This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M, & Simon, H. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11–13.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5–11.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26, 18–21.
Bereiter, B. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23, 4–12.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L., Ellery, S., & Campione, J. C. (1998). Creating zones of proximal development electronically. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 341–367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Bruce, J. (1996). Technology as social practice. Educational Foundations, 10, 51–58.
Bruce, B., & Peyton, J. K. (1990). A new writing environment and an old culture: A situated evaluation of computer networking to teach writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 171–191.
Bruce, B., & Peyton, J. K. (1993). A situated evaluation of ENFI. In B. Bruce, J. Peyton & T. Batson (Eds.), Networked-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 33–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brufee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–20.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). Culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999), Cognitive and situated learning: Perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–15.
Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175–190.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.
Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39, 250–256.
Coleman, J. (1999). Groupware: Collaboration and knowledge sharing. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), Knowledge Management: Handbook (12-1–12-15). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289–298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19) Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A. & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A., & Hakkarainen, K. (Eds.). (2001). European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning: The proceedings of the first European conference on computer-cupported collaborative learning. Maastricht: University of Maastricht.
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450.
Engelbart, D. C. (1973). Coordinated information services for a discipline-or mission-oriented community. Proceedings of the second annual computer communications conference. San Jose, CA, Retrieved August 7, 2003, from http://www.bootstrap.org/augment/AUGMENT/12445.htm
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studies in distributed working intelligence (Research bulletin 83). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of education.
Engeström, Y. (1999a). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999b). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 63–93.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). From paralyzing myths to expansive action: Building computer-supported knowledge work into curriculum from below. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 318–324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fichtner, B. (1984). Co-ordination, co-operation, and communication in the formation of theoretical concepts in instruction. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Learning and teaching on a scientific basis: Methodological and epistemological aspects of the activity theory of learning and teaching (pp. 207–227). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet, Psykologisk institut.
Greenberg, S. (Ed.). (1991). Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. New York: Academic Press.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher, 20, 5–17.
Greeno, J., & The Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 437–469.
Grudin, J. (1994). Computer-supported cooperative work: Its history and participation. IEEE Computer, 27, 19–26.
Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Järvelä, S., & Niemivirta, M. (1999). The interaction of motivational orientation and knowledge-seeking inquiry in computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 261–279.
Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2003). Patterns of female and male students’ participation in peer interaction in computer-supported learning. Computers & Education, 40, 327–342.
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (in press). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). Interrogative approach on inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science & Education, 11, 24–43.
Hall, R. (2001). Schedules of practical work for the analysis of case studies of learning and development. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 203–222.
Hoadley, C., & Linn, M. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussions: Speak Easy in the Knowledge Intergration Environment. Journal of Science Teaching, 22, 839–857.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ilyenkov, E. (1977). The concept of the ideal. In Philosophy in the USSR: Problems of dialectical materialism (pp. 71–99). Moscow: Progress. Retrieved August 7, 2003, from http://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/ideal/ideal.htm
Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning — the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10, 1–22.
Kling, R. (1991). Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 83–88
Kolodner, J., & Guzdial, M. (1996). Effects with and effects of CSCL: Tracking learning in a new paradigm. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 307–320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koschmann, T. (1994). Toward a theory of computer support for collaborative learning. Journal of the learning sciences, 3, 219–225.
Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996a). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koschmann, T. (1996b). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning (1999) conference (pp. 308–313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2002). CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Social uncertainty and collective paranoia in knowledge communities: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 163–191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer-interaction (pp. 16–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A review of research and development (The J.H.G.I Giesbers Reports on Education, 10). Netherlands: University of Nijmegen, Department of Educational Sciences.
Lemke, J. (2001). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 17–26.
Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building discourse: From facts to explanations in primary students’ computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3, 179–199.
Lipponen, L. (2001). Computer-supported collaborative learning: From promises to reality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku, series B, Humaniora, 245.
Lipponen, L., & Lallimo, J. (2003). From collaborative technology to collaborative use of technology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487–509.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 170–195.
Nardi, B., & O’Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Malley, C., & Scanlon, E. (1989). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Problem solving and distance education (Report No. 75). Milton Keynes, Great Britain: Open University, Centre for Information Technology in Education.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). The meaning of mediation in the epistemology of innovative knowledge communities. Paper presented at the tenth biannual conference of the European association for research in learning and instruction, Padova, Italy.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 24–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227–241.
Pea, R. D. (1996). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 171–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Piaget, J. (1928). The judgement and reasoning in children. London: Routledge and Kegan.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1991). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235–276.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of Learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.
Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 9–20.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in the knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practise. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–14.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Raami, A., Muukkonen, H., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Computer-support for collaborative designing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 181–202.
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.
Stahl. G. (Ed). (2002). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In R. Glaser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence: Volume II (pp. 37–54). London: Pinnan.
Suchman, L., Blomberg, J., Orr., J. E., Trigg, R. (1999). Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 392–408.
Sutler, B. (2002). Instruction at heart: Activity-theoretical studies of learning and development in coronary clinical work. Doctoral dissertation, Series No. 1. Kariskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation: Change and meaning in the age of the Internet. New York: Oxford University Press.
Veermans, M., & Tapola, A. (in press). Primary school students’ motivational profiles in longitudinal settings. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1930).
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
Wertsch, J., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E. Forman, N. Minick & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Context for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and Orientations of CSCL. In: Strijbos, JW., Kirschner, P.A., Martens, R.L. (eds) What We Know About CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7779-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7921-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive