Skip to main content

From thermodynamic efficiency to eco-efficiency

  • Chapter

Part of the Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science book series (ECOE,volume 22)

Abstract

According to Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, efficiency is (1) the quality of being efficient or producing an effect or effects and (2) (in the context of mechanics) the ratio of useful work to energy expended. The first description obviously relates to more everyday language than the more science-focussed second description. This second one, however, is restricted to mechanics and thermodynamics. The efficiency concept is also used in economics, but there it appears to indicate the state of optimality, and not a quantifiable degree of optimality.

There is as yet no unambiguous and generally accepted definition of eco-efficiency. Obviously, eco-efficiency is a term that has emerged from everyday, rather than scientific arguments. It is, however, equally obvious that eco-efficiency should in the course of time, and in its development into a quantifiable and communicable term, be further specified on a scientific basis. Admittedly, consensus seems to be growing that an eco-efficiency indicator expresses the ratio between an environmental and a financial variable, witness the various texts by Schaltegger, the WBCSD, the OECD and the UN. But there is still much confusion.

This paper argues that this confusion may be due to an unconventional use of the term ‘efficiency’. In order to develop a better understanding of the exact meaning of eco-efficiency, it reviews the thermodynamic origins of the efficiency concept. This serves as a point of departure for a generalisation of this concept to a form that will accommodate eco-efficiency as well.~~~The interpretations of the term efficiency in the economic vocabulary are also reviewed in this context. I then present an axiomatic scheme for an efficiency indicator, on the basis of a ratio of input to output exergy. Its usefulness is illustrated by an example relating to iron production. Finally, the paper shows that the ‘economy–environment ratio’ – even though it is not an actual efficiency or eco-efficiency – is still a useful indicator. I propose to call this the ‘eco-productivity’.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adkins CJ (1983) Equilibrium thermodynamics. Third edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen B (1990) Finite-time thermodynamics. In: Sieniutycz S, Salamon P (eds). Finite-time thermodynamics and thermoeconomics. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2000) Function follows forum, forum to transprogramme, disprogram to form. http://www.msa.mmu.ac.uk/∼ bryn/report/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2003) Electric vehicle challenge: http://evchallenge.murdoch.edu.au/gears.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2004a) Quantified definitions in eco-efficiency. http://www.eco-efficiency-conf.org/content/home.definitions.shtml

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2004b) A manual for the preparers and users of eco-efficiency indicators. Version 1.1. UN, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU (1998) Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law. Ecological Economics 26:189-209

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, Nair I (1984) Thermodynamics and economics. Physics Today, November 1984:62-71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi BR (2000) A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineering. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24:1767-1773

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balocco C, Papeschi S, Grazzino G, Basosi R (2004) Using exergy to analyze the sustainability of an urban area. Ecological Economics 48:231-244

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bannock G, Baxter RE, Davis E (1998) The Penguin dictionary of economics. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Marchinetti N (1996) Ethanol production from biomass: analysis of process efficiency and sustainability. Biomass and Bioenergy 11(5):411-418

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Marchinetti N (1997) Emergy/exergy ratio as a measure of the level of organization of systems. Ecological Modelling 99:33-40

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S (1998) A definition of ’pollution’ based on thermodynamic goal functions. Ecological Modelling 113:163-166

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgärtner S, de Swaan Arons J (2003) Necessity and inefficiency in the generation of waste. A thermodynamic analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(2):113-123

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman T (2000) Martin Heidegger and environmental ethics. http://www2.hmc.edu/∼ tbeckman/personal/Heidart.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianciardi C, Donati A, Ulgiati S (1993) On the relationship between the economic process, the Carnot cycle and the entropy law. Ecological Economics 8:7-10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carnot L (1984) Mémoire présenté au Conseil de la guerre au sujet des places fortes qui doivent être démolies ou abandonnées; ou Examen de cette question: est-il avatageux au roi de France quìl y ait des places fortes sur les frontiéres de ses Ètats? In: Carnot L, Révolution et mathematique. Volume I. L’Herne, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnot S (1824) Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres a développer cette puissance. Bachelier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen GQ (2005) Exergy consumption of the earth. Ecological Modelling 184:363-380

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clapeyron E (1834) Mémoire sur la puissance motrice de la chaleur. Journal de l’Ècole Polytechnique, XXIIIe cahier

    Google Scholar 

  • Connely L, Koshland CP (1997) Two aspects of consumption: using an exergy-based measure of degradation to advance the theory and implementation of industrial ecology. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 19:199-217

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly L, Koshland CP (2001) Exergy and industrial ecology. Part 1: An exergy-based definition of consumption and a thermodynamic interpretation of ecosystem evolution. Exergy, an International Journal 1(3):146-165

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad M (1977) The thermodynamic meaning of ecological efficiency. The American Naturalist 111:99-106

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen RL, Hirs GG (2002) The value of exergetic life cycle assessment besides the LCA. Energy Conversion and Management 43:1417-1424

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel JJ, Rosen MA (2002) Exergetic environmental assessment of life cycle emissions for various automobiles and fuels. Exergy, an International Journal 2:283-294

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dewulf J, van Langenhove H (2002) Assessment of the sustainability of technology by means of a thermodynamically based life cycle analysis. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 9(4):267-273

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fath BD, Cabezas H (2004) Exergy and Fisher information as ecological indices. Ecological Modelling 174:25-35

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Östlund P (1997) Exergies of natural resources in life-cycle assessment and other applications. Energy 22(9):923-931

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1997) The poetry of thermodynamics. Energy, entropy/exergy and quality. Futures 29(9):791-810

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff P. le, Rivero R, de Oliveira S, Schwarzer B (1990) Energetic and economic optimization of industrial systems compared. In: Sieniutycz S, Salamon P (eds). Finite-time thermodynamics and thermoeconomics. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong M (2005) Exergy analysis of a pulp and paper mill. International Journal of Energy Research 29:79-93

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gong M, Wall G (2001) On exergy and sustainable development - part II: indicators and methods. Exergy, an International Journal 1(4):217-233

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gössling S, Peeters P, Ceron J-P, Dubois G, Patterson T, Richardson RB (2005) The eco-efficiency of tourism. Ecological Economics 54:417-434

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Groot SR de, Mazur P (1984) Non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hau JL, Bakshi BR (2004) Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. Environmental Science & Technology 38:3768-3777

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M (1977) The question concerning technology. In: Heidegger, M. The question concerning technology and other essays. Translated and with an introduction by William Lovitt. Harper Torchbooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hukkinen J (2001) Eco-efficiency as abandonment of nature. Ecological Economics 38:311-315

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hukkinen J (2003) From groundless universalism to grounded generalism: improving ecological economic indicators of human-environmental interaction. Ecological Economics 38:11-27

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE (1992) Exergy and ecology. Ecological Modelling 63:185-214

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE, Nielsen SN, Mejer H (1995) Emergy, environ, exergy and ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling 77:99-109

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman RL (1942) The trophic dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399-417

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1983) Systems ecology. An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT, Pinkerton RC (1955) Time’s speed regulator: the optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems, American Scientist 43:331-343

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1998) Eco-efficiency. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillet G, Baranzini A, Villet M, Collaud G (1989) Exergy, emergy, and entropy. In: Pillet, G. & T. Murota (Eds). Environmental economics. The analysis of a major interface. Leimgruber, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Rant Z (1956) Exergie, ein neues Wort für ‘‘technische Arbeitsfähigkeit’’. Forschung auf dem Gebiet des Ingenieurswesens; Ausgabe A 22, pp 36-37

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MA, Dincer I (2001) Exergy as the confluence of energy, environment and sustainable development. Exergy, an International Journal 1(1):3-13

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Krämer B, Wittlinger R, Zombik W, Schmidt I, Schrott W, Schmidt S (2002) Eco-efficiency Analysis by BASF: The Method. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(4):203-218

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1967) Economics. An introductory analysis. Seventh edition. McGraw-Hill Book company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Sturm A (1990) Ökologische Rationalität. Die Unternehmung 4:273-290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (1997) Economics of life cycle assessment: inefficiency of the present approach. Business Strategy and the Environment 6:1-8

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2000) Contemporary environmental accounting. Issues, concepts and practice. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenck R (2003) Production efficiency http://ingrimayne.saintjoe.edu/econ/Efficiency/ProductionEff.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing course. A global perspective on development and the environment. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger E (1994) What is life? The physical of the living cell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scienceman DM (1989) Energy and emergy. In: Pillet, G, Murota T (eds). Environmental economics. The analysis of a major interface. Leimgruber, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciubba E (2001) Beyond thermoeconomics? The concept of Extended Exergy Accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems. Exergy, an International Journal 1(2):68-84

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seager TP, Theis TL (2002a) A uniform definition and quantitative basis for industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production 10:225-235

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seager TP, Theis TL (2002b) Exergetic pollution potential: estimating the revocability of chemical pollution. Exergy, an International Journal 2:273-282

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silow EA, Oh I (2004) Aquatic ecosystem assessment using exergy. Ecological Indicators 4:189-198

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin LB (1960) Energy relationships at the population level. The American Naturalist 94:213-236

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C (2001) Environmental physics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Speigelman J (2003) Beyond the food web. Connections to a deeper industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(1):17-23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Szargut JT (2003) Anthropogenic and natural exergy lossess (exergy balance of the Earth’s surface and atmosphere). Energy 28:1047-1054

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ukidwe NU, Bakshi BR (2004) Thermodynamic accounting of ecosystem contribution to economic sectors with application to 1992 U.S. economy. Environmental Science & Technology 38:4810-4827

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wall G, Gong M (2001) On exergy and sustainable development - part I: conditions and concepts. Exergy, an International Journal 1(3):128-145

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD (2004a) Eco-efficiency. http://www.wbcsd.ch/includes/getTarget.asp?type=p&id=NzA&doOpen=1&ClickMenu=LeftMenu

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD (2004b) Eco-efficiency. http://www.wbcsd.org/templates /TemplateWBCSD1/layout.asp?type=p&MenuId=MzI4, 2004b.

    Google Scholar 

  • White ID, Mottershead DN, Harrison SJ (1992) Environmental systems. An introductory text. Second edition. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch DM (1971) Analytical welfare economics. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heijungs, R. (2007). From thermodynamic efficiency to eco-efficiency. In: Huppes, G., Ishikawa, M. (eds) Quantified Eco-Efficiency. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5399-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics