Curriculum Reform, Educational Change and School Improvement

  • Gary Mcculloch

Abstract

In many countries and throughout the modern era of educational change, curriculum innovation has been regarded as an essential strategy for educational reform. Yet, as Gary McCulloch argues in this chapter, the positive impact of planned curriculum reform