Skip to main content

Educational Change: Easier Said than Done

  • Chapter

Abstract

In the opening chapter to this section of the Handbook, Fink and Stoll review the contemporary field of educational change and ask why educational change is so difficult to understand and achieve in present times. They begin by discussing the historical, social and organizational forces that create continuity in education; which sustain structures and practices that in many cases may be outliving their usefulness. They then discuss four common and widely used approaches to bringing about educational change in the face of such continuity: school effectiveness, school improvement, school restructuring, and more recent orientations to school reculturing. Each of these approaches is examined clearly and also critically.

Finally, Fink and Stoll turn to a number of agendas which they argue will continue to challenge the theory and practice of educational change in years to come — the need for a tighter connection between organizational change and developing better approaches to teaching and learning; the problem of motivating students in contexts of economic uncertainty; the difficulty of determining what kinds of leadership work best and are most practical in contexts of great complexity; the perennial problem of assessment and accountability; the relationship of change to teachers’ lives, and the importance of micropolitics. Reculturing, they propose, offers one of the most hopeful ways of providing an integrated solution to these many different challenges.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and texts. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. & Teitelbaum, K. (1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 177–184.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1987). Micropolitics of the school. London: Methuen/Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1981). Beachside comprehensive: A case-study of secondary schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Goodson, I. (1985). Understanding teachers: Concepts and contexts. In S. Ball and I. Goodson (Eds), Teachers’ lives and careers. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (1992). Education and the teacher unions. London: Cassell

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M., & Robertson, H. (1994). Class warfare. Toronto: Key Porter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents and principals can make the difference. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascia N. (1994). Unions in teachers’ lives: Social intellectual and practical concerns. New York: Teachers’ College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, C., & Chitty, C. (1996). Thirty years on: Is comprehensive education alive and well or struggling to survive? London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myth, fraud, and the attack on America’s schools. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P., & Mulford, W. (1996). Empowerment in four Australian primary schools: They don’t really care. International Journal of Educational Reform, 5(2), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J. (1988). The teachers’ political orientation vis a vis the princial: The micropolitics of the school. Politics of Education Association Yearbook: 1988, pp. 113–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. (1995). Minister called dishonest. The Spectator, 13 February, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouilette, L. (1996). A geology of school reform: The successive restructuring of a school district. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1995). School effectiveness research: The policy-maker’s tool for school improvement? European Educational Research Association Bulletin, 1(1), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Burnout testing for the validity, replication, and invarience of causal structure across the elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 645–673.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., & Spinks, J. (1988). The self-managing school. Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J, Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington D. C: National Center for Educational Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, T., & Goetz, M. (1995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again and again and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. (1983). Culture and school performance. Educational Leadership, 40(5), 140–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1–12.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1993). Post capitalist society. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. (1995). School improvement and OFSTED inspection: The research evidence. In P. Earley, B. Fidler & J. Ouston (Eds), Improvement through inspection?: Complementary approaches to school development. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. (1994). School governing bodies: Making progress? Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1996). School effectiveness research and its critics: Alternative visions of schooling. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(2), 199–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. (1995). Structural reform in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, D. (1992). Invitational leadership. In J. Novak (Ed.), Advances in invitational theory. San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, C., & Williams, W. (1985). Schools on trial: The trials of the democratic comprehensives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1996a). Turning systematic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 420–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1996b). Broadening the concept of teacher leadership. In National Staff Development Council, New directions. Oxford, OH: NSDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1993) Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for in your school? Toronto: Ontario Public School Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel models in educational and social research (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., & Myers, K. (1996). Freedom of information: Towards a code of ethics for performance indicators. Research Intelligence: British Educational Research Association Newsletter, 57(July), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., & Thomas, S. (1996). Using examination results as indicators of school and college performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 159, 149–163.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F. (1981). Life history and the study of schooling. Interchange, 11, 62–76.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., Jesson, D., & Sime, N. (1986). The search for a fairer way of comparing schools’ examination results. Research Papers in Education, 1(2), 91–122.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1994). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavson, C. G. (1955). A preface to history. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328–355.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. (1996). Peddling feel-good fictions. Forum, 38(2), 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1994). The empty rain coat: Making sense of the future. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1996). Cultures of teaching and educational change. In Biddle, B., Good, T., & Goodson, I. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching. The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H., & Hopkins, D. (1991). The empowered school: The management and practice of development planning. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 23–46.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, N. (1996). Intensive pre-school: Key to higher I.Q. Times Educational Supplement, February 16, p.16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsby, G., & McCulloch, G. (in press). Teachers and the national curriculum. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsby, G., & McCulloch, G. (1996). Teacher professionalism and curriculum control. In I. F. Goodson, & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1993). The lives of teachers. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C.S., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Micholson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. R. (1991). The doors to school improvement. Educational Leadership, 14(3), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI.: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W. (1991). Understanding teaching. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J., McCaig, E., & Thomson, W. (1992). Making school boards work. Glasgow: SOED, Jordanhill College.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGilcrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J., & Beresford, C. (1995). Planning matters: The impact of development planning in primary schools. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L. M., & Pascal, A. H. (1988). Teachers’ unions and educational reform. Washington, D. C.: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning. Palo Alto: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand change agent study: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechlenberg, J. A. (1992). The braking of the break-the-mold express. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(4), 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, M. H. (1990). Real school: A universal drama amid disparate experience. In D. E. Mitchell & M. E. Metz (Eds.), Education politics for the new century. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., & Morgan, K. (1992). Beyond the glitterspeak. Toronto: Ontario Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P. (1991). The nature and findings on school effectiveness in the primary sector. In S. Riddell & S. Brown (Eds), School effectiveness research: Its message for school improvement. Edinburgh: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset: Open Books (Reprinted 1994, London: Paul Chapman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1986). The junior school project: Main report. London: Research and Statistics Branch, Inner London, Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (1992). School effectiveness and school restructuring: Contributions to educational improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(2), 90–109.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K. (1995). Intensive care for the chronically sick. Paper presented to the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Education. (1996). Success against the odds: Effective schools in disadvantaged areas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Education. (1995). Learning to succeed: The way ahead. London: National Commission on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, D. L. N. (1992). Add value to league tables. The ISIS Magazine, 4, Spring, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, D., Goldstein, H., Prosser, R., & Rasbash, J. (1989). Differential school effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 769–776.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure social inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R. (1991). A new view of society and other writings. London: Penguin Classics

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The Emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59(January), 1–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. (1996). Turning around ineffective schools: Some evidence and some speculations. In J. Gray, D. Reynolds, C. Fitz-Gibbon, & D. Jesson (Eds.), Merging traditions: The future of research on school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. (1991). Changing ineffective schools. In M. Ainscow (Ed.), Effective schools for all. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. (1988). British school improvement research: The contribution of qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(2), 143–154.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. P. M., Nesselrodt, P. S., Schaffer, E. C., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1994). Advances in school effectiveness research and practice. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds D., Hopkins, D., & Stoll, L. (1993). Linking school effectiveness knowledge and school improvement practice: Towards a synergy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(1), 37–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., & Farrell, S. (1996). World’s apart?: A Review of international surveys of educational achivement involving England. London: HMSO for the Office of Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., & Packer, A. (1992). School effectiveness and school improvement in the 1990s’. In D. Reynolds, & P. Cuttance (Eds.), School Effectiveness: Research Policy and Practice. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and post fordism: Constructing the new professionalism. In I. F. Goodson, & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teacher workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J. (1991). Innovation and change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P., Thomas, S., & Mortimore, P. (1996). Differential school effectiveness: Departmental variations in GCSE attainment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechty, P. (1990). Schools for the twenty first century: Leadership imperatives for educational reform. San Francisco Ca.: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco Ca.: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskin, L. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. (1992). Horace’s school: Redesigning the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. M., Dwyer, D. C., Prunty, J. J., & Kleine, P. F. (1987). The fate of an innovative school. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (1991). International perspectives on teacher collegiality: A labour process discussion based on the concept of teachers’ work. British Journal of Sociology in Education, 12(3), 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (1995). Managing chaos. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. M. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L. (1996). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement: Issues and possibilities. In J. Gray, D. Reynolds, C. Fitz-Gibbon, & D. Jessop (Eds.), Merging traditions: The future of school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1998). The cruising school: The unidentified ineffective school. In L. Stoll, & K. Myers (Eds.), Schools in difficulty: No quick fixes. Chichester: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1994). Voices from the field. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(2), 149–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1992). Effective school change: The Halton approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 19–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Myers, K. (Eds.). (1998). Schools in difficulty: No quick fixes. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, D. (1993). A nation truly at risk. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(4), 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., Wimpelberg, R., & Kirby, P. (1989). Contextual differences in models for effective schooling. In B. P. M. Creemers, T. Peters, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), School effectiveness and school improvement. Proceedings of the second international congress, Rotterdam. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The grammer of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Velzen, W., Miles, M., Eckholm, M., Hameyer, U., & Robin, D. (1985). Making school improvement work. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1994). Towards a contingency approach to development planning in schools. In D. Hargreaves, & D, Hopkins (Eds.), Development planning for school improvement. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fink, D., Stoll, L. (2005). Educational Change: Easier Said than Done. In: Hargreaves, A. (eds) Extending Educational Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4453-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics