Skip to main content

Organizational Learning and Educational Change

  • Chapter

Abstract

The avant-garde of educational change theory is the idea that schools be treated and developed as learning organizations which do not pursue fixed plans in pursuit of set goals, but structure and develop themselves so that they and their members can continually learn from experience, from each other and from the world around them, so that they can solve problems and improve on a continuous basis.

In this chapter, Mulford takes this field of organizational learning, describes its key principles, discusses some of the research evidence that is beginning to emerge in relation to it; and engages critically with some of the field’s claims and their limitations. Mulford’s chapter is neither blindly euphoric nor sweepingly dismissive of organizational learning theory. Instead of uncritically applying the general theory to education as many other writers and advocates of educational change have done, he presents one of the few critical appraisals of the field and its relevance that have yet been written.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C, & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning. A theory of action perspective. Reading, MASS.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, R., & Cohen, P. (1995). Working wisdom: Timeless skills and vanguard strategies for learning organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., Eisenstat, R., & Spector, B. (1990). The critical path to corporate renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. NY: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P., & Mulford, W. (1996). Empowerment in four primary schools: They don’t really care. International Journal of Educational Reform, 5(2), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W., Crowson, R., & Mawhinney, H. (Eds), (in press). The politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American school. Washington, DC: Falmer Press (The 1995 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredo, E. (1977). Collaborative relations among elementary school teachers. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 300–309.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brundage, D, & MacKeracher, D. (1980). Adult learning principles and their application to program planning. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., Lawrence, A., Peck, F., & Thomas, F. (1994). Leading Victoria’s schools of the future: Base-line survey of principals in 1993. Paper presented at the Seventh International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Melbourne, Victoria, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. (1976). Some consequences of the Radford Scheme for schools, teachers and students in Queensland. Canberra: Australian Government Printer, AACRDE Report Number 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnall, C. (1986). Managing strategic change: An integrated approach. Long-Range Planning, 19(6), 105–115.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Barnes, C. (1993). Conclusion: A new pedagogy for policy? In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert. (Eds.). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 240–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1994). The ordeal of change: A true story of high school reform, Teachers College Record, 96(2), 148–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, B. (June 1994). Understanding organizational learning for educational leadership and school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association for the Study of Educational Administration, Calgary. (To appear in Leithwood, K. (Ed) International handbook of educational leadership and administration. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R., & Boyd, W. (Feb., 1993). Coordinated services for children: Designing arks for storms and seas unknown. American Journal of Education, 101, 141–179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dalin, P., & Rust, V. (1983). Can schools learn? Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan., 76(8), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. (1990). Healing our schools: Restoring the heart. Chapter 7. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now. (Chapter 7). New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBella, A. (1994). The Learning organization: A concept of being or becoming? Paper presented at Eastern Academy of Management, Albany, New York, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, R. (1995). Dynamics of teacher career stages. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 171–192). NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (December 1994). Teachers as leaders. Report to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee and the North Carolina State Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Toronto: Ontario Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspects of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103(4), 377–405.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C. (1990). Open accountability for the 90’s: Between the pillars. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1995). Recapturing the political dimension. In M. Ginsburg (Ed.), The politics of educators’ work and lives. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen, J. (Ed). (1978). Danish case study on evaluation of INSET programmes for teachers. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G., & Loucks, S. (1976). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G., Halland, G., & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (1995). Culture and leadership: Developing an international perspective on educational administration. UCEA Review., 36(2), 1, 4–5, & 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1995). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995. In K. Leithwood (Ed), The international handbook of research on educational leadership and administration. New York: Kluwer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., & Richardson, V. (1995). Effects of the culture in two schools on the process and outcomes of staff development. The Elementary School Journal 95(4), 367–385.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hamstead, X, Ford, J., & Hird, W. (May, 1980). An administrative team development program. Studies in Educational Administration, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1994). The age of paradox. Boston: Havard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1995). Paradoxes of change: School renewal in the postmodern age. Educational Leadership, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 227–241.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1995). Professional careers and professional development: Some intersections. In X Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 193–224). NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, D. (1995). Crises and renewal: Meeting the challenge of organizational change. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1991). Change: Where to begin. Harvard Business Review, 69(4), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. (1995). The learning society in the information age. Toronto: The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Program in Human Development, Working Paper No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirst, M. (1994). A changing context means school board reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 378–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Aitken, R. (in press). Making schools smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1995). An organizational learning perspective on school responses to central policy initiatives. Toronto: OISE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. (1994). New wine in old bottles: The limits of school reformation. Orbit, 25(4), 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. (1994). Beyond managed change: Rethinking how schools improve. School Effectiveness and Improvement, 5(1), 2–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K., Kruse, S., & Associates. (1995). Professionalism and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. (1993). What matters most in teachers’ workplace context? In J. Little & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts. NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. (1994). Strategic sites for teachers’ professional development. In P. Grimmett & J. Neufeld (Eds.), Teacher development in the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change, (pp. 31–51). NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1978). Notes on the structure of educational organizations: Revised version. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Reported in Hannaway, J., Administrative structures why do they grow? Teachers College Record, 79(3), 416–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (1993). 40 years of change in schools: Some personal reflections. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 213–248.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. (1995). Teachers learning together: Organizational learning in an elementary school. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C, & associates. (1976). Organization development (OD): The case of Sheldon High School. London: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (1976). Open education and administrative styles. The Educational Administrator, 7, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (1978). Organisational development in schools: An octet of dilemmas, ACEA Bulletin, 12, and Educational Change and Development, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (1979). Andragogy and some implications for teacher education. ACT Papers on Education. Canberra: Canberra College of Advanced Education [and Canberra Papers in Continuing Education, New Series No. 2, Australian National University, Centre for Continuing Education, 1982].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (1982). Consulting with education systems is about the facilitation of coordinated effort. In H. Gray (Ed.), The management of educational institutions: Theory, research and consultancy. Lewes, Sussex: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (1994). Shaping tomorrow’s schools. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Administration Monograph No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B., Conabere, A., & Keller, J. (1977). Organisational development in schools: Early data on the Australian experience. The Journal of Educational Administration, 15(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B., Fisher, D., & Grady, N. (1991). Educational leadership for quality teaching and learning. In R. Glatter, T. Simkins, & L. Watson (Eds.), Developing educational leaders. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B., Watson, H., & Vallee, J. (1980). Structured experiences and group development. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murninghan, K., & Conlon, E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–186.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. & Beck, L. (1995). School-based management as school reform: Taking stock. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., & Louis, K. (1994). The evolving role of the principal: Some concluding thoughts (Chapter 12). In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Royal Commission on Learning. (1994). For the love of learning. Toronto, Ontario: Publications Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, D. (1977). Survey feedback in four high schools. ACEA Bulletin, 8, 7–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, B., & Rueter, H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammar of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484–510.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on chaos. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (1976). Dynamics of bureaucracy: A case study in education. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R., & Cameron, J. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, J., & Catalanello, R. (1994). Strategic readiness. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, J. (1995). The learning institution: A pathway to real school improvement? Unpublished paper, Centre for School Improvement, University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackney, L., Walker, K., & Hajnal, V. (1 April, 1995). Organizational learning, leadership, and selected factors relating to the institutionalization of school improvement initiatives. A paper for AERA, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning in the 21st century. Working paper #10.011, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Centre for Organizational Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of organizational learning. NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Roberts, C, Ross, R., Smith, B., & Kleiner, A. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, G. (1976). Passages. NY: E. P. Dulton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, G. (1995). New passages: Mapping our lives across time. NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. (1984). Horace’s compromise. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1994). School effectiveness and school improvement: Voices from the field. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(2), 149–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Mortimore, P. (June, 1995). School effectiveness and school improvement. Viewpoint, 2, 1–8. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, F., & Caldwell, B. (1994). Leading Victoria’s Schools of the Future: Some findings from the early stages of reform. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Council for Educational Administration, Melbourne, Victoria, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering towards Utopia: Reflections on a century of public school reform. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systematic change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C, & Cambone, J. (1994). Principals, shared decision making, and school reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 287–301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mulford, B. (2005). Organizational Learning and Educational Change. In: Hargreaves, A. (eds) Extending Educational Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4453-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics