This chapter presents the area of nonverbal (NV) behavior as it relates to teacher-student interaction, particularly in higher education. The first part covers research topics in NV psychology, the repertoire of NV behaviors, and topics of NV research pertinent to teaching. Microteaching is then discussed as a major application in teacher training involving NV behavior. The central part focuses on instructors’ NV behavior and its effects on students. The ‘‘teacher enthusiasm’’ and ‘‘teacher immediacy’’ conceptualizations and research literatures are then discussed, wondering about their alienated isolation from each other, because both deal with the very same phenomenon of the contribution of instructors’ NV enthusiasm to their teaching quality. Research on specifically-measured instructors’ NV behaviors (opposed to global NV conduct as perceived by students) is then presented, demonstrating how thin slices (10 seconds) of teachers’ NV behavior can predict student evaluations, and illuminating the NV profile of effective instructors


Nonverbal (NV) behavior NV psychology teacher enthusiasm teacher immediacy Doctor Fox research instructors’ NV behavior teachers’ NV behavior thin slices research students’ ratings of teaching (SRT) students’ evaluations of teaching (SET) microteaching teacher-student interaction effective teaching micro-analysis NV profile of effective instructors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrami, P., Leventhal, L., and Perry, R. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 52: 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D., and Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsey.Google Scholar
  3. Ambady, N., Bernieri F., and Richeson, J. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: judgmental accuracy from this slices of the behavioral stream. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ambady, N., and Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 111: 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambady, N., and Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen, J. (1978). The Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Teaching Effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va.Google Scholar
  7. Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  8. Archer, D., and Costanzo., M. (1988). The Interpersonal Perception Task. Berkeley, CA: University of California Extension Media Center.Google Scholar
  9. Babad, E. (1993). Teachers’ differential behavior. Educational Psychology Review 5: 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Babad, E. (1999). Preferential treatment in television interviewing: Evidence from nonverbal behavior. Political Communication 16: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Babad, E. (2005a). Nonverbal behavior in education. In J. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal and K. Scherer (eds.), The New Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research (pp. 283–311). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Babad, E. (2005b). Guessing teachers’ differential treatment of high- and low achievers from thin slices of their public lecturing behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 29: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Babad, E. (2005c). The psychological price of media bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11: 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., and Rosenthal, R. (2003). Teachers’ brief nonverbal behaviors in defined instructional situations can predict students’ evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 553–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., and Rosenthal, R. (2004) Prediction of student’s evaluations from professors’ nonverbal behavior in defined instructional situations. Social Psychology of Education 7: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Babad, E., Bernieri, F., and Rosenthal, R. (1989). When less information is more informative: Diagnosing teacher expectancies from brief samples of behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology 59: 281–195.Google Scholar
  17. Babad, E., Bernieri, F., and Rosenthal, R. (1991). Students as judges of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal behavior. American Educational Research Journal 28: 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Babad, E., and Taylor, P. (1992). Transparency of teacher expectations across language, cultural boundaries. Journal of Educational Research 86: 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Blanck P., Rosenthal, R., and Cordell, L. (1985). The appearance of justice: Judges’ verbal and nonverbal behavior in criminal jury trials. Stanford Law Review 38: 89–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 631–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, G. (1975). Microteaching: A Program of Teaching Skills. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  23. Christophel, D. (1990a). The Relationships among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va.Google Scholar
  24. Christophel, D. (1990b). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education 37: 323–340.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, P. (1990). Bringing research into practice. In M. Theall and J. Franklin (eds.), Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice (pp. 123–132). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., and Bowers, J. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education 44: 251–266.Google Scholar
  27. Cooper, H., and Good, T. (1983). Pygmalion Grows Up: Studies in the Expectation Communication Process. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Costanzo, M., and Archer, D. (1993). The Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15) [Videotape] Berkeley: University of California Extension Media Center.Google Scholar
  29. Cronbach, L. (1976). Research on Classroom and Schools: Formulation of Questions, Design and Analysis. Stanford evaluation consortium, Eric document no. ED 135 801, Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
  30. DePaulo, B. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin 111: 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. DePaulo, B., and Friedman, H. (1988). Nonverbal communication. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th edition, pp. 3–40). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for teacher education research. In L. Shulman (ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 5, pp. 163–198). Itasca, IL: Peacock.Google Scholar
  33. Doyle, W. (1981). Research on classroom contexts. Journal of Teacher Education 32: 3–6Google Scholar
  34. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research 53: 159–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. (1969a). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usages and coding. Semiotica 1: 49–98.Google Scholar
  37. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. (1969b). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry 32: 88–106.Google Scholar
  38. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologistm Press.Google Scholar
  39. Feeley, T. (2002), Evidence of halo effects in students evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education 51: 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Feldman, R. (1985). Nonverbal behavior, race, and the classroom teacher. Theory into Practice 24: 45–49.Google Scholar
  41. Feldman, R., and Saletzky, R. (1986). Nonverbal communication in interracial teacher-student interaction. In R. Feldman (ed.), The Social Psychology of Education: Current Research and Theory (pp. 115–131). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Fenstermacher, G. (1979). A philosophical consideration if recent research on teaching effectiveness. Review of Research in Education 6: 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gada-Jain, N. (1999). Intentional Synchrony Effects on Job Interview Evaluation, Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Toledo.Google Scholar
  44. Galloway, C. (1984). Nonverbal behavior and teacher-student relationships: An intercultural perspective. In A. Wolfgang (ed.), Nonverbal Behavior: Perspectives, Applications, and Intercultural Insights (pp. 411–430). Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  45. Greenwald, A., and Gillmore, S. (1977a). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greenwald, A., and Gillmore, S. (1977b). Grading leniency is a removable containment of student ratings. American Psychologist 52: 1209–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harris, M., and Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 97: 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harris, M., and Rosenthal, R. (2005). No more teachers’ dirty looks: Effects of teacher nonverbal behavior on student outcomes. In R. Riggio and R.S. Feldman (eds.), Applications of Nonverbal Communication (pp. 157–192).Google Scholar
  49. Hart, A. (1995). Naturally occurring expectation effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hunnicutt, V. (1999). Training in the use of selected nonverbal behaviors to reduce student disruptions in the classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. US, 1999 April 59 (10-A): p. 3726.Google Scholar
  51. Johnson, S., and Miller, A., (2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility & learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education 51: 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klinzing, H. (1983). Effects of a training program on expressive non-verbal behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Canada, April 1983).Google Scholar
  53. Klinzing, H., and Jackson, I. (1987). Training teachers in nonverbal sensitivity and nonverbal behavior. International Journal of Educational Research 11: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Knapp, M. (1978). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction ( 2nd edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  55. Marsh, H. (1984). Student evaluation of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 707–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marsh, H. (1987). Students’ Evaluation of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues and Directions for Future Research. Elmford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  57. Marsh, H., and Roche, L. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluation of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology 92: 202–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marsh, H., and Ware, J. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content, coverage and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McCroskey, P., and Richmond, J. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. Richmond and J. McCroskey (eds.), Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control and Concern (pp. 101–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. McCroskey, J., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J., Richmond, V., and Barraclough, R. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy & cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education 45: 200–211.Google Scholar
  61. McKinney, C., Larkins, A., Kazelkis, R., Ford, M., Allen, J., and Burts, D. (1983). Some effects of teacher enthusiasm on student achievement in fourth grade social studies: Journal of Educational Research 76: 249–253.Google Scholar
  62. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation 1: 213–217.Google Scholar
  63. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent Messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  64. Moore, D., and Glynn, T. (1984). Variation in question rate as a function of position in the classroom. Educational Psychology 4: 233–248.Google Scholar
  65. Murray, H. (1983a). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and students’ ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Murray, H (1983b). Low- inference classroom teaching behaviors in relation to six measures of college teaching effectiveness. In J.G. Donald (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on the Evaluation and Improvement of University Teaching: The Canadian Experience. Montreal: Center for Teaching and Learning Services, McGill University.Google Scholar
  67. Murray, H., and Lawrence, C. (1980). Speech and drama training for lectures as a means of improving university teaching. Research in Higher Education 13: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Myers, S., Zhong, M., and Guan, S. (1998). Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom. Communication Studies 49: 240–254.Google Scholar
  69. Naftulin, D., Ware, J., and Donnelly, F. (1973). The doctor fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education 48: 630–635.Google Scholar
  70. Neulip, J.W. (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American & Euro-American classrooms. Communication Education 44: 267–267.Google Scholar
  71. Neulip, J.W. (1997). A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Communication Research 24: 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Perrott, E. (1977). Microteaching in Higher Education: Research, Development and Practice. Surrey, GB: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  73. Perry, R. (1990). Introduction to the special section. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perry, R., Abrami, P., and Leventhal, L., (1979). Educational seduction: The effect of instructor expressiveness & lecture content on student rating and achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Perry, R., and Magnuson, J. (1987). Effective instruction and students’ perception of control in the college classroom: Multiple-lecture effects. Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Perry, R., and Penner, K. (1990). Enhancing academic achievement in college students through attributional retraining and instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pribyl, C., Sakamoto, M., and Keaten, J. (2004). The relationship between nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and perceived cognitive learning among Japanese college students. Japanese Psychological Research 46: 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Richmond, V., Gorham, J., and McCroskey, J. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 547–590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Richmond, V., McCorskey, J., Plax, T., and Kearney, P. (1986). Teacher nonverbal immediacy training and student affect. World Communication 15: 181–194.Google Scholar
  80. Roach, K., and Byrne P. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American & German classrooms. Communication Education 50: 1–14.Google Scholar
  81. Rosenthal, R., Blanck, P., and Vannicelli, M. (1984). Speaking to and about patients: Predicting tone of voice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rosenthal, R., Hall, J., Archer, D., DiMatto, M., and Rogers, P. (1979). The Pons Test Manual: Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. Rosenthal, R., and Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  84. Rucker, M., and Gendrin, D. (2003). The impact of ethnic identification on student learning in the HBCU classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology 30: 207–215.Google Scholar
  85. Schonwetter, D., Perry, R., and Struthers, C. (1994). Student perceptions of control and success in college classroom: Affects and achievement in different instructional conditions. Journal of Experimental Education 61: 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith, H. (1984). Nonverbal behavior aspects of teaching. In A. Wolfgang (ed.), Nonverbal Behavior: Perspectives, Applications, Intercultural Insights (pp. 171–202). Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  87. Sorensen, G. (1980). The Relationship between Teachers’ Self-disclosive Statement and Student Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va.Google Scholar
  88. Streeter, B. (1986). The effect of training experienced teachers in enthusiasm on students’ attitudes toward reading: Reading Psychology 7: 249–259.Google Scholar
  89. Theall, M., and Franklin, J. (eds.). (1990). Student Rating of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice. (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No.43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  90. Ware, J., and Williams, R. (1975). The Dr. Fox effect: A study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction. Journal of Medical Education 40: 149–156.Google Scholar
  91. Witt, P. (2003). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and cognitive learning in video instruction. Dissertation abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. Vol 63 (9-A): p. 3060.Google Scholar
  92. Witt, P., and Wheeless, L.(2001). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education 50: 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Witt, P., Wheeless, L., and Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs 71: 184–207.Google Scholar
  94. Wood, A. (1998). The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student motivation, selective attention, and text memory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario. Dissertation abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. US, 1999 March 59 (9-A): p. 3355.Google Scholar
  95. Woolfolk, A., and Galloway, C. (1985). Nonverbal communication and the study of teaching. Theory Into Practice 24: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wyckoff, W. (1973). The effect of stimulus variation on learning from lecture. Journal of Experimental Education 41: 85–90.Google Scholar
  97. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B., and Rosenthal, R. (1986). Humans as deceivers and lie detectors. In P. Blanck, R. Buck and R. Rosenthal (eds.), Nonverbal Communication in the Clinical Context (pp. 13–35). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisha Babad
    • 1
  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations