Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adamowicz, W, Swait, J, Boxall, P Louviere, J, M Williams (1997) Perception versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32:65–84
Alberini, A (1995) Testing Willingness-to-Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data, Land Economics, 71:83–95
Bergstrom, JC, De Civita P (1999) Satus of benefits transfer in the United States and Canada: a review, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47:79–87
Bergstrom, JC, Boyle KJ, Poe GL (eds) (2000), The Economic Valuation of Water Quality Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA
Bishop RC, Champ P, Mullarkey D (1995) Contingent Valuation, in Handbook of Environmental Economics, Bromley DW (ed.), Basil Blackwell Publisher, London
Cameron TA, James MD (1987) Efficient Estimation Methods for “closed-ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys, Review of Economics and Statistics, May, LXIX(2):269–276
Downing M, Ozuna T (1996) Testing the reliability of the benefit transfer approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30:316–322
Feather P, Hellerstein D (1997) Calibrating Benefit function transfer to assess the conservation reserve program, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79:151–162
Hanemann MW, Loomis J, Kanninen B (1991) Statistical Efficiency of Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, November, 73(4):1255–1263
Hanemann WM (1984), Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuations Experiments with Discrete Responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66:332–341
Hanemann WM, 1989, Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuations Experiments with Discrete Response data: a reply American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71:1057–1061
Kirchhoff S, Colby BG, LaFrance JT (1997) Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33(1):75–93
Krinsky I, Robb A (1986) Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 68:715–719
Kristofersson D, Navrud S (2002) Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer: Are we performing the wrong tests? Paper presentated at the 2nd World Congress for Environmental and Resource Economists, June 24–27 2002 Monterey, California, USA
Loomis J, Roach B, Ward F, Ready R (1995) Testing transferability of recreation demand models across regions - A study of corps of engineer reservoirs, Water Resources Research, 31(3): 721–730
Morrison M, Bennett J, Blamey R, Louviere J (2002) Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1):161–170
Navrud S, Pruckner GJ (1997) Environmental valuation – To use or not to use? A comparative study of the United States and Europe, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10:1–26
Ni Dhubhain A, Gardiner J, Davis J, Hutchinson G, Chilton S, Thomson K, Psaltopoulos D, Anderson C (1994) Final Report EU CAMAR Contract No 8001-CT90-0008 The Socio-Economic Impact of Afforestation on Rural Development, by University College of Dublin, The Queens University of Belfast and University of Aberdeen
Opaluch JJ, Mazzotta MJ (1992) Fundamental issues in benefit transfer and natural resource damage assessment, in Benefit transfer: procedures, problems and research needs Workshop proceedings, AERE, Snowbird, UT, June
Poe GL, Severance-Lossin EK, Welsh MP (1994) Measuring the difference (X - Y) of simulated distributions: a convolutions approach, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76: 904–915
Poe GL, Welsh MP, Champ PA (1995) Measuring the difference in mean WTP when dichotomous choice contingent valuation responses are not independent, Land Economics, 73:255–267
Santos JML (1998) The economic valuation of landscape change, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar
Scarpa R, Hutchinson G, Chilton S, Buongiorno, J (2000) Reliability of Benefit Value Transfers from Contingent Valuation Data with Forest-Specific Attributes, FEEM Working Paper n 3400
Scarpa R, Hutchinson WG, Chilton SM, Buongiorno J (2000) Importance of Forest Attributes in the Willingness To Pay for Recreation: A Contingent Valuation Study of Irish Forests, Forest Policy and Economics, 1(3–4):315–329
Smith VK, Van Houtven G, Pattanayak SK (2002) Benefit Transfer via Preference Calibration: “Prudential Algebra” for Policy, Land Economics, 78(1):132–152
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scarpa, R., Hutchinson, W., Chilton, S., Buongiorno, J. (2007). Benefit Value Transfers Conditional On Site Attributes: Some Evidence Of Reliability From Forest Recreation In Ireland. In: Navrud, S., Ready, R. (eds) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5405-X_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5405-X_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4081-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5405-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)