Semantic Primitives: The Tip of the Iceberg

Part of the Text, Speech and Language Technology book series (TLTB, volume 36)

Semantic primitives have been central to Yorick’s approach to language processing. In this paper I review the development of his ideas on the nature and role of primitives, considering them both from the narrower system point of view and in the larger context to which Yorick himself always referred


Language Processing Natural Language Processing Machine Translation Ambiguity Resolution Dictionary Entry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boguraev, B.K. (1979) Automatic Resolution of Linguistic Ambiguities. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1979; Technical Report 11, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Boguraev, B.K. and Spärck Jones, K. (1983) How to Drive a Database Front End Using General Semantics. Proceedings of the Conference on Applied Language Analysis, Association for Computational Linguistics, 1983, 81–88.Google Scholar
  3. EWN (2005): EuroWordNet, see 2005).Google Scholar
  4. Fillmore, C.J. (1968) The Case for Case. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, 1–88.Google Scholar
  5. FN (2005): FrameNet, see October 2005).Google Scholar
  6. Herskovits, A. (1973) The Generation of French from a Semantic Representation. Memo STAN-CS-73-212, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Stanford University, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. LKB (2005): LKB, see (visited October 2005)Google Scholar
  8. Masterman, M. (2005) Language, Cohesion and Form. (ed. Y. Wilks), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. MN (2005): MindNet, see (visited October 2005).Google Scholar
  10. PB (2005): PropBank, see ace (visited October 2005).Google Scholar
  11. Procter, P. (1978) (ed.) Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Spärck Jones, K. (2000) R.H. Richens: Translation in the NUDE. In Hutchins, W.J. (ed.) Early Years in Machine Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000, 263–278.Google Scholar
  13. Spärck Jones, K. and Tait, J.I. (1984) Automatic Search Term Variant Generation. Journal of Documentation, 40, 1984, 55–66Google Scholar
  14. WN (2005): WordNet, see (visited October 2005).Google Scholar
  15. Wilks, Y. (1965) Computable Semantic Derivations. ML 176, Cambridge Language Research Unit, 1965 (see also Computable Semantic Derivations, Report SP-3017, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica CA, 1968, and Chapter 2 in Wilks (1972)).Google Scholar
  16. Wilks, Y. (1967) Semantic Consistency in Text – an Experiment. Report SP-2758/000/00, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica CA, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. Wilks, Y. (1971) Decidability and Natural Language. Mind, LXXX, 497–520.Google Scholar
  18. Wilks, Y. (1972a) Grammar, Meaning and the Machine Analysis of Language. London and Boston: Routledge, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. Wilks, Y. (1972b) Lakoff on Linguistics and Natural Logic. Memo STAN-CS-73-457, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Stanford University, 1972.Google Scholar
  20. Wilks, Y. and Herskovits, A. (1973) An Intelligent Analyser and Generator for Natural Language. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Pisa, l973, (ed. A. Zampolli). Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
  21. Wilks, Y. and Schank, R. (1974) The Goals of Linguistic Theory Revisited. Lingua, 34, 1974, —. (originally Memo STAN-CS-73-368, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Stanford University, 1973.)Google Scholar
  22. Wilks, Y. (1975a) Preference Semantics. In Keenan, E.L. (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, 329–348. (originally Memo STAN-CS-73-377, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Stanford University, 1973.)Google Scholar
  23. Wilks, Y. (1975b) An Intelligent Analyzer and Understander of English. Communications of the ACM, 18 (2), 1975, 264–274.Google Scholar
  24. Wilks, Y. (1975c) A Preferential, Pattern Seeking, Semantics for Natural Language Inference. Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1975, 53–74.Google Scholar
  25. Wilks, Y. (1975d) Primitives and Words. Proceedings of the Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (Tinlap), (ed. R. Schank and B. Nash-Webber). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1975, 38–41.Google Scholar
  26. Wilks, Y. (1977a) Good and Bad Arguments About Semantic Primitives. Communication and Cognition, 10 (3/4), 181–221.Google Scholar
  27. Wilks, Y. (1977b) What Sort of Taxonomy of Causation Do We Need for Language Understanding? Cognitive Science, 1, 1977, 235–264.Google Scholar
  28. Wilks, Y. (1978) Making Preferences More Active. Artificial Intelligence, 11, 1978,197–223, and in Findler, N.V. (ed.) Associative Networks. New York: Academic Press, 1979, 239–266.Google Scholar
  29. Wilks, Y. (1982) Some Thoughts on Procedural Semantics. In Lehnert, W.G. and Ringle, M.D. (eds.) Strategies for Natural Language Processing. Norwood NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, 495–516.Google Scholar
  30. Wilks, Y. (1983a) Does Anyone Really Still Believe This Sort Of Thing? In Sparck Jones, K. and Wilks, Y. (eds.) Automatic Natural Language Parsing. Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1983, 182–189.Google Scholar
  31. Wilks, Y. (1983b) Deep and Superficial Parsing. In King, M. (ed.) Parsing Natural Language, London: Academic Press, 1983, 216–246. Reprinted in Woods, W.A. and Fallside, F. (eds.) Computer Speech Processing. New York: Prentice Hall, 1985, 335–362.Google Scholar
  32. Fass, D. and Wilks, Y. (1983) Preference Semantics, Ill-Formedness, and Metaphor. Americal Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3/4), 1983, 178–187.Google Scholar
  33. Wilks, Y. et al. (1987) A Tractable Machine Dictionary as a Resource for Computational Semantics. Memo MCCS-87-105, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, 1987.Google Scholar
  34. Wilks, Y. et al. (1989) A Tractable Machine Dictionary as a Resource for Computatinal Semantics. In Boguraev, B. and Briscoe, T. (eds.) Computational Lexicography for Natural Language Processing. London: Longman, 1989, 193–228.Google Scholar
  35. Wilks, Y.A., Slator, B.M. and Guthrie, L.M. (1996) Electric Words. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations