Skip to main content

This chapter presents the area of nonverbal (NV) behavior as it relates to teacher-student interaction, particularly in higher education. The first part covers research topics in NV psychology, the repertoire of NV behaviors, and topics of NV research pertinent to teaching. Microteaching is then discussed as a major application in teacher training involving NV behavior. The central part focuses on instructors’ NV behavior and its effects on students. The ‘‘teacher enthusiasm’’ and ‘‘teacher immediacy’’ conceptualizations and research literatures are then discussed, wondering about their alienated isolation from each other, because both deal with the very same phenomenon of the contribution of instructors’ NV enthusiasm to their teaching quality. Research on specifically-measured instructors’ NV behaviors (opposed to global NV conduct as perceived by students) is then presented, demonstrating how thin slices (10 seconds) of teachers’ NV behavior can predict student evaluations, and illuminating the NV profile of effective instructors

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P., Leventhal, L., and Perry, R. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 52: 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D., and Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., Bernieri F., and Richeson, J. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: judgmental accuracy from this slices of the behavioral stream. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). Boston: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., and Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 111: 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., and Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. (1978). The Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Teaching Effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D., and Costanzo., M. (1988). The Interpersonal Perception Task. Berkeley, CA: University of California Extension Media Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (1993). Teachers’ differential behavior. Educational Psychology Review 5: 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (1999). Preferential treatment in television interviewing: Evidence from nonverbal behavior. Political Communication 16: 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (2005a). Nonverbal behavior in education. In J. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal and K. Scherer (eds.), The New Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research (pp. 283–311). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (2005b). Guessing teachers’ differential treatment of high- and low achievers from thin slices of their public lecturing behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 29: 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (2005c). The psychological price of media bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11: 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., and Rosenthal, R. (2003). Teachers’ brief nonverbal behaviors in defined instructional situations can predict students’ evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., and Rosenthal, R. (2004) Prediction of student’s evaluations from professors’ nonverbal behavior in defined instructional situations. Social Psychology of Education 7: 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., Bernieri, F., and Rosenthal, R. (1989). When less information is more informative: Diagnosing teacher expectancies from brief samples of behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology 59: 281–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., Bernieri, F., and Rosenthal, R. (1991). Students as judges of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal behavior. American Educational Research Journal 28: 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., and Taylor, P. (1992). Transparency of teacher expectations across language, cultural boundaries. Journal of Educational Research 86: 120–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck P., Rosenthal, R., and Cordell, L. (1985). The appearance of justice: Judges’ verbal and nonverbal behavior in criminal jury trials. Stanford Law Review 38: 89–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (1975). Microteaching: A Program of Teaching Skills. London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophel, D. (1990a). The Relationships among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophel, D. (1990b). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education 37: 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. (1990). Bringing research into practice. In M. Theall and J. Franklin (eds.), Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice (pp. 123–132). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, J., Rowell, E., and Bowers, J. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education 44: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., and Good, T. (1983). Pygmalion Grows Up: Studies in the Expectation Communication Process. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo, M., and Archer, D. (1993). The Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15) [Videotape] Berkeley: University of California Extension Media Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1976). Research on Classroom and Schools: Formulation of Questions, Design and Analysis. Stanford evaluation consortium, Eric document no. ED 135 801, Stanford University, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin 111: 203–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B., and Friedman, H. (1988). Nonverbal communication. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th edition, pp. 3–40). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for teacher education research. In L. Shulman (ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 5, pp. 163–198). Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1981). Research on classroom contexts. Journal of Teacher Education 32: 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research 53: 159–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. (1969a). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usages and coding. Semiotica 1: 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. (1969b). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry 32: 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologistm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, T. (2002), Evidence of halo effects in students evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education 51: 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (1985). Nonverbal behavior, race, and the classroom teacher. Theory into Practice 24: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R., and Saletzky, R. (1986). Nonverbal communication in interracial teacher-student interaction. In R. Feldman (ed.), The Social Psychology of Education: Current Research and Theory (pp. 115–131). NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. (1979). A philosophical consideration if recent research on teaching effectiveness. Review of Research in Education 6: 157–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gada-Jain, N. (1999). Intentional Synchrony Effects on Job Interview Evaluation, Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Toledo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, C. (1984). Nonverbal behavior and teacher-student relationships: An intercultural perspective. In A. Wolfgang (ed.), Nonverbal Behavior: Perspectives, Applications, and Intercultural Insights (pp. 411–430). Toronto: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., and Gillmore, S. (1977a). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 743–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., and Gillmore, S. (1977b). Grading leniency is a removable containment of student ratings. American Psychologist 52: 1209–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 97: 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and Rosenthal, R. (2005). No more teachers’ dirty looks: Effects of teacher nonverbal behavior on student outcomes. In R. Riggio and R.S. Feldman (eds.), Applications of Nonverbal Communication (pp. 157–192).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. (1995). Naturally occurring expectation effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunnicutt, V. (1999). Training in the use of selected nonverbal behaviors to reduce student disruptions in the classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. US, 1999 April 59 (10-A): p. 3726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., and Miller, A., (2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility & learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education 51: 280–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinzing, H. (1983). Effects of a training program on expressive non-verbal behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Canada, April 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinzing, H., and Jackson, I. (1987). Training teachers in nonverbal sensitivity and nonverbal behavior. International Journal of Educational Research 11: 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. (1978). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction ( 2nd edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. (1984). Student evaluation of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 707–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. (1987). Students’ Evaluation of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues and Directions for Future Research. Elmford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., and Roche, L. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluation of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology 92: 202–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., and Ware, J. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content, coverage and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, P., and Richmond, J. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. Richmond and J. McCroskey (eds.), Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control and Concern (pp. 101–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J., Richmond, V., and Barraclough, R. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy & cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education 45: 200–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, C., Larkins, A., Kazelkis, R., Ford, M., Allen, J., and Burts, D. (1983). Some effects of teacher enthusiasm on student achievement in fourth grade social studies: Journal of Educational Research 76: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation 1: 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent Messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., and Glynn, T. (1984). Variation in question rate as a function of position in the classroom. Educational Psychology 4: 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. (1983a). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and students’ ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H (1983b). Low- inference classroom teaching behaviors in relation to six measures of college teaching effectiveness. In J.G. Donald (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on the Evaluation and Improvement of University Teaching: The Canadian Experience. Montreal: Center for Teaching and Learning Services, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H., and Lawrence, C. (1980). Speech and drama training for lectures as a means of improving university teaching. Research in Higher Education 13: 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S., Zhong, M., and Guan, S. (1998). Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom. Communication Studies 49: 240–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naftulin, D., Ware, J., and Donnelly, F. (1973). The doctor fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education 48: 630–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neulip, J.W. (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American & Euro-American classrooms. Communication Education 44: 267–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neulip, J.W. (1997). A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Communication Research 24: 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrott, E. (1977). Microteaching in Higher Education: Research, Development and Practice. Surrey, GB: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. (1990). Introduction to the special section. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R., Abrami, P., and Leventhal, L., (1979). Educational seduction: The effect of instructor expressiveness & lecture content on student rating and achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R., and Magnuson, J. (1987). Effective instruction and students’ perception of control in the college classroom: Multiple-lecture effects. Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R., and Penner, K. (1990). Enhancing academic achievement in college students through attributional retraining and instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pribyl, C., Sakamoto, M., and Keaten, J. (2004). The relationship between nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and perceived cognitive learning among Japanese college students. Japanese Psychological Research 46: 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V., Gorham, J., and McCroskey, J. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 547–590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V., McCorskey, J., Plax, T., and Kearney, P. (1986). Teacher nonverbal immediacy training and student affect. World Communication 15: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, K., and Byrne P. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American & German classrooms. Communication Education 50: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., Blanck, P., and Vannicelli, M. (1984). Speaking to and about patients: Predicting tone of voice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 679–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., Hall, J., Archer, D., DiMatto, M., and Rogers, P. (1979). The Pons Test Manual: Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity. New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., and Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, M., and Gendrin, D. (2003). The impact of ethnic identification on student learning in the HBCU classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology 30: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonwetter, D., Perry, R., and Struthers, C. (1994). Student perceptions of control and success in college classroom: Affects and achievement in different instructional conditions. Journal of Experimental Education 61: 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (1984). Nonverbal behavior aspects of teaching. In A. Wolfgang (ed.), Nonverbal Behavior: Perspectives, Applications, Intercultural Insights (pp. 171–202). Toronto: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, G. (1980). The Relationship between Teachers’ Self-disclosive Statement and Student Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, B. (1986). The effect of training experienced teachers in enthusiasm on students’ attitudes toward reading: Reading Psychology 7: 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theall, M., and Franklin, J. (eds.). (1990). Student Rating of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice. (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No.43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J., and Williams, R. (1975). The Dr. Fox effect: A study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction. Journal of Medical Education 40: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P. (2003). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and cognitive learning in video instruction. Dissertation abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. Vol 63 (9-A): p. 3060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P., and Wheeless, L.(2001). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education 50: 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P., Wheeless, L., and Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs 71: 184–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (1998). The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student motivation, selective attention, and text memory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario. Dissertation abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. US, 1999 March 59 (9-A): p. 3355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A., and Galloway, C. (1985). Nonverbal communication and the study of teaching. Theory Into Practice 24: 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, W. (1973). The effect of stimulus variation on learning from lecture. Journal of Experimental Education 41: 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B., and Rosenthal, R. (1986). Humans as deceivers and lie detectors. In P. Blanck, R. Buck and R. Rosenthal (eds.), Nonverbal Communication in the Clinical Context (pp. 13–35). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Babad, E. (2007). Teachers’ Nonverbal Behavior and its Effects on Students. In: Perry, R.P., Smart, J.C. (eds) The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics