Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Evolutionary History of Biosemiotics

  • Chapter
Book cover Introduction to Biosemiotics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Anderson, Myrdene. (1990). “Biology and semiotics”. in Semiotics in the Individual Sciences. W.A. Koch (ed.), 254–281. Bochum: Universitötsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Myrdene; Deely, John; Krampen, Martin; Ransdell, Joseph; Sebeok, Thomas A. and Thure von Uexküll (1984). “A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm”, Semiotica 52–1/2, 7–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. De Anima. (330 BC /1941) Translator: J. A. Smith. In McKeon, Richard. The Basic Works of Aristotle, New York, Basic Books, pp. 533–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. De Interpretatione. (330 BC /1941) Translator: E. M. Edghill. In McKeon, Richard (1941). The Basic Works of Aristotle, New York, Basic Books, pp. 38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. De Sensu et Sensibilius. (c350 /2004). Translator: J.I. Beare. Available online as e-book at: http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/sense/

    Google Scholar 

  • Artmann, Stefan. (2005). “Biosemiotics as a structural science: Between the forms of life and the life of forms”. Journal of Biosemiotics 1, pp. 229–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artmann, Stefan. ( forthcoming). “Computing codes versus interpreting life: Two alternative ways of synthesizing biological knowledge through semiotics”. Journal of Biosemiotics (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine of Hippo: (387 /1975) De dialectica, ed. Jan Pinborg, translation with introd. and notes by B. Darrel Jackson, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine of Hippo (389 /1963): De Doctrina Christiana. in Sancti Augustini Opera, ed. W. M. Green, CSEL 80, Vienna. Cited in Meir-Oeser (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas (1252 /1965). “De Ente et Essentia (On Being and Essence)”. In Bobik, Joseph (Trans.) Aquinas on Being and Essence: A Translation and Interpretaion. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. (1620 /1863). Novum Organum. In James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath in Francis Bacon’s Works (Vol. VIII) Boston: Taggard and Thompson. Available Online at: http://www.constitution.org/bacon/nov_org.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Eugen. (1987). “Thomas A. Sebeok’s Doctrine of Signs”. In Krampen, Martin (Ed). Classics of Semiotics. New York, Plenum Press, pp.181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello (1981). “The ribotype theory of the origin of life”. Journal of Theoretical Biology 91: 545–601.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. (1985). The Semantic Theory of Evolution. New York: Harwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. (2002). “Has biosemiotics come of age?” Semiotica, 139(1/4), 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. (2003). The Organic Codes: An Introduction To Semantic Biology. Cambridge, UK.; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri Marcello. (2003a). “Biology with information and meaning_” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 25, 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri Marcello. (2005). “Life is artifact-making”. Journal of Biosemiotics 1, 107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardini, Thierry. (2001) Bootstrapping: Douglas Engelbart, Coevolution, and the Origins of Personal Computing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Gregory. (1973). Steps To An Ecology Of Mind; Collected Essays In Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, And Epistemology. San Francisco,: Chandler Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentele, Günter. (1984). Zeichen und Entwicklung: Vorüberlegungen zu einer genetischen Semiotik. Tübingen: G.Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Jeff (2001) Obituary: Thomas A. Sebeok November 9, 1920 – December 21, 2001. Available at the website for the International Association for Semiotic Studies page: http://www.uniak. ac.at/culture/withalm/semiotics/AIS/sem-people/sebeok/TASebeok-obit.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, Mark. H. (1999). “Representation In Natural and Artificial Agents”. E. Taborsky (Ed.) Semiosis. Evolution. Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. (15–25). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, Mark. H. (2003). “The Biological Emergence of Representation”. In T. Brown, L. Smith (Ed.) Emergence and Reduction: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium of the Jean Piaget Society. (105–131). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böll, Mette (2002). The evolution of empathy in social systems. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 2, the University of Tartu, Estonia. June 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent, Joseph. (1993).Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, Søren ed. (1995). “Cyber-semiotics: On autopoesis, code-duality and sign games in biosemiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 3 (1), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, Søren ed. (1998). “Cyber-semiotics: A transdisciplinary framework for information studies”. Biosystems 46, pp. 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, Søren ed. (2001). “Cybersemiotics and Umweltlehre”. Semiotica 134 (1/4), pp. 779–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, Søren ed. (2003), “Thomas Sebeok and the Biosemiotic Legacy”., Special Memorial Issue of Cybernetics and Human Knowing 10.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Journal. (2004) “Obituary: Thure von Uexküll_” (October 30) 329:1047. Available at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7473/1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Rodney. (1999). Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, Luis Emilio. (1997). “Cultura, determinismo económico y la confusión del mapa con el territorio”. Venezuela Analitica Revista Electrónica Bilingüe 13. Available at: http://www.analitica.com/archivo/vam1997.03/lit2.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, Luis Emilio. (2001). “Biosemiotics and ecological monitoring”. Sign System Studies 29(1), 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbano, Hernán A. (2005). Determinism, Indeterminism and Semiotic Election. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. (1974). “Evolutionary Epistemology”. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.) The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. pp. 412–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, Peter (2001). “Symbols and dynamics in the brain”. Biosystems. Vol 60, pp. 59–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David (1995). “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3):200–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Han-liang. (2002). Is Language a Primary Modeling System?–On Juri Lotman’s Semiosphere. Paper presented at the International Conference on Cultural Semiotics: Cultural Mechanisms, Boundaries, Identities University of Tartu, Estonia, February 26 – March 2, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Han-liang. (2005) “Biosemiotics: Nature in Culture or Culture in Nature?” Chung Wai Literary Monthly 34 (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebanov, Sergei V. (1994). “Man as participant to natural creation: Enlogue and ideas of hermeneutics in biology”. Rivista di Biologia 87(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chekhov, Anton. (1904). Teatr I iskusstvo. No. 28, 11 July, p. 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, Juipi Angelina (2003): Diagramming as a Convergence of C. S. Peirce, Jakob von Uexküll, and E. Gombrich. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 3, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. July 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen Peder Voetmann (2000) Macro and Micro-Levels in Physics in Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter. Peter Bøgh Andersen, Claus Emmeche, Niels Ole Finnemann and Peder Voetmann Christiansen (Eds). Århus: Aarhus University Press. pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul. (1984) “Eliminative Materialism” in Matter and Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward A Unified Science Of The Mind-Brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia. S. (2002). Brain-Wise: Studies In Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, And World Together Again. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colapietro, Vincent. (1989). Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity State. Univ of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colapietro, Vincent and Thomas Olshewsky. (1996). (Eds.) Peirce’s Doctrine of Signs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, John (1999) “The Dynamical Basis of Information and the Origins of Semiosis”., in Edwina Taborsky (ed) Semiosis. Evolution. Energy Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen: Shaker Verlag:111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, Francis. (1958). “On Protein Synthesis”. Symposium for Experimental Biology XII, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, Francis. (1988). What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery, New York, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1977). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvrčková, Fatima (2002). “The Darwinian purpose enters the post-genomic era: A case study”. In Havel, Ivan and Markoš, Anton (Eds.) Is There a Purpose in Nature? How to Navigate Between the Scylla of Mechanism and the Charybdis of Teleology. Czech Republic: Vesmir. pp. 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvrčková, Fatima and Markoš, Anton. (2005). “Beyond bioinformatics: Can similarity be measured in the digital world?” Journal of Biosemiotics 1, pp. 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, Antionio. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, And The Human Brain. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, Marcel. (1998). (Ed.) The Body in the Sign: Thomas A. Sebeok and Semiotics. Ottawa: Legas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, Marcel. (2002). “Thomas A. Sebeok (1920–2001) Remembered_” SIGN Journal, Vol 3.1, Available at: http://vicu.utoronto.ca/courses/semiotics/SIGN_Danesi_TAS.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, Marcel. (2000). “The biosemiotic paradigm of Thomas A. Sebeok”. In Tarasti, E. Commentationes in Honorem Thomas A. Sebeok Octogenarii. Imatra:ISI. pp. 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, Terrence. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution Of Language And The Brain. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, Terrence. W. (2003). “The heirarchic logic of emergence: Untangling the interdependence of evolution and self-organization”. In B. H. W. a. D. J. Depew (Ed.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered (pp. 273–308). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. (1995). Thomas A. Sebeok: Bibliography 1942–1995. Bloomington: Eurolingua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. (2001). Four Ages Of Understanding: The First Postmodern Survey Of Philosophy From Ancient Times To The Turn Of The Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. (2004) “Thomas Albert Sebeok, “Biologist Manqué”., International Association for Semiotic Studies 2004 World Congress, Lyon. (Sebeok Memorial Essay) available at: http://carbon.cudenver.edu/∼ mryder/itc/sebeok.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John N., Williams, B. and Kruse, F.E. (eds.) (1986). Frontiers in Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deledalle, Gérard. (2000) Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denizhan, Yağmur and Karatay, Vefa. (2002). Evolution of the “window”. Sign System Studies 30(1), pp.259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, David. (1996). Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. (1637 /1973). “Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason”. in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, translated by E. Haldane and G. Ross, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. (1641 /1973). “Meditations on First Philosophy”. InThe PhilosophicalWorksof Descartes, translated by E. Haldane and G. Ross, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 131–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, Assen I. (2004). Intelligence: Not Seeking Algorithm, But Meaning. Faber: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, Merlin. (1991). Origin of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Gerald. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On The Matter Of The Mind. New York, N.Y.: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Gerald & Tononi, Guilio. (2000). A Universe Of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser, Walter M. (1998). Reflections on a Theory of Organisms. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (1991). “A Semiotical Reflection on Biology, Living Signs and Artificial Life”. Biology & Philosophy, 6(3), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (1994). The Garden In The Machine: The Emerging Science Of Artificial Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (1998). “Defining life as a semiotic phenomenon”. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 5(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C. (1999). The biosemiotics of emergent properties in a pluralist ontology. In E. Taborsky (Ed.), Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (2000a). “Closure, Semiosis, Autopoiesis, and Autocatalysis – Closure, Function,

    Google Scholar 

  • Emergence, Semiosis, and Life: The Same Idea? Reflections on the Concrete and the Abstract in Theoretical Biology”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (2000b). “Transdisciplinarity, theory-zapping and the growth of knowledge”. Semiotica, 131(3/4), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (2001). “Does a robot have an Umwelt? Reflections on the qualitative biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll”. Semiotica 134 (1/4): 653–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. (2002). “Taking the semiotic turn, or how significant philosophy of biology should be done”. Sats, The Nordic Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus and Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1991). “From language to nature: the semiotic metaphor in biology”. Semiotica 84(1/2), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi and Stjernfelt, Frederik (2002). Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. Tartu: Tartu University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria, Marcella (2005). RNAs as code makers: A biosemiotic view of RNAi and cell immunity. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, Almo (2004): Eco-field versus habitat: Shifting a paradigm in developing a cognitive ecology. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 4, Charles University, Prague. June 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, Donald (2001). Beyond self and other: The neurosemiotic emergence of intersubjectivity. Sign Systems Studies, 30 (1), pp. 57–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, Donald (2001a). “Phenomenal Epiphenomena: Deconstructing the Fallacy Fallacy”. Invited seminar presentation, First International Gatherings in Biosemiotics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. May 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, Donald. (2002). Constructing representema: On the neurosemiotics of self and vision. Semiotics, Evolution, Energy and Development Journal 2 (4), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florkin, Marcel (1974). “Concepts of molecular biosemiotics and of molecular evolution”. in Comprehensive Biochemistry 29A, 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Walter. J. (2000). Neurodynamics: An exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics. London; New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürlinger, Anton. (1998). “Locomotion and Cognition: From fish to hominids”. Proceedings of the 26th Goettingen Neurobiology Conf. 1998 Vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, Joaquin. M. (2003). Cortex And Mind: Unifying Cognition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, Paul.E. (2001). “Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory”. Philosophy of Science, 68, 394–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, László (2003): A new model for biology? Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 3, the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. July 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries-Jones, Peter. (1995). A Recursive Vision: Ecological Understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, Ivan and Markoš, Anton (2002). Is There a Purpose in Nature? How to Navigate between the Scylla of Mechanism and the Charybdis of Teleology Czech Republic: Vesmir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1984). Naturen I Hovedet. Om Biologisk Videnskab. København: Rosinante.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1988). Bioinformation techniques and the view of nature. In Thill, G., and Kemp, P. (eds). The Triumph of Biotechnologies: The Domestication of the human Animal. Namur: Presse Universitaires de Namur. pp. 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1992). “Some semiotic aspects of the psycho-physical relation: The endoexosemiotic boundary”. In T. S. a. J. U. Sebeok (Ed.), Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web (pp. 101–124). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1996). Signs Of Meaning In The Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1998). “Semiosis and Biohistory: A Reply”. in Semiotics in the Biosphere: Reviews and Rejoinder. Special issue of Semiotica Vol. 120. no. 3/4, pp. 455–482, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (2000a). “The Biology of Signification”. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 43(2), 252–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (2000b). “Life and reference”. Bio systems, 60(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (2001). “Seeing virtuality in nature”. Semiotica, 134(1–4), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (2002). “Code Duality Revisted”. Semiotics, Evolution, Energy and Devlopment Journal Vol 2 (1), pp. 98–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper and Emmeche, Claus (1991). “Code-duality and the semiotics of nature”. On Semiotic Modeling, Myrdene Anderson and Floyd Merrell (eds.), 117–166. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofkirchner, Wolfgang (2002) “The Status of Biosemiotics”. Semiosis, Energy, Evolution And Development Journal 3, pp. 4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Douglas. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Johannes and Schmid-Tannwald, Ingolf. (2005). Epigenetic mechanisms following mammalian fertilization reveal basic principles of constructivist epistemology. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igamberdiev, Abir. (1999). “Foundations of metabolic organization: Coherence as a basis of computational properties in metabolic networks”. BioSystems 50(1): 1–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jämsä, Tuomo (2005). Language and Nature. Magisterial Lecture Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Sungchul (2002). “Microsemiotics of DNA”. Semiotica 138 (1/4):15-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, Eric; Schwartz, James and Jessell, Thomas. (2002). Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatay, Vefa and Denizhan, Yagmur. (1999). “The non-decreasing character of complexity: A biological approach”. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems. Volume 5. Liège: Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart. (1995). At Home In The Universe: The Search For Laws Of Self-Organization And Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart. (2000). Investigations. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilstrup, Mogens. (1997). “Biokemi og semiotik: Molekylær biosemiotik”. In: Anvendt Semiotik, pp. 97–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleisner, Karel (2004): GENES – MEMES – SEMES. Towards the new concept of mimicry. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 4, Charles University, Prague. June 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, Kaie. (2002)”.Semiosphere: A chemistry of being”. Sign Systems Studies, 30 (1), pp. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, Martin (1981). “Phytosemiotics”. Semiotica, 36.3/4, 187–209; reprinted Deely, Williams and Kruse. 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. (1994). “On Juri Lotman”. Publications of the Modern Language Association 109 (3), pp. 375–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (1998). “Organism as a self-reading text: anticipation and semiosis”. International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems 1, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K. 1998. “On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere”. Semiotica 120(3/4), 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi (1999). “Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: a view from biology”. Semiotica 127(1/4), 385–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi (1999a). “On the history of joining bio with semio: F.S.Rothschild and the biosemiotic rules”. Sign Systems Studies 27, 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi (1999b). “Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman”. Semiotica 127(1/4): 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi (1999c). “A Teleology of the Estonian Research Tradition” talk given for the Baltic and Finnish Studies Association at Indiana University, November 9, 1999. Summary here: http://www.iub.edu/∼ bafsa/articles.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (2000a). “An introduction to phytosemiotics: Semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems”. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 326–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (2000b). “Organisms can be proud to have been their own designers”. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 7(1), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (2000c). “Part V Closure, Information, and Thermodynamics – Active Motion, Communicative

