Skip to main content

Biosemiotics and Biophysics — The Fundamental Approaches to the Study of Life

  • Chapter
Introduction to Biosemiotics

Abstract

The importance, scope, and goals of semiotics can be compared to the ones of physics. These represent two principal ways of approaching the world scientifically. Physics is a study of quantities, whereas semiotics is a study of diversity. Physics is about natural laws, while semiotics is about code processes. Semiotic models can describe features that are beyond the reach of physical models due to the more restricted methodological requirements of the latter. The “measuring devices” of semiotics are alive — which is a sine qua nonfor the presence of meanings. Thus, the two principal ways to scientifically approach living systems are biophysics and biosemiotics. Accordingly, semiotic (including biosemiotic) systems can be studied both physically (e.g., using statistical methods) and semiotically (e.g., focusing on the uniqueness of the system). The principle of code plurality as a generalization of the code duality principle is formulated.

Physical or natural-scientific methodology sets certain limits to the acceptable ways of acquiring knowledge. The more alive the object of study, the more restrictive are these limits. Therefore, there exists the space for another methodology – the semiotic methodology that can study the qualitative diversity and meaningfulness of the world of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Myrdene; Deely. John: Kranpen, Martin; Ransdell, Joseph; Sebeok, Thomas A.; Uexkiill, Thure von 1984. A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps towards a new paradign. Semiotica 52(1/2), 7–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Karl Ernst von 1864. Reden gehalten in wissenschaftlichen Versammlungen und kleinere Aufsötze vermischten Inhalts. Erster Theil. St. Petersburg: H.Schmitzdorff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello 2003. The Organic Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, Terrence 1997. The Symbolic Species. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John 2001. Four Ages of Understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John 2004. Semiotics and Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of umwelt. Sign Systems Studies 32(1/2): 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John 2005a. Basics of Semiotics. 4th ed. (Tartu Semiotics Library 4.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John 2005b. Thomas Albert Sebeok and Semiotics. Sofia: Southeast European Center for Semiotic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto 1979. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus 2004. A-life, organism, and body: The semiotics of emergent levels. In: Bedeau, Mark; Husbands, Phil; Hutton, Tim; Kumar, Sanjev; Hideaki, Suzuki (eds.), Workshop and Tutorial Proceedings: Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (Alife IX). Boston, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi; Stjernfelt, Frederik 2002. Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. (Tartu Semiotics Library 3.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, Donald 2006. The Evolutionary History of Biosemiotics. This volume, P. 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Brian C. 1972. Biology and meaning. In: Waddington, Conrad Hal (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology. Vol. 4: Essays. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Roald 1995. The Same and Not the Same. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper 1996. Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper 1997. Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 9(2): 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Emmeche, Claus 1991. Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson, Myrdene; Merrell, Floyd (eds.), On Semiotic Modeling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 117–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawade, Yoshimi 1999. The two foci of biology: Matter and sign. Semiotica 127(1/4): 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, Kaie; Kull, Kalevi 2006. Semiosphere versus biosphere. In: Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, vol. 11: 194–198. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi 1998. On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere. Semiotica 120(3/4): 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi 1999a. Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: A view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 385–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi 1999b. On the history of joining bio with semio: F. S. Rothschild and the biosemiotic rules. Sign Systems Studies 27: 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi 1999c. Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman. Semiotica 127(1/4): 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi 2001. Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica 134(1/4): 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi 2003. Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: Building biosemiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 10(1): 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levich, Alexander P.; Lovyagin, S. M. 1977. Suschestvuet li ekologicheskij kod? In: Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie aspekty biologii. Petrozavodsk: Institut Biologii Karelskogo filiala, 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Juri M. 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B.Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Juri 1992. Kul’tura i vzryv [Culture and Explosion]. Moskva: Gnozis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Juri 2005 [1984]. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1): 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Mihhail 2002. Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 30(1): 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markos, Anton 2002. Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Charles 1971 [1946]. Signs, Language, and behavior. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, Winfried 2001. Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature. Sign Systems Studies 29(1): 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard H. 1972. Laws and constraints, symbols and languages. In: Waddington, Conrad Hal (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology. Vol. 4: Essays. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron, Paul; Sbrocchi, Leonard G.; Colilli, Paul; Danesi, Marcel (eds.) 2000. Semiotics as Bridge between the Humanities and the Sciences. New York: Legas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli, Susan 1999. Charles Morris’s biosemiotics. Semiotica 127(1/4): 67–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirner, Hans-Jürgen 2002. The semiotics of “postmodern” physics. In: Ferrari, Massimo; Stamatescu, Ion-Olimpiu (eds.), Symbol and Physical Knowledge. Berlin: Springer, 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Roland 2001a: Semiotics: The Physics of the 21st century. Presidential Address at the 7th Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS). In: Schmitz, Walter; Froeschle, Ulrich (eds.), Sign Processes in Complex Systems. Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the IASS, Dresden, October 6–11, 1999. Dresden: WEB-Verlag, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert 1991. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert 1999. Essays on Life Itself. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert; Pattee, Howard H.; Somorjai, R. L. 1979. A symposium in theoretical biology. In: Buckley, Paul; Peat, F. David (eds.), A Question of Physics: Conversations in Physics and Biology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 84–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Friedrich S. 1962. Laws of symbolic mediation in the dynamics of self and personality. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 96: 774–784.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rüting, Torsten 2004. History and significance of Jakob von Uexküll and of his institute in Hamburg. Sign Systems Studies 32(1/2): 35–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schult, Joachim (ed.) 2004. Biosemiotik — praktische Anwendung und Konsequenzen für die Einzelwissenschaften. [Studien zur Theorie der Biologie 6.] Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santaella, Lucia 1999. Peirce and biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1972. Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.) 1977. How Animals Communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1990. Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 2000a. Essays in Semiotics — I: Life Signs. New York: Legas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 2000b. Semiotics as bridge between humanities and sciences. In: Perron, Paul; Sbrocchi, Leonard G.; Colilli, Paul; Danesi, Marcel (eds.), Semiotics as Bridge between the Humanities and the Sciences. New York: Legas, 76–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 2001. Biosemiotics. In: Cobley, Paul (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics. London: Routledge, 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 2002. La semiosfera come biosfera. Athanor 5: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A.; Umiker-Sebeok, Jean (eds.) 1992. Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shintani, Laura 1999. Roman Jakobson and biology: ‘A system of systems’. Semiotica 127(1/4): 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, Jakob von 1928 [1920]. Theoretische Biologie. 2te Aufl. Berlin: J.Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, Jakob von 1940. Bedeutungslehre. Leipzig: J.A.Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, Jakob von 1982 [1940]. The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, Thure von; Geigges, Werner; Herrmann, Jörg M. 1993. Endosemiosis. Semiotica 96(1/2): 5–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Andreas 2003. Natur als Bedeutung: Versuch einer semiotischen Theorie des Lebendigen. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzany, Günther 2006. The Logos of the Bios 1: Contributions to the Foundation of a Three-Leveled Biosemiotics. Tartu: UMWEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. Eugene 1985. Semiotics as a bridge between information (biology) and dynamics (physics). Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 5: 347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. Eugene; Beaugrande, Robert de 1990. Physics and semiotics. In: Koch, Walter A. (ed.), Semiotics and the Sciences. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 318–351.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kull, K. (2008). Biosemiotics and Biophysics — The Fundamental Approaches to the Study of Life. In: Barbieri, M. (eds) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics