Abstract
The importance, scope, and goals of semiotics can be compared to the ones of physics. These represent two principal ways of approaching the world scientifically. Physics is a study of quantities, whereas semiotics is a study of diversity. Physics is about natural laws, while semiotics is about code processes. Semiotic models can describe features that are beyond the reach of physical models due to the more restricted methodological requirements of the latter. The “measuring devices” of semiotics are alive — which is a sine qua nonfor the presence of meanings. Thus, the two principal ways to scientifically approach living systems are biophysics and biosemiotics. Accordingly, semiotic (including biosemiotic) systems can be studied both physically (e.g., using statistical methods) and semiotically (e.g., focusing on the uniqueness of the system). The principle of code plurality as a generalization of the code duality principle is formulated.
Physical or natural-scientific methodology sets certain limits to the acceptable ways of acquiring knowledge. The more alive the object of study, the more restrictive are these limits. Therefore, there exists the space for another methodology – the semiotic methodology that can study the qualitative diversity and meaningfulness of the world of life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, Myrdene; Deely. John: Kranpen, Martin; Ransdell, Joseph; Sebeok, Thomas A.; Uexkiill, Thure von 1984. A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps towards a new paradign. Semiotica 52(1/2), 7–47.
Baer, Karl Ernst von 1864. Reden gehalten in wissenschaftlichen Versammlungen und kleinere Aufsötze vermischten Inhalts. Erster Theil. St. Petersburg: H.Schmitzdorff.
Barbieri, Marcello 2003. The Organic Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deacon, Terrence 1997. The Symbolic Species. London: Penguin.
Deely, John 2001. Four Ages of Understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Deely, John 2004. Semiotics and Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of umwelt. Sign Systems Studies 32(1/2): 11–34.
Deely, John 2005a. Basics of Semiotics. 4th ed. (Tartu Semiotics Library 4.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Deely, John 2005b. Thomas Albert Sebeok and Semiotics. Sofia: Southeast European Center for Semiotic Studies.
Eco, Umberto 1979. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Emmeche, Claus 2004. A-life, organism, and body: The semiotics of emergent levels. In: Bedeau, Mark; Husbands, Phil; Hutton, Tim; Kumar, Sanjev; Hideaki, Suzuki (eds.), Workshop and Tutorial Proceedings: Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (Alife IX). Boston, 117–124.
Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi; Stjernfelt, Frederik 2002. Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. (Tartu Semiotics Library 3.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Favareau, Donald 2006. The Evolutionary History of Biosemiotics. This volume, P. 1–67.
Goodwin, Brian C. 1972. Biology and meaning. In: Waddington, Conrad Hal (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology. Vol. 4: Essays. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 259–275.
Hoffmann, Roald 1995. The Same and Not the Same. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper 1996. Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper 1997. Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 9(2): 355–376.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Emmeche, Claus 1991. Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson, Myrdene; Merrell, Floyd (eds.), On Semiotic Modeling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 117–166.
Kawade, Yoshimi 1999. The two foci of biology: Matter and sign. Semiotica 127(1/4): 369–384.
Kotov, Kaie; Kull, Kalevi 2006. Semiosphere versus biosphere. In: Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, vol. 11: 194–198. Oxford: Elsevier.
Kull, Kalevi 1998. On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere. Semiotica 120(3/4): 299–310.
Kull, Kalevi 1999a. Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: A view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 385–414.
Kull, Kalevi 1999b. On the history of joining bio with semio: F. S. Rothschild and the biosemiotic rules. Sign Systems Studies 27: 128–138.
Kull, Kalevi 1999c. Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman. Semiotica 127(1/4): 115–131.
Kull, Kalevi 2001. Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica 134(1/4): 1–59.
Kull, Kalevi 2003. Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: Building biosemiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 10(1): 47–60.
Levich, Alexander P.; Lovyagin, S. M. 1977. Suschestvuet li ekologicheskij kod? In: Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie aspekty biologii. Petrozavodsk: Institut Biologii Karelskogo filiala, 71–74.
Lotman, Juri M. 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B.Tauris.
Lotman, Juri 1992. Kul’tura i vzryv [Culture and Explosion]. Moskva: Gnozis.
Lotman, Juri 2005 [1984]. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1): 215–239.
Lotman, Mihhail 2002. Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 30(1): 33–40.
Markos, Anton 2002. Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morris, Charles 1971 [1946]. Signs, Language, and behavior. New York: Braziller.
Nöth, Winfried 2001. Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature. Sign Systems Studies 29(1): 71–81.
Pattee, Howard H. 1972. Laws and constraints, symbols and languages. In: Waddington, Conrad Hal (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology. Vol. 4: Essays. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 248–258.
Perron, Paul; Sbrocchi, Leonard G.; Colilli, Paul; Danesi, Marcel (eds.) 2000. Semiotics as Bridge between the Humanities and the Sciences. New York: Legas.
Petrilli, Susan 1999. Charles Morris’s biosemiotics. Semiotica 127(1/4): 67–102.
Pirner, Hans-Jürgen 2002. The semiotics of “postmodern” physics. In: Ferrari, Massimo; Stamatescu, Ion-Olimpiu (eds.), Symbol and Physical Knowledge. Berlin: Springer, 211–229.
Posner, Roland 2001a: Semiotics: The Physics of the 21st century. Presidential Address at the 7th Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS). In: Schmitz, Walter; Froeschle, Ulrich (eds.), Sign Processes in Complex Systems. Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the IASS, Dresden, October 6–11, 1999. Dresden: WEB-Verlag, p. 40.
Rosen, Robert 1991. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosen, Robert 1999. Essays on Life Itself. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosen, Robert; Pattee, Howard H.; Somorjai, R. L. 1979. A symposium in theoretical biology. In: Buckley, Paul; Peat, F. David (eds.), A Question of Physics: Conversations in Physics and Biology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 84–123.
Rothschild, Friedrich S. 1962. Laws of symbolic mediation in the dynamics of self and personality. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 96: 774–784.
Rüting, Torsten 2004. History and significance of Jakob von Uexküll and of his institute in Hamburg. Sign Systems Studies 32(1/2): 35–72.
Schult, Joachim (ed.) 2004. Biosemiotik — praktische Anwendung und Konsequenzen für die Einzelwissenschaften. [Studien zur Theorie der Biologie 6.] Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.
Santaella, Lucia 1999. Peirce and biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 5–21.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 1972. Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.) 1977. How Animals Communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 1990. Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 2000a. Essays in Semiotics — I: Life Signs. New York: Legas.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 2000b. Semiotics as bridge between humanities and sciences. In: Perron, Paul; Sbrocchi, Leonard G.; Colilli, Paul; Danesi, Marcel (eds.), Semiotics as Bridge between the Humanities and the Sciences. New York: Legas, 76–100.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 2001. Biosemiotics. In: Cobley, Paul (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics. London: Routledge, 163–164.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 2002. La semiosfera come biosfera. Athanor 5: 11–18.
Sebeok, Thomas A.; Umiker-Sebeok, Jean (eds.) 1992. Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shintani, Laura 1999. Roman Jakobson and biology: ‘A system of systems’. Semiotica 127(1/4): 103–113.
Uexküll, Jakob von 1928 [1920]. Theoretische Biologie. 2te Aufl. Berlin: J.Springer.
Uexküll, Jakob von 1940. Bedeutungslehre. Leipzig: J.A.Barth.
Uexküll, Jakob von 1982 [1940]. The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82.
Uexküll, Thure von; Geigges, Werner; Herrmann, Jörg M. 1993. Endosemiosis. Semiotica 96(1/2): 5–51.
Weber, Andreas 2003. Natur als Bedeutung: Versuch einer semiotischen Theorie des Lebendigen. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Witzany, Günther 2006. The Logos of the Bios 1: Contributions to the Foundation of a Three-Leveled Biosemiotics. Tartu: UMWEB.
Yates, F. Eugene 1985. Semiotics as a bridge between information (biology) and dynamics (physics). Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 5: 347–360.
Yates, F. Eugene; Beaugrande, Robert de 1990. Physics and semiotics. In: Koch, Walter A. (ed.), Semiotics and the Sciences. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 318–351.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kull, K. (2008). Biosemiotics and Biophysics — The Fundamental Approaches to the Study of Life. In: Barbieri, M. (eds) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4813-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4814-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)