Advertisement

Philosophical Engineering

Chapter
Part of the Text, Speech and Language Technology book series (TLTB, volume 36)

Keywords

Uniform Resource Identifier Computational Device Knowledge Representation Language IEEE Intelligent System Resource Description Framework Schema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and Masinter, L. 2005. Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax, IETF RFP 3986 (standards track), Internet Eng. Task Force, Jan. 2005; www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986Google Scholar
  2. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. 2001. The Semantic Web,Scientific Am., May 2001, pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
  3. Bodenreider, O., Smith, B., Kumar, A. and Burgun, A. 2004. ‘Investigating subsumption in DL-based terminologies: A Case Study in SNOMED CT’ in Proceedings of First International Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation (KR-MED 2004) Whistler, BC, Canada. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 102. 12–20.Google Scholar
  4. Brachman, R. and Levesque, H. 2004. Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar
  5. Brickley, D. and Guha, R.V. 2004. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, R.A. 1985. The rise of scientific engineering in Britain. British Journal for the History of Science, 18: 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasmahapatra, S., Dupplaw, D., Hu, B., Lewis, H., Lewis, P. and Shadbolt, N. 2006. Facilitating multi-disciplinary knowledge-based support for breast cancer screening. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 7(5): 403–420.Google Scholar
  8. Dasmahapatra, S. and O’Hara, K. 2005. ‘Interpretations of Ontologies for Breast Cancer’ Triple C 4(2): 293–303.Google Scholar
  9. Dupplaw, D., Dasmahapatra, S., Hu, B., Lewis, P. and Shadbolt, N. (in press). A Distributed, Service-Based Framework for Knowledge Applications With Multimedia. International Journal of Human Computer Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Dummett, M. 1991. Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fechner, R.E. 1997. History of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, in M. Siverstein (ed.) Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
  12. Feferman A. and Feferman S. 2004. Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Genesereth, M. and Nilsson, N. 1987. Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann: Los Altos, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Gower, B. 1997. Scientific Method, An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hendler, J.A. 2004. Frequently Asked Questions on W3C’s Web Ontology Language (OWL), www.w3.org/2003/08/owlfaqGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, D. 1984. A History of Engineering in Classical and Medieval Times. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  17. Hodges, W. 1997. A Shorter Model Theory. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-58713-1Google Scholar
  18. Hu, B., Dasmahapatra, S. and Shadbolt, N. 2003. From Lexicon To Mammographic Ontology: Experiences and Lessons. In: D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo and E. Franconi (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL’2003), pp. 229–233.Google Scholar
  19. Jordan, M. and Weiss, Y. 2002. Graphical Models: Probabilistic Inference. In: M. Arbib (Ed.), The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kirkham, R. 1992. Theories of Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. 1962. The Development of Logic. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition 1970. 3rd edition, 1996.Google Scholar
  23. Masolo, C., Bango, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N. and Oltramari, A. 2003. “Wonderweb Deliverable D18 – Ontology Library”.Google Scholar
  24. NHS, 1997. National co-ordinating group for breast screening pathology. Pathology Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening, Sheffield. Available from http://www .cancerscreening .nhs .uk /breastscreen /publications /qa-07.html.Google Scholar
  25. Nirenburg, S. and Wilks, Y. 2001. What’s in a symbol: ontology, representation and language. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence 13(1): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quine, W., 1953. On What There is. In: From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  27. Rae, J.B. and Volti, R. 1993. The Engineer in History. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Rumelhart D.E. and McClelland J.L. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  29. Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T. and Hall, W. 2006. The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems, May/June.Google Scholar
  30. Tarski, A. 1994. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences (new edition of book originally published in Polish in 1936), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Waismann, F. 1945. Are There Alternative Logics? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
  32. Waismann, F. 1968. Verifiability. In: Anthony F. (Ed.), Logic and Language., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Wilks, Y. 1990. Form and Content in Semantics. In: Synthese, 81, 373–389, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Reprinted In J. Fetzer (Ed.), Epistemology and Cognition. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1991 and In R. Johnson and M. Rosner (Eds.), Advances in Formal Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. Wilks, Y. and Ballim, A. 1991. Artificial Believers. Norwood, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Wilks, Y. 2004. Are ontologies distinctive enough for computations over knowledge? In IEEE Intelligent Systems, Trends and Controversies.Google Scholar
  36. Wilks, Y. 2005. What Would a Wittgensteinian Linguistics be Like? In Proceedings 9th International Conference on Pragmatics, Lake Garda.Google Scholar
  37. Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922 translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961)Google Scholar
  38. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations 1953, G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (Eds.), G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Ziman, J. 2000. Real Science What it is and What it Means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronics & Computer ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations