Skip to main content

Uncertainty characterization and settlement analyses: the importance of distribution types

  • Conference paper
III European Conference on Computational Mechanics

Abstract

In recent years, significant effort has been put into considering advanced probabilistic soil models that represent soil variability [see e.g., 1, 2]. In particular, the sensitivity of probability results to changes in the mean and variance of properties, and to changes in the structure of spatial correlation of soil properties has received wide attention [35].

We study the influence of using different types of statistical distributions to characterize the Young’s modulus of the soil for computation of settlements on spatially random soil. We use a linear elastic finite element model with a rigid footing founded on elastic soil. Poisson’s ratio of the soil is considered constant, and Young’s modulus is characterized using random fields with two limiting extreme values of their scales of fluctuation. We perform a number of simulations in which finite element program IRIS is used to compute the settlement of the foundation for each realization of the Young’s modulus random field. The mean Young’s modulus of the soil was considered constant in all cases, and standard deviations were varied among different simulations.

As expected, computed settlements are observed to be very similar when lognormal and gamma distributions are similar. Similarly, an “averaging” effect is observed for small scales of fluctuation; such “averaging” effect makes settlement results to be similar among different realizations of the random field. The election between lognormal or gamma distributions is significant, however, for high values of σ E . Differences between settlements computed with both distributions are particularly significant for large values of the scale of fluctuation. That is, our results suggest that, in some cases, the type of distribution considered for characterization of the random field of Young’s modulus can have a significant impact on computed settlement results. Such observation should be taken into account when performing simulations of random fields in the context of settlement analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. G. A. Fenton (1999). “Estimation for stochastic soil models.” Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(6), 470–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Rackwitz (2000). “Reviewing probabilistic soils modelling.” Computers and Geotechnics, 26(3-4), 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Griffiths and G. Fenton (2004). “Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 130(5), 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Fenton and D. Griffiths (2002). “Probabilistic foundation settlement on spatially random soil.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 128(5), 381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Griffiths and G. Fenton (1997). “Three-dimensional seepage through spatially random soil.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 123(2), 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jimenez-Rodriguez, R., Lacoma, L.M. (2006). Uncertainty characterization and settlement analyses: the importance of distribution types. In: Motasoares, C.A., et al. III European Conference on Computational Mechanics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5370-3_285

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5370-3_285

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4994-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5370-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics