Abstract
Guidelines for ciliate descriptions are not available. Thus, the chaos prevails. Some put the diagnosis ahead, others banish it to the end of the paper; some describe the "silver features" first, others put them behind the in vivo observations; some use prosa style, others preper telegramese style, and so on. In our opinion, this bewildering situation, partially caused by inexperienced or very individual journal editors, can be ordered by looking beyound the narrow protozoological borders and adopting the style used by experienced taxonomists from other fields (MAYR 1975). Then, for instance, it becomes clear that telegramese style should be used and species description should commence with a concise "diagnosis" separatin it from the nearest relaives = containing only or mainly those features needed to make a key.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foissner, W., Xu, K. (2007). Systematic Section. In: Monograph of the Spathidiida (Ciliophora, Haptoria). Monographiae Biologicae, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4735-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4735-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4210-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4735-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
