Advertisement

The Comparison Of Mathematics With Narrative

  • R.S.D. Thomas
Chapter
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 5)

Abstract

Mathematical writing, chiefly of proofs, is compared with the telling of stories. Contrasts are also noted. The positive analogy is used to support the view of mathematics as being about relations rather than objects obviating a need for ontological commitment to mathematical objects. The negative analogy is used to deny some philosophers’ identification of mathematics with fiction.

Keywords

Narrative fiction history relations pretence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balaguer, Mark [2001]: ‘A theory of mathematical correctness and mathematical truth’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boodin, J. E. [1943]: ‘Fictions in Science and Philosophy I’ and ‘. . . II’, J. Phil. 40, 673–682 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J. R. [1999]: Philosophy of mathematics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, Leone [1999]: ‘The implications of a narrative approach to the learning of mathematics’, in Leone Burton, ed. Learning mathematics: From hierarchies to networks. London and Washington: Falmer Press, pp. 21–35.Google Scholar
  5. Cooke, Elizabeth F. [2003]: ‘Peirce, Fallibilism, and the Science of Mathematics’, Philos. Math. 11 (3), 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crimmins, Mark [1998], ‘Hesperus and Phosphorus: Sense, Pretense, and Reference’, Philos. Rev. 107, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eco, Umberto [1979]: The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Field, Hartry [1980]: Science without numbers: A defence of nominalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Field, Hartry [1989]: Realism, mathematics and modality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Field, Hartry [1990]: ‘Mathematics without truth (a reply to Maddy)’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71, 206–222.Google Scholar
  11. Isaacson, Daniel [1994]: ‘Mathematical intuition and objectivity’, in Alexander George, ed. Mathematics and mind. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 118–140.Google Scholar
  12. Körner, Stephan [1967]: ‘On the relevance of post-Gödelian mathematics to philosophy’, in I. Lakatos, ed. Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 118–132, with discussion by Gert H. Müller and Y. Bar-Hillel and reply, pp. 133–137.Google Scholar
  13. Paulos, John Allen [1998]: Once upon a number: The hidden mathematical logic of stories. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Putnam, Hilary [1971]: Philosophy of Logic. New York: Harper and Row. Reprinted in his [1975], pp. 323–357)Google Scholar
  15. Putnam, Hilary [1975]: Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Morton, Adam [1996]: ‘Mathematics as Language’ in A. Morton and S. P. Stich, eds. Benacerraf and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 213–227.Google Scholar
  17. Rav, Yehuda [1999]: ‘Why Do We Prove Theorems?’, Philos. Math. 7 (3), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rotman, Brian [1993]: Ad Infinitum: The Ghost in Turing’s Machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Thomas, R. S. D. [2000]: ‘Mathematics and Fiction I: Identification’, Logique et Analyse, 43, 301-340.Google Scholar
  20. Thomas, R. S. D. [2002]: ‘Mathematics and Fiction II: Analogy, Logique et Analyse, 45, 185-228.Google Scholar
  21. Thomas, R. S. D. [2002]: ‘Mathematics and Narrative’, The Mathematical Intelligencer 24, No. 3, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Turner, Mark [1996]: The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. van Fraassen, Bas [1975]: review of H. Putnam’s Philosophy of Logic. Canadian J. Phil. 4, 731–743.Google Scholar
  24. van Inwagen, Peter [1977]: ‘Creatures of fiction’, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 299–308.Google Scholar
  25. Walton, Kendall L. [1990]: Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. White, Hayden [1978]: Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Woods, John [2002]. Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict resolution in the abstract sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zalta, Ed [1983]: Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.S.D. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ManitobaCanada

Personalised recommendations