Abstract
Despite more than 80 years of wheat genetic studies, only several hundred genes out of the probable 120,000 coding sequences that are presumed present in the wheat genome have been mapped to chromosomes. Many fewer have been associated with traits, and very many fewer have been cloned and their mechanisms and mode of action elucidated. This past failure has been due to the complexity of the hexaploid wheat genome of more that 16,000 million base pairs, but also the paucity of molecular tools and investment relative to other agricultural species such as rice or maize. Fortunately, in recent years, the pace of gene discovery has greatly accelerated in wheat because of the development of molecular tools, including molecular marker based genetic maps, libraries of sequence, particularly ESTs, and microarrays. Most recently a BAC library covering the whole wheat genome in the model variety Chinese Spring has been constructed
QTL and major gene discovery by forward genetics is now routine and a catalogue of mapped genes for both simple and complex traits is being accumulated. This is leading to plant breeding applications through marker-assisted selection and detailed genetical understanding in terms of trait architecture and genetic diversity. However, the knowledge of mechanisms by which mapped genes work is rare since cloning genes in the complex wheat genome is still a major undertaking both in terms of time and resources. Gene isolation by chromosome walking is the most direct, but also the most difficult route. But the feasibility of this has now been demonstrated for key genes, such as the Ph1 locus controlling homoeologous chromosome pairing. However, the resource implications indicate that only a few key genes are important enough for the investment, and short cuts through other approaches are generally necessary. Most commonly this involves isolating orthologues from model species, usually Arabidopsis and rice. This is possible, but examples show that it does not always work or is meaningful to do. Because of this, there is increasing interest in sequencing the whole genome, although a daunting undertaking in terms of cost and effort. However, sequencing other model species, such as the small grass, Brachypodium, can provide a useful substitute for wheat gene content, as well as providing closely linked markers for chromosome walking. Moreover, a comparison of the corresponding regions between rice and Brachypodium will enable wheat genes to be clearly identified and annotated
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allouis S, Moore G, Bellec A, Sharp R, Faivre Rampant P, Mortimer K, Pateyron S, Foote TN, Griffiths S, Caboche M, Chalhoub B (2003) Construction and characterisation of a hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) BAC library from the reference germplasm ‘‘Chinese Spring’’. Cereals Res Commun 31:331–337
Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote TN, Bertin I, Wanous M, Reader S, Colas I, Moore G (2006) Molecular characterisation of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439:749–752
Hayden MJ, Sharp PJ (2001) Targeted development of informative microsatellite (SSR) markers. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e44
Hayden MJ, Stephenson P, Logojan AM, Khatkar D, Rogers C, Elsden J, Koebner RMD, Snape JW, Sharp PJ (2006) Development and genetic mapping of sequence tagged microsatellites (STMs) in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet (in press)
Jaccoud D, Peng J, Feinstein K, Kilian A (2001) Diversity Arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e25
Koebner RMD, Summers R (2003). 21st century wheat breeding: selection in plots or detection in plates. Trends Biotechnol 21:59–63
Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Flintham JE, Beales J, Fish LJ, Worland AJ, Pelica F, Sudhakar D, Christou P, Snape JW, Gale MD, Harberd NP (1999) ’Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400:256–261
Safar J, Bartos J, Janda J et al (2004) Dissecting large and complex genomes: flow sorting and BAC cloning of individual chromosome types from bread wheat. Plant J 39:960–968
Snape JW, Foulkes MJ, Simmonds J, Leverington M, Fish LJ, Wang Y, Ciavarrella M (2006) Dissecting environmental effects on wheat yields via QTL and physiological analysis. Euphytica (in press)
Somers DJ, Isaac P, Edwards K (2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 109:1105–1114
Sorrells ME, La Rota CM et al (2003) Comparative DNA sequence analysis of wheat and rice genomes. Genome Res 13:1818–1827
Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA (2005) The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 310:1031–1034
Yan L, Loukoianov A, Tranquilli G, Helguera M, Fahima T, Dubcovsky J (2003) Positional cloning of wheat vernalization gene VRN1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6263–6268
Yan L, Loukoianov A, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Ramakrishna W, SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL, Echenique V, Dubcovsky J (2004) The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science 303:1640–1644
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Snape, J.W., Moore, G. (2007). Reflections and Opportunities: Gene Discovery in the Complex Wheat Genome. In: Buck, H.T., Nisi, J.E., Salomón, N. (eds) Wheat Production in Stressed Environments. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_82
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5496-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5497-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)