Skip to main content

STUDYING COLLEGE ACCESS AND CHOICE: A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL MODEL

  • Chapter
HIGHER EDUCATION:

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 21))

  • 9112 Accesses

Abstract

The student financial aid programs that were authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act were intended to ensure that inadequate financial resources would not limit access to college. Nonetheless, despite substantial investment in student financial aid not only by the federal government but also by state governments, colleges and universities, and other entities, college access and choice remain stratified by socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity. Although students received about $122 billion in financial aid from all sources in 2003–04 (The College Board, 2004), individuals with low family incomes, individuals whose parents have not attended college, African-Americans, and Hispanics are less likely than other individuals to enroll in college. When they do enroll, these groups are concentrated in lower price institutions, such as public two-year colleges and less selective four-year colleges and universities (Baum and Payea, 2004; Ellwood and Kane, 2000; National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2003, 2004; Thomas and Perna, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adelman, C. (2002). The relationship between urbanicity and educational outcomes. In W.G. Tierney and L.S. Hagedorn (eds.), Increasing Access to College: Extending Possibilities for All Students (pp. 35–64). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the Tool Box: Academic Intensity, Attendance Patterns, and Bachelor’s Degree Attainment. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2002). Empty Promises: The Myth of College Access in America. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery C., and Hoxby, C.M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It (pp. 239–302). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, C., and Kane, T.J. (2004). Student perceptions of college opportunities: The Boston COACH Program. In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, andHow to Pay for It (pp. 355–394). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., and Payea, K. (2004). Education Pays 2004: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. Washington, DC: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 70(5): 9–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, WE. (2004). Omitted variables and sample selection in studies of college-going decisions. In E.P. St. John (ed.), Public Policy and College Access: Investigating the Federal and State Roles in Equalizing Postsecondary Opportunity (Vol. 19, pp. 65–86). New York: AMS Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M.C., and Kostal, T. (2002). Financial resources, regulation, and enrollment in US public higher education. Economics of Education Review 21: 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, PJ. (1996). Urban students, liminality, and the postindustrial context. Sociology of Education 69: 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, J.R. (1996). What do students know about wages? Evidence from a survey of undergraduates. Journal of Human Resources 31: 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J.C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1997). Investment in Learning: The Individual and Social Value of American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A.E, and La Nasa, S.M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America’s disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education 42: 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A.E, and La Nasa, S.M. (2000). Three critical tasks America’s disadvantaged face on their path to college. In A.E Cabrera and S.M. La Nasa (eds.), Understanding the col lege choice of disadvantaged students (Vol. 107, pp. 23–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camevale, A.P., and Desrochers, D.M. (2003). Standards for What? The Economic Roots of K-16 Reform. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catsiapis, G. (1987). A model of educational investment decisions. Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceja, M.A. (2001). Applying, Choosing, and Enrolling in Higher Education: Understanding the College Choice Process of First-Generation Chicana Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D.W. (1981). A model of student college choice. The Journal of Higher Education 52(5): 490–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. (2004). Comment. In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It (pp. 97–100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The College Board. (2004). Trends in Student aid 2004. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLarge, M.P. (2003). African American High School Students from Low Income Families and Their Decision Making Process to Participate in Higher Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, S.L., Ahlburg, D.A., and McCall, B.P. (in press). An integrated model of application, admission, enrollment and financial aid. The Journal of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, S.L., and Toutkoushian, R.K. (2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 20, pp. 191–240). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dika, S.L., and Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 72: 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., and Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology 90: 1231–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, J., and Manski, C.F. (1996). Eliciting student expectations of the returns to schooling. Journal of Human Resources 31: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2004). The new merit aid. In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It (pp. 63–100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D.T., and Kane, T.J. (2000). Who is getting a college education? Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In S. Danziger and J. Waldfogel (eds.), Securing the Future: Investing in Children from Birth to College (pp. 283–324). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatima, N., and Paulsen, M.B. (2004). Higher education and state workforce productivity in the 1990s. Thought and Action: NEA Higher Education Journal 20(1): 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B. (2004). Federal financial aid and college access. In E.P. St. John (ed.), Public Policy and College Access: Investigating the Federal and State Roles in Equalizing Postsecondary Opportunity (Vol. 19, pp. 1–28). New York: AMS Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C.E. (2004). Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women: 2004. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2005–016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K. (1997). Increasing African Americans’ participation in higher education: African American high-school students’ perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education 68(5): 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, E.E, Cook, T.D., Eccles, J., Elder, G. H., and Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to Make It: Urban Families and Adolescent Success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., and Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational Research: Introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladieux, L., and Swail, W.S. (1999). Financial aid is not enough: Improving the odds for minority and low-income students. In J.E. King (ed.), Financing a College Education: How it Works, how It’s Changing (pp. 177–197). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonz´lez, K.P., Stone, C, andjovel, J.E. (2003). Examining the role of social capital in access to college for Latinas: Toward a college opportunity framework. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 2: 146–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodsky E., and Jones, M. (2004). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, F.A., and Hossler, D. (1996). Diverse information-gathering methods in the postsecondary decision-making process. Review of Higher Education 19(2): 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, F.A., and Stage, EK. (2004). College predisposition at high-minority enrollment, low-income schools. Review of Higher Education 27(2): 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, L., and Bonstead-Bruns, M. (1998). Parent-child differences in educational expec tations and the academic achievement of immigrant and native students. Sociology of Education 71(3): 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J.C. (1988). Attendance at higher-cost colleges: Ascribed, socioeconomic, and academic influences on student enrollment patterns. Economics of Education Review 7: 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J.C. (1984). The relative roles of academic, ascribed, and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociology of Education 57: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J.C., Griswold, C.P., and Marine, G.M. (1996). Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education 37(3): 241–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D.E. (2004). NCES Research on college participation: A critical analysis. In E.P. St. John (ed.), Public Policy and College Access: Investigating the Federal and State Roles in Equalizing Postsecondary Opportunity (Vol. 19, pp. 29–64). New York: AMS Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D.E. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment. Review of Higher Education 23(1): 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D.E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman. The Journal of Higher Education 68: 624–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S.L., Boisjoly J., and Duncan, G.J. (1998). Parents’ extrafamilial resources and children’s school attainment. Sociology of Education 71: 246–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, C.L., and Flores, S.M. (2003). Percent Plans in College Admissions : A Comparative Analysis of Three States’ Experiences. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.J. (1998). Confronting the Odds: Students at Risk and the Pipeline to Higher Education. Report No. NCES 98–094. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, E.M. (2001). Understanding equity and access in higher education: The potential contribution of Pierre Bourdieu. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 16, pp. 158–171). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Braxton, J., and Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. V, pp. 231–288). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., and Gallagher, K.S. (1987). Studying college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policy-makers. College and University 2: 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Schmit, J., and Vesper, N. (1999). Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., and Stage, F.K. (1992). Family and high school experience influences on the postsecondary educational plans of ninth-grade students. American Educational Research Journal 29: 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., and Vesper, N. (1993). An exploratory study of the factors associated with parental saving for postsecondary education. The Journal of Higher Education 64(2): 140–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C.M. (2004). Introduction. In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It (pp. 1–12). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S., Inkelas, K.K., Briggs, C., and Rhee, B.S. (1997). Differences in college access and choice among racial/ethnic groups: Identifying continuing barriers. Research in Higher Education 38(1): 43–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, S., and Hartle, T. (1998). Too Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: What the Public Thinks and Knows About Paying for College. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerwahr, J. (2003). With Diploma in Hand: Hispanic High School Seniors Talk About Their Future. Report No. National Center Report #03–2. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, and Public Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T., and Spizman, L.M. (1994). Race, financial aid awards, and college attendance: Parents and geography matter. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53(1): 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T.J. (1999). The Price of Admission: Rethinking How Americans Pay for College. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, G., and Tienda, M. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education 106: 349–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirst, M.W, and Bracco, K.R. (2004). Bridging the great divide: How the K-12 and postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it. In M.E. Kirst and A. Venezia (eds.), From High School to College: Improving Opportunities for Success in Postsecondary Education (pp. 1–30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., and Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory 6: 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L.L. and Brinkman, P.T. (1988). The Economic Value of Higher Education. New York: American Council on Education, MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001a). Building a network theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, and R.S. Burt (eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research (pp. 3–29). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001b). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B.T. (2004a). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics 121: 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, B.T. (2004b). The impact of federal tax credits for higher education expenses. In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It (pp. 101–168). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M.C. (2004c). College applications and the effect of affirmative action. Journal of Econometrics 121(1–2): 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. (1999). Information and inner city educational attainment. Economics of Education Review 18(1): 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C.E (1993). Dynamic choice in social settings. Journal of Econometrics 58(1–2): 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C.F., and Wise, D. (1983). College Choice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., and Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McColloch, S.K. (1990). The financial planning gap. Journal of College Admissions 127: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P.M. (1997). Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P.M., Antonio, A.L., and Trent, J.W. (1997). Black students, Black colleges: An African American college choice model. Journal for a]ust and Caring Education 3: 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P.M., Nuñez, A.M., Ceja, M., and Solorzano, D. (2004). Building models of Latino/a’s college choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, R.B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science, achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces 78(1): 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintrop, H., Milton, TH., Schmidtlein, F.A., and MacLellan, A.M. (2004). K-16 reform in Maryland: The first steps. In M.E. Kirst and A. Venezia (eds.), From High School to College: Improving Opportunities for Success in Postsecondary Education (pp. 220–251). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V (1999). Conceptualising social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. Sociological Review 47(4): 744–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortenson, T. (2001 April). Trends in college participation by family income: 1970 to 1999. Postsecondary Education Opportunity. Mortenson Research Seminar on Public Policy, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2001 and Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, DC: Author (NCES 2004–155).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Digest of Education Statistics 2003. Washington, DC: Author (NCES 2005–025).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2004). Measuring Up 2004. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Dialogue on Student Financial Aid. (2003). Challenging Times, Clear Choices: An Action Agenda for College Access and Success. Washington, DC: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, A. (2004). The role of habitus and cultural capital in choosing a college, transitioning from high school to higher education and persisting in college among minority and nonminority students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 3(2): 180–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L., and Rosenfeld, R.A. (1984). Parents and the process of gaining access to student financial aid. The Journal of Higher Education 55(4): 455–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. (1990). College Choice: Understanding Student Enrollment Behavior. Report No. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M.B. (1996a). Higher education and productivity: An afterword. Thought and Action: NBA Higher Education Journal 12(2): 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M.B. (1996b). Higher education and state workforce productivity. Thought and Action: NEA Higher Education Journal 12(1): 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M.B. (2001a). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In M.B. Paulsen and J.C. Smart (eds.), The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice (pp. 55–94). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M.B. (2001b). The economics of the public sector: The nature and role of public policy in the finance of higher education. In M.B. Paulsen and J.C. Smart (eds.), The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice (pp. 95–132). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M.B., and St. John, E.P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education 73(2): 189–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W. (2005). The benefits of higher education: Sex, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic group differences. Review of Higher Education, 29, 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W. (2004a). The key to college access: A college preparatory curriculum. In W.G. Tierney Z.B. Corwin, and J.E. Colyar (eds.), Preparing for College: Nine Elements of Effective Outreach (pp. 113–134). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W. (2004b). Understanding the decision to enroll in graduate school: Sex and racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education 75(5): 487–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W. (2004c). Impact of Student Aid Program Design, Operations, and Marketing on the Formation of Family College-Going Plans and Resulting College-Going Behaviors of Potential Students. Boston, MA: The Education Resources Institute, Inc. (TERI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W. (2003). The private benefits of higher education: An examination of the earnings premium. Research in Higher Education 44 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W. (2000). Differences in the decision to enroll in college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. The Journal of Higher Education 71(2): 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W, Steele, P., Woda, S., and Hibbert, T. (2005). State public policies and the racial/ethnic stratification of college access and choice in the state of Maryland. Review of Higher Education 28(2): 245–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W, and Titus, M. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education 76(5): 485–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L.W, and Titus, M. (2004). Understanding differences in the choice of college attended: The role of state public policies. Review of Higher Education 27(4): 501–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, S.B., and Jordan, W.J. (2001). Effects of information, guidance, and actions on postsecondary destinations: A study of talent loss. American Educational Research Journal 38(4): 947–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modem sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, C.E. (1994). What to do after high school: The two-year versus four-year college enrollment decision. In R.G. Ehrenberg (ed.), Choices and Consequences: Contemporary Policy Issues in Education (pp. 59–88). New York: IRL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., and Stevenson, D. (1999). The Ambitious Generation: America’s Teenagers, Motivated But Directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W.H., Hauser, R.M., and Wolf, W.C. (1986). Sex, schooling and occupational status. American Journal of Sociology 86: 551–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, E.K., and Hossler, D. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education 30(3): 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Salazar, R.D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socializa tion of racial minority children and youth. Harvard Educational Review 67: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Salazar, R.D., and Dornbusch, S.M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education 68: 116–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D.L., Schiller, K.S., and Schneider, B. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education 67: 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P. (2004). Public policy and research on college access: Lessons learned from NCES research and state evaluation studies. In E.P. St. John (ed.), Public Policy and College Access: Investigating the Federal and State Roles in Equalizing Postsecondary Opportunity (pp. 181–196). New York: AMS Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P. (2003). Refinancing the College Dream: Access, Equal Opportunity, and Justice for Taxpayers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P. (1991). What really influences minority attendance? Sequential analysis of the high school and beyond sophomore cohort. Research in Higher Education 32:141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P., and Asker, E.H. (2001). The role of finances in student choice: A review of theory and research. In M.B. Paulsen and J.C. Smart (eds.), The Finance of Higher Edu cation: Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice (pp. 419–438). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P, Chung, G.G., Musoba, G.D., and Simmons, A.B. (2004). Financial access: The impact of state finance strategies. In E.P. St. John (ed.), Public Policy and College Access: Investigating the Federal and State Roles in Equalizing Postsecondary Opportunity (pp. 109–130). New York: AMS Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P, Musoba, G.D., and Chung, G.G. (2004). Academic access: The impact of state education policies. In E.P. St. John (ed.), Public Policy and College Access: Investigating the Federal and State Roles in Equalizing Postsecondary Opportunity (pp. 131–152). New York: AMS Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P, and Noell, J. (1989). The effects of student financial aid on access to higher education: An analysis of progress with special consideration of minority enrollments. Research in Higher Education 30: 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P, and Paulsen, M.B. (2001). The finance of higher education: Implications for theory, research, policy, and practice. In M.B. Paulsen and J.C. Smart (eds.), The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice (pp. 545–568). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P, Paulsen, M.B., and Carter, D.F. (2005). Diversity, college costs, and postsecondary opportunity: An examination of the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education 76(5): 545–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P.T., Cabrera, A.F., and Bernai, E.M. (2001). Swimming Against the Tide: The Poor in American Higher Education. Report No. 2001–1. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S.L., and Perna, L.W. (2004). The opportunity agenda: A reexamination of postsecondary reward and opportunity. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education:

    Google Scholar 

  • Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 19, pp. 43–84). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom´s Rivera Policy Institute at University of Southern California. (2004). Caught in the Financial Aid Information Divide: A National Survey of Latino Perspectives on Financial Aid. Reston, VA: The Sallie Mae Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky L.G., Cutler, R., and Lee, J. (2002). College Knowledge: What Latino Parents Need to Know and Why They Don’t Know It. Claremont, CA: The Tom´s Rivera Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.E. (2004). Going to college and finishing college: Explaining different educa tional outcomes. In C.M. Hoxby (ed.), College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It (pp. 13–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Accounting Office. (1990). Higher Education: Gaps in Parents’ and Students’ Knowledge of School Costs and Federal Aid. GAO/PEMD-90–20BR. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezia, A., Kirst, M.W., and Antonio, A.L. (2003). Betraying the College Dream: How Dis connected K-12 and Postsecondary Education Systems Undermine Student Aspirations. Stanford, CA: The Bridge Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, W.C. (1994). Transition from consideration of a college to the decision to apply. Research in Higher Education 35(6): 631–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. (2003). Knocking at the College Door: Projections of High School Graduates by State, Income, and Race/Ethnicity, 1988 to 2018. Boulder, CO: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G.C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchies, and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13(1): 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarate, M.E., and Gallimore, R.G. (2004). Gender differences in factors leading to college enrollment: A longitudinal analysis of Latina and Latino students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perna, L.W. (2006). STUDYING COLLEGE ACCESS AND CHOICE: A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL MODEL. In: Smart, J.C. (eds) HIGHER EDUCATION:. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics