Skip to main content

Review of Methods for Value Transfer

  • Chapter

Part of the The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources book series (ENGO,volume 9)

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bergland O, Magnussen K, Navrud S(1995) Benefit Transfer: Testing for Accuracy and Reliability. Discussion Paper #D-03/1995, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle KJ, Poe GL, Bergstrom JC (1994) What Do We Know About Groundwater Values? Preliminary Implications from a Meta Analysis of Contingent Valuation Studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (5):1055–1061.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R, Langford IH, Bateman IJ, Turner RK (1999) A Meta-Analysis of Wetland Contingent Valuation Studies. Regional Environmental Change 1 (1):47–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carson R, Flores N, Martin K, Wright J (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: Comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics 72 (1):80–99.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges WH, Johnson FR, Banzhaf HS (1998) Environmental Policy Analysis With Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing M, Ozuna T (1996) Testing the Feasibility of Intertemporal Benefits Transfers Within and Across Geographic Regions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (3):316–322.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson F, Reed, Fries Erin E, Spencer Banzhaf H (1997) Valuing Morbidity: An Integration of the Willingness-to-Pay and Health-Status Index Literatures. Journal of Health Economics 16:641–665.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB (1992) The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer. Water Resources Research 28 (3):701–705.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J., White D (1996) Economic Benefits of Rare and Endangered Species: Summary and Meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18 (3):197–206.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen K (1993) Mini meta analysis of Norwegian water quality improvements valuation studies. Unpublished manuscript, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, 29 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger RS, Loomis JB (2003) Benefit Transfer. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 445–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozan A (2004) Benefit Transfer: A comparison of WTP for Air Quality between France and Germany. Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 295–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper Y, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1998) Why do aircraft noise value estimates differ? A meta-analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management 4:117–124.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK, Huang J (1995) Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Models. Journal of Political Economy 103 (1):209–227.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK, Kaoru Y (1990) Signals or Noise?: Explaining the Variation in Recreation Benefit Estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (2):419–433.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK, Osborne L (1996) Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a Scope Test?: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (3):287–301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant LA, Johnson FR, Desvousges WH (1998) A Meta-analysis of Recreational Fishing. Unpublished Manuscript. Triangle Economic Research, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh RG, Johnson DM, McKean JR (1990) Nonmarket values from two decades of research on recreation demand. In: Smith VK, Link AN (eds) Advances in applied micro-economics, Vol. 5$.$ JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT, pp 167–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh RG, Johnson DM, McKean JR (1992) Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Demand Studies, 1968–1988. Water Resources Research 28 (3):707–713.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Navrud, S., Ready, R. (2007). Review of Methods for Value Transfer. In: Navrud, S., Ready, R. (eds) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5405-X_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics