Abstract
Natural disasters are complex phenomena, the causes of which lie to a large extent in human behavior that creates vulnerable communities. In order to reduce vulnerability and thereby mitigate the risk of disasters, it is important to consider underlying values, particularly with respect to how people view and interact with the natural world. Advancing an interdisciplinary, ecological paradigm, this paper argues that disaster mitigation needs to be addressed through a process that results in a greater emphasis on our interactions with and reliance upon the natural world, and the development of community resilience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, M.B.: 2000, Vulnerability to Disaster and Sustainable Development: A General Framework for Assessing Vulnerability, in Piekle and Piekle (eds.), Storms, Vol. 1, New York, Routledge, pp. 10–25.
Benoît, R., Simon, F. and Rousselle, J.: 2003, The Effectiveness of Flood Damage Reduction Measures in the Montreal Region, Natural Hazards.
Berkes, F.: 1999, ‘Sacred ecology’, Traditional Knowledge and Resource Management, Philadelphia and London, Taylor and Francis.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and Wisner, B.: 1994, At Risk — Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disaster, London, Routledge.
Booth, A.L. and Jacobs, H.M.: 1993, ‘Ties that Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation for Environmental Consciousness’, in S.J. Armstrong and R.G. Botzler (eds.), Environmental Ethics: Divergence and Convergence, New York, McGraw-Hill, pp. 519–526.
Brown, D.W., Moin, S.M.A. and Nicolson, M.L.: 1997, ‘A comparison of flooding in Michigan and Ontario:’ soft’ data to support’ soft’ water management approaches’, Canadian Water Resources Journal 22(2), 125–139.
Brunk, C.: 1993, ‘Technological risk and the nuclear safety debate’, Proceedings from a Workshop, Ottawa, Ontario, Institute for Research on Environmental and Economy, October 1–2, 1993.
Burby, R.J.: 2001, ‘Flood insurance and flood plain management: The US experience’, Environmental Hazards 3, 111–122.
Burton, I., Kates, R. and White, G.: 1993, Environment as Hazard, 2nd edition, New York, The Guilford Press.
Callicott, J.B.: 1994, Earth’s Insights: A Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
China Online: 2003, http://www.chinaonline.com/refer/ministry_profiles/threegorgesdam.asp, accessed July 7, 2003.
Devall, B. and Sessions, G.: 1985, Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered, Salt Lake City, Peregrine Smith Books.
Dore, M.H.I.: 2003, ‘Forecasting the conditional probabilities of natural disasters in Canada as a guide for disaster preparedness’, Natural Hazards 29(2–3), 249–269.
Doxiadis, C.A.: 1968, Ekistics: An Introduction to the Science of Human Settlements, New York, Oxford University Press.
Environment Canada: 2003, http://www.mb.ec.gc.ca/nature/whp/ramsar/df02s06.en.html, accessed July 7, 2003.
Environment Canada: 2002, Science and Environment Bulletin, Issue No. 32, September/October 2002. Also available at http://www.ec.gc.ca/science.
Etkin, D.A.: 1999, ‘Risk transference and related trends: Driving forces towards more mega-disasters’, Environmental Hazards 1, 69–75.
Gelman, O. and Santiago, M.: 1984, ‘Toward a conceptual framework for interdisciplinary disaster research’, in Ekistics 309, 507–510.
Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds.): 2001, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 507.
Hardin, G.: 1968, ‘Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162, 1243–1248.
Havlick, S.W.: 1984, ‘The urgency of accelerated application of natural hazards research findings in human settlements’, Ekistics 308, 398–405.
Haudenosaunee Environmental Task Force: 1992, Words that Come Before All Else: Environmental Philosophies of the Haudenosaunee, Haudenosanunee Task Force.
Hewitt, K.: 1997, Regions of Risk — A Geographical Introduction to Disasters, England, Longman, p. 389.
Hoffman, S.: 1998, ‘Eve and adam among the embers: Gendered patterns after the oakland berkeley firestorm’, in Enarson and Morrow, The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women’s Eyes, Florida, Florida International University, pp. 55–62.
Holling, C.S. and Gunderson, L.H.: 2002, ‘Resilience and adaptive cycles’, in L.H. Gunderson and C.S. Holling (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, pp. 25–62.
IFRC: 2001, World Disasters Report: Focus on Recovery, Bloomfield, CT, Kumarian Press Inc.
IMF: 2003, The IMF’s Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/prgf.htm, accessed July 10, 2003.
Klein, J.T.: 1990, Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice, Detroit, Wayne State University Press.
Larson, L. and Plasencia, D.: 2001, ‘No adverse impact: New direction in floodplain management policy’, Natural Hazards Review 2(4), 157–181.
Leman, A.B.: 1980, ‘Human settlements: Framework for disaster assessment’, Housing Science 4(6).
Leopold, A.: 1949, A Sand County Almanac with Other Essays on Conservation from Round River, Reprinted in 1981, New York, Oxford University Press.
Mileti, D.: 1999, Disasters by Design — A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Washington, Joseph Henry Press.
Mitchell, J.K.: 1999, ‘Natural disasters in the context of mega-cities’, in J.K. Mitchell (ed.), Crucibles of Hazard: Mega-Cities and Disasters in Transition, New York, United Nations University.
Molles, M.C., Jr.: 1999, Ecology: Concepts and Applications, New York, McGraw-Hill.
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration: 2003, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, NOAA web site, http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hrd_sub/modification.html, accessed Jan 23, 2003.
O’Brien, M.: 2000, Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, in association with the Environmental Research Foundation.
Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P.C., Stonich, S. and Wever, E.U. (eds.): 2002, ‘The Drama of the Commons’, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, pp. 521.
Stefanovic, I.L.: 2000, Safeguarding Our Common Future: Rethinking Sustainable Development, Albany, NY, State University of New York Press.
Stefanovic, I.L.: 2003, ‘The contribution of philosophy to hazards assessment and decision making’, Natural Hazards 28(2–3), 229–247.
White, G.: 1999, ‘A conversation with Gilbert F. White’, Environmental Hazards 1, 53–56.
White, G., Kates, R.W. and Burton, I.: 2001, ‘Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management’, Environmental Hazards 3, 81–92.
Worster, D.: 1985, Nature’s Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
WMO: 1995, ‘Meeting of experts to review the present status of hail suppression’, World Meteorological Organization, WMP Report No. 26, Golden Gate Highlands National Park, South Africa, WMO/TD No. 764.
World Bank: 2002, Leadership Capacity Building for Post Conflict Reconstruction, http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/B-SPAN/sub_leadership_postconflict.htm, accessed July 10, 2003.
Wynne, B.: 1992, ‘Uncertainty and environmental learing: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’, Global Environmental Change 2(2), 111–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Etkin, D., Stefanovic, I.L. (2005). Mitigating Natural Disasters: The Role of Eco-Ethics. In: Haque, C.E. (eds) Mitigation of Natural Hazards and Disasters: International Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4514-X_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4514-X_7
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3112-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4514-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)