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggregations, and the Spatial Closure of Umwelt”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (2001). “Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction”. Semiotica 134(1/4): 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (2001). “Living forms are communicative structures, based on the organic codes”. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 8(3): 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi (2003). “Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: Building biosemiotics”. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 10(1): 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi. (2005). “A brief history of biosemiotics”. Journal of Biosemiotics Vol 1 pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küppers, Bernd-Olaf. (2000). Information and the Origin of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, Kari. (2001): Jacob von Uexkull and the origins of cybernetics. Semiotica 134 (1–4): 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society.. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestel, Dominique. (2002). “Human/animal communications, language and evolution”. Sign Systems Studies, 30(1), 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard. (1992). “The Dream of the Human Genome”. New York Review of Books, May 28, pp. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llinás, Rodolfo. R. (2001). I Of The Vortex: From Neurons To Self (1st ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Juri. (1984 /2005). “On the Semiosphere”. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Edward. (1963). “Deterministic nonperiodic flow”. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences. Vol.20 : 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luure, Andreas. (2002). “Understanding life: Trans-semiotic analogies”. Sign Systems Studies, 30 (1), pp. 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alisdair C. (1974 /1980). “Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative, and the philosophy of science”. In G. Gutting (Ed.), Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. (pp. 54–74). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maran, Timo (2003). “Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication”. Sign Systems Studies 31.1, pp. 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, Lynn, & Sagan, D. (1987). Microcosmos: Four Billion Years Of Evolution From Our Microbial Ancestors. Boston: Allen &Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, Anton. (2002a). “Evolution, purpose, teleology”. In Havel, Ivan and Markoš, Anton (Eds.) Is There a Purpose in Nature? How to Navigate Between the Scylla of Mechanism and the Charybdis of Teleology. Czech Republic: Vesmir. pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, Anton. (2002b). “Purpose and biology”. In Havel, Ivan and Markoš, Anton (Eds.) Is There a Purpose in Nature? How to Navigate Between the Scylla of Mechanism and the Charybdis of Teleology. Czech Republic: Vesmir. pp. 42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, Anton. (2002c). Readers Of The Book Of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, Dario (2005). “A whale of a sonata – Zoomusicology and the question of musical structures”. Semiosis, Energy, Evolution And Development Journal 2005 (1), p. 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuno, Kochiro & Swenson, R. (1999). “Thermodynamics in the Present Progressive Mode and its Role in the Context of the Origin of Life” BioSystems 51, 53–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, Humberto & Varela, Francisco ([1st edition 1973] 1980). “Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living”. Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 42. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord Adams, Marilyn. (1987). William Ockham. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, Colin. (1999). The Mysterious Flame: Conscious Minds in a Material World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Oeser, Stephan (2003), “Medieval Semiotics”., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2003 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives /win2003/entries/semiotics-medieval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, Floyd (1996). Signs Grow: Semiosis and Life Processes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Stephen A. and John P. Harley. (1994) Zoology. 2nd Ed. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Marvin. (1988). Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Toshiyuki (2005). Managing uncertainty of events by semiosis in living systems. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, William. (1323 /1991). Quodlibetal Questions, Alfred J. Freddoso and Francis. E. Kelley, trans., 2 vols., Yale Library of Medieval Philosophy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Yair (2003) Processes and Boundaries of the Mind: Extending the Limit Line. New York: Kulwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, Susan (1985). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, Stephen (2002) - Introduction to biorhetorics: applied rhetoric in the life sciences. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 2, the University of Tartu, Estonia. June 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmentier, R. J. (1994). Signs In Society: Studies In Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard. (1965). Experimental Approaches to the Origin of Life Problem. In F.F. Nord (ed.) Advances in Enzymology, Vol. 27. New York: Wiley. pp. 381–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard (1969). “The physical basis of coding and reliability in biological evolution”. in Towards a Theoretical Biology 1, C. H. Waddington, ed. Edinburgh Univ. Press, pp. 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard (1972). “Laws and constraints, symbols and languages”. in Towards a Theoretical Biology 4, C. H. Waddington, ed., Edinburgh Univ. Press, pp. 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard. (1977). “Dynamic and Linguistic Modes of Complex Systems”. International Journal for General Systems. 3: 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard. (1982). “The need for complementarity in models of cognitive behavior”. In W. Weimer and D. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic process, Vol 2 (pp. 21–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard. (1982a). “Cell psychology: An evolutionary approach to the symbol-matter problem”. Cognition and Brain Theory 5(4), 325–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard. (1988). “Simulations, realizations, and theories of life”. In C. Langton (Ed.), Artificial Life (pp. 63–77). Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard (2001). “The Physics of Symbols: Bridging the Epistemic Cut”. in BioSystems 60, 5–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, Howard (2005). “The physics and metaphysics of biosemiotics”. Journal of Biosemiotics 1, 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles. S. (1931–1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1–6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 7–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli, Susan, and Ponzio, Augusto (2001). Thomas Sebeok and the Signs of Life. Great Britain: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzio, Augusto. (1990). Man as a Sign: Essays on the Philosophy of Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poinsot, John (1632 /1985). Tractatus de Signis. With English translation by John Deely. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya. (1969), Structure, Dissipation and Life. Theoretical Physics and Biology, Versailles, 1967. North-Holland Publ. Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya, & Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out Of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue With Nature. Toronto; New York, N.Y.: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, João, Emmeche, Claus and El-Hani, Charbel Niño (2005). “Information and Semiosis in Living Systems: A Semiotic Approach”. Semiosis, Energy, Evolution And Development Journal (1), p. 60–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reybrouck, Mark (2005). The musical code between nature and nurture: Biosemiotic and ecological claims. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, Sidarta, Queiroz, João, and Ivan de Araùjo (2003): The emergence of referential symbolic process in non-human primates communication: A zoosemiotic analysis based on the Peircean extended theory of sign. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 3, the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. July 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert E. Ulanowicz (1986) Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. San Jose, CA: Excel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, Luis M. (2001). “Evolution with Material Symbol Systems”. Biosystems. Vol. 60, pp. 95–121. LAUR 00–1604.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roepstorff, Andreas. (2004) “Cellular Neurosemiotics: Outline of an interpretive framework”. In Joachim Schult (ed.) Studien zur Theorie der Biologie, Vol. 6: Biosemiotik - Praktische Anwendung und Konsequenzen für die Einzeldisziplinen. VWB - Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert (1991). Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Friedrich S. (1962). “Laws of symbolic mediation in the dynamics of self and personality”. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 96: 774–784.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rüting, Torsten. (2004) Jakob von Uexküll: Theoretical Biology, Biocybernetics and Biosemiotics. Available at: www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/rueting/UexECMTB.doc. Rüting, Torsten (2003): Uexküll’s “Institut für Umweltforschung” - Biosemiotics in action? Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 3, the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. July 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, Stanley N. (1993). Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, Stanley N. (2006). “Purpose in Nature”. Available online at: http://www.nbi.dk/∼ natphil/ salthe/Purpose_In_Nature.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savan, David (1976). Peirce’s Semiotic. Toronto: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1963). “Communication among social bees; porpoises and sonar; man and dolphin”. Language 39: 448–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1969). “Semiotics and ethology”. In: Approaches to Animal Communication, Thomas A. Sebeok and Alexandra Ramsay (eds.), 200–231. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A (1976). Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Lisse, Netherlands: The Peter de Ridder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1977). “Ecumenicalism in semiotics”. in A Perfusion of Signs, Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), 180–206. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A., ed., (1977). How Animals Communicate (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1977). “Neglected figures in the history of semiotic inquiry: Jakob von Uexkull”. in The Sign and Its Masters (pp. 187–207). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1980). Speaking of Apes: A Critical Anthology of Two-Way Communication with Man. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas. A. (1986). Encyclopedic Dictionary Of Semiotics. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1986). I Think I Am A Verb: More Contributions To The Doctrine Of Signs. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1988). ‘Animal’ in biological and semiotic perspective. In T. Ingold (Ed.), What is an Animal? (pp. 63–76). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1990) Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1990a). “Sign science and life science”. In J. Deely (Ed.), Semiotics 1990 (pp. 243 – 252). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1995). Into the rose-garden. In J. Deely (Ed.) Thomas A. Sebeok: Bibliography 1942–1995 (pp.116–125). Bloomington: Eurolingua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1998). “The Estonian connection”. Sign Systems Studies 26, 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (1999). “Biosemiotica I”. ed. with “Biosemiotica II”. guest-ed. Jesper Hoffmeyer and Claus Emmeche, Special Issue Semiotica 127-1/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (2001). “Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation, and prospects”. Semiotica, 134(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (2001a) The Swiss Pioneer: In Nonverbal Communication Studies, Heini Hediger (1908–1992). Ottawa: Legas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. and Umiker-Sebeok, Jean, (1980). Speaking of Apes: A Critical Anthology of Two-Way Communication with Man. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. and Rosenthal, Robert, eds., (1981). The Clever Hans Phenomenon: Communication with Horses, Whales, Apes, and People. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A and Umiker-Sebeok, Jan. (eds.) (1992). Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sercarz, Eli E., Celada, Franco, Mitchison, N. Avrion and Tada, Tomio (eds.) (1988). The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude and Weaver, Warren. (1949): The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, Amanda J.C. (1999) Combining Artificial Neural Nets: Ensemble and Modular Multi-Net Systems. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, Noel. E. (2002), “Biologically Inspired Robotics”. In M.Arbib (Ed), Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, Aleksei. (1992). “Biosemiotics: A functional-evolutionary approach to the analysis of the sense of information”. in Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991, T.A.Sebeok and J.Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), 345–373. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, Aleksei. (2002). “Pragmatics and biosemiotics”. Sign System Studies 30 (1), pp. 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibinski, Adam. (2004). “Metalogy: A Commentary on Mind, Recursion and Topological Inference”. Semiosis, Energy, Evolution And Development Journal 2004 (1), p. 70–90:

    Google Scholar 

  • SLIS Press News (2002) Thomas A. Sebeok, Senior Fellow at SLIS, Passes On. School of Library and Information Science News, Indiana University. Available at: http://www. slis.indiana.edu/news/story.php?story_id=364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonea, Sorin (1992). “Half of the living world was unable to communicate for about one billion years”. In: Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991, T.A. Sebeok and J. Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), 375–392. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, Paul Vincent, (1994). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett. Includes a complete translation of Ockham’s discussion of universals from Sent. I.2.4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckner, Cornelius (2004): Environmental misfit in vision and grasp. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 4, Charles University, Prague. June 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepanov, Yuri S. (1971). Semiotika. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik (1992). “Categorical perception as a general prerequisite to the formation of signs”. In: Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991, T.A. Sebeok and J. Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), 427–454. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. (2000). “Mereology and semiotics”. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. (2002). “Recollections”. In Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi and Stjernfelt, Frederik (eds). Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. Tartu: Tartu University Press. pp. 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky, Edwina. (1998). Architectonics Of Semiosis (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky, Edwina. (2001a). The internal and the external semiosic properties of reality, from http://www.library.utoronto.ca/see/SEED/Vol1-1/Taborsky-Journal1.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky, Edwina. (2001b). “What is a sign?” Journal of Literary Semantics, 30(2), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, Rene (1989) Structural Stability and Morphogenesis an Outline of a General Theory of Models. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D’Arcy Wentworth (1917). On Growth and Form. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, Edward. L. (1898). “Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals”. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplements, No. 8. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tochon, François V. (2000). “Review of The Swiss Pioneer in Nonverbal Communication Studies: Heini

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger (1908–1992) by Thomas A. Sebeok”. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, Volume 3, Number 1, pp. 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trolle Borup, Mia (nee Krause, Mia) (2005) Genotype-phenotype relations. On the modeling of biological phenomena in genetics and molecular biology. Doctoral Dissertation, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turovski, Aleksei. (2000). “The semiotics of animal freedom”. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umerez, Jon (2001). “Howard Pattee’s theoretical biology: a radical epistemological stance to approach life, evolution and complexity” Biosystems. Vol 60, pp. 159–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, Francisco J.; Maturana, Humberto R.; & Uribe, R. (1974). “Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model”. Biosystems 5 187–196.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vehkavaara, Tommi. (2002). “Why and how to naturalize semiotic concepts for biosemiotics”. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1), pp. 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehkavaara, Tommi. (2003). “Natural self-interest, interactive representation, and the emergence of objects and Umwelt: An outline of basic semiotic concepts for biosemiotics”. Sign Systems Studies 31 (2), pp. 547–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehkavaara, Tommi. (forthcoming). “Limitations on applying Peircean semeiotic”. Journal of Biosemiotics. (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, Alessandro E.P. (2005). The Neuro-Heuristic paradigm. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, Heinz (1982) Observing Systems. Intersystems Publications. von Glasersfeld, Ernst (1987) Construction of Knowledge. Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. (1905). Leitfaden in das Studium der Experimentellen Biologie der Wassertiere. Weisbaden: J.F. Bergmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Julius Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. (1926). Theoretical Biology. Trans. By D.L. Mackinnon. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. (1928). Theoretische Biologie (Second Edition.) Berlin: Julius Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. (1934 /1992). “A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds”. in Semiotica 89(4), 319–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. (1940 /1982). “The theory of meaning”. Semiotica, 42(1), 25–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Thure. (1986). Medicine and Semiotics. Semiotica 61:201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, Conrad Hal, 1905–1975, ed. Towards a theoretical biology. An IUBS Symposium. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co. 1968–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Andreas. (2001). “Cognition as expression: The autopoetic foundations of an aesthetic theory of nature”. Sign Systems Studies, 29(1), 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Bruce & Deacon, Terrence. (2000). “Thermodynamic cycles, developmental systems, and emergence”. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 7(1), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzany, Günther (2000) Life: The Communicative Structure. A New Philosophy Of Biology. Norderstedt: Libri Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Maricela and Madl, Pierre (2005). Semiosis aspects of ecosystems of the invasive Caulerpa taxifolia. Paper Presented at the International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference 5, Urbino University, Italy. July 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemke, Tom (2003). “Robosemiotics and embodied enactive cognition”. Semiosis, Energy, Evolution And Development Journal (3), p. 112–124:

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemke, Tom and Sharkey, Noel (2001). “A stroll through the worlds of robots and men: Applying Jakob von Uexkull’s theory of meaning to adaptive robots and artificial life”. Semiotica 134 (1/4): 701–746.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Scholars Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Donald Favareau

Authors
  1. Donald Favareau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ferrara, Italy

    Marcello Barbieri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Favareau, D. (2008). The Evolutionary History of Biosemiotics. In: Barbieri, M. (eds) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation