 231–247.
Harley, J. B. “Map, Knowledge and Power,” in D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels (Eds.), The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 277–312.
Harvey, D. The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. “Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS,” MIS Quarterly (18:1), 1994, pp. 83–109.
Hoeschele, W. “Geographic Information Engineering and Social Ground Truth in Attappadi, Kerala State, India,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers (90:2), 2000, pp. 293–321.
Howard, A., and Widdowson, F. “Traditional Knowledge Advocates Weave a Tangled Web,” Policy Options/Options Politiques, April 1997, pp. 46–48.
Howard, A., and Widdowson, F. “Traditional Knowledge Threatens Environmental Assessment,” Policy Options/Options Politiques, November 1996, pp. 34–36.
Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), 1999, pp. 67–93.
Klein, H. K., and Lyytinen, K. “Towards a New Understanding of Data Modelling,” in C. Floyd, H. Zullighoven, R. Budde, and R. Keil-Slawick (Eds.), Software Development and Reality Construction, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp. 203–219.
Kumar, A., Bren, L., and Ferguson, I. “The Use and Management of Common Lands of the Aravalli, India,” The International Forestry Review (2:2), 2000, pp. 97–104.
Lyytinen, K. “Information Systems and Critical Theory,” in Critical Management Studies. M. Alvesson, and H. Willmott (eds.), Sage Publications, London, 1992, pp. 159–180.
Mathias, E. “Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Development,” Working Paper No. 53, International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Y.C. James Centre, Silang, Cavite 4118, Philippines, April 1994.
Mumford, E. Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS Approach, London: MacMillan, 1995.
Mundy, P., and Compton J. L. “Indigenous Communication and Indigenous Knowledge” in D. M. Warren, D. Brokensha, and L. J. Slikkerveer (Eds), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems, London: Intermediate Technology, 1995, pp. 112–123.
NRSA. Integrated Mission for Sustainable Development, National Remote Sensing Agency, Department of Space, Government of India, Hyderabad, 2002.
Ngwenyama, O. K. “The Critical Social Theory Approach to Information Systems: Problems and Challenges,” in H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991, pp. 267–280.
Pfeffer, J. Managing With Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
Rao Rama Mohan, M. S., Batchelor, C. H., James, A. J., Nagaraja, R., Seeley, J. and Butterworth, J. A. APRLP Water Audit, Andhra Pradesh Rural Livelihood Project, Department of Rural Development, Hyderabad, 2003.
Rao, R. S., Venkataswamy, C., Rao, C. M., and Rama Krishna, G. V. A. (1993) “Identification of Overdeveloped Zones of Ground Water and the Location of Rainwater Harvesting Structures Using an Integrated Remote Sensing Based Approach—A Case Study in Part of the Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India,” International Journal of Remote Sensing (14:17), 1993, pp. 3231–3237.
Rajasekaran, B., Martin, R. A., and Warren, M. “A Framework for Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge Systems into Agricultural Extension Organizations for Sustainable Agricultural Development in India,” Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Spring 1994, pp. 25–31.
Reeve, D., and Fetch, J. GIS Organisations and People: A Socio-Technical Approach, London: Taylor & Francis, 1999.
Sahay, S. “Implementing GIS technology in India: Some Issues of Time and Space,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (8:2–3), 1998, pp. 147–188.
Sahay, S., and Walsham, G. “Implementation of GIS in India: Organizational Issue and Implications,” International Journal of Geographic Information Systems (10:4), 1996, pp. 385–404.
Sahay, S., and Walsham, G. “Social Structure and Managerial Agency in India,” Organization Studies (18:3), 1997, pp. 415–444.
Schuler, D., and Namioka, A. “Preface,” in D. Schuler and A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, pp. xi–xiii.
Sehgal, J. L., and Abrol, I. P. “Land Degradation Status: India,” UNEP Desertification Bulletin (21), 1992, pp. 24–31.
Singh, P. “Globalisation Prospects: Realising an Agricultural Dream,” The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture 2002, The Hindu Group of Publications, Chennai, India, 2002, pp. 15–21.
Star, J., and Estes, J. Geographic Information Systems: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.
Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J. R. “Institutional Ecology,’ Translations,’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39,” Social Studies of Science (19), 1989, pp. 387–420.
Star, S. L., and Strauss, A. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (8), 1999, pp. 9–30.
Suchman, L. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (14:2), 2002, pp. 91–106.
Suchman L. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2), 1994, pp. 21–39.
Taylor, P. J. “Editorial Comment: GKS,” Political Geography Quarterly (9), 1990, pp. 211–12.
Verran, H. “Imagining Ownership—Working Disparate Knowledge Traditions Together,” Republica (3), 1995, pp. 99–108.
Verran, H. “Re-imagining Land Ownership in Australia,” Postcolonial Studies (1:2), 1998, pp. 237–254.
Walsham, G. “Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method,” European Journal of Information Systems (4), 1995, pp. 74–81.
WCMC. (World Conservation Monitoring Centre) Guide to Information Management in the Context of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puri, S.K., Sahay, S. (2004). The Politics of Knowledge in Using GIS for Land Management in India. In: Kaplan, B., Truex, D.P., Wastell, D., Wood-Harper, A.T., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 143. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8094-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8095-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive