Twenty-five key evolutionary insights from the phylogeographic revolution in population genetics

  • John C. Avise


An overview is provided of 25 novel perspectives that the field of phylogeography has brought to scientific studies of population genetics and speciation. A unifying theme is that microevolu-tion can be described as an extended genealogical process played out in space and time, and reflecting the oft-idiosyncratic biological and environmental factors that have impinged on historical population demography. Most of the empirical and conceptual methods of phylogeo-graphy depart considerably from conventional equilibrium approaches, and they are helping to reorient and extend traditional population genetics in realistic directions that emphasize historical demography and genealogy.


phylogeography genealogy gene trees demography speciation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asmussen MA, Arnold J, Avise JC (1987) Definition and properties of disequilibrium statistics for associations between nuclear and cytoplasmic genotypes. Genetics 115, 755-768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC (1989a) Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology. Evolution 43, 1192-1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avise JC (1989b) A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 279-281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avise JC (1992) Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63, 62-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Avise JC, Ball RM Jr (1990) Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7, 45-67.Google Scholar
  7. Avise JC, Walker D (1998) Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 265, 457-463.Google Scholar
  8. Avise JC, Walker D} (1999) Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 992-995.Google Scholar
  9. Avise JC, Giblin-Davidson C, Laerm J, Patton JC, Lansman RA (1979) Mitochondrial DNA clones and matriarchal phylogeny within and among geographic populations of the pocket gopher, Geomys pinetis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA Google Scholar
  10. Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, Neigel JE, Reeb CA, Saunders NC (1987) Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 489-522.Google Scholar
  11. Avise JC, Ball RM Jr, Arnold J (1988) Current versus historical population sizes in vertebrate species with high gene flow: a comparison based on mitochondrial DNA lineages and inbreeding theory for neutral mutations. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5, 331-344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Avise JC, Walker D, Johns GC (1998) Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 265, 1707-1712.Google Scholar
  13. Birky CW Jr, Maruyama T, Fuerst PA (1983) An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts and some results. Genetics 103, 513-527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown WM, George, M Jr, Wilson AC (1979) Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76, 1967-1971.Google Scholar
  15. Hauswirth WW, Laipis PJ (1982) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in a maternal lineage of Holstein cows. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 79, 4686-4690.Google Scholar
  16. Hey J (1994) Bridging phylogenetics and population genetics with gene tree models. In: Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications (eds. Schierwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, DeSalle R), pp. 435-449. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
  17. Hudson RR (1990) Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7, 1-44.Google Scholar
  18. Hutchinson CA III, Newbold JE, Potter SS, Edgell MH (1974) Maternal inheritance of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Nature} 251, 536-538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maddison WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46, 523-536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melnick DJ, Hoelzer GA (1992) Differences in male and female macaque dispersal lead to contrasting distributions of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA variation. International Journal of Primatology 13, 379-393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moritz CC (1994) Defining ‘evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 373-375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neigel JE, Avise JC (1986) Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Evolutionary Processes and Theory (eds. Nevo, Karlin, S), pp. 515-534. Academic Press, New York,Google Scholar
  23. Tajima F (1983) Evolutionary relationships of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetical Research 123, 437-460.Google Scholar
  24. Tateno Y, Nei M, Tajima F (1982) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. Journal of Molecular Evolution 18, 387-404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson AC, Cann RL, Carr SM, George M, Gyllenstein UB, Helm-Bychovski KM, Higuchi RG, Palumbi SR, Prager EM, Sage RS, Stoneking, M (1985) Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 26, 375-400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Avise

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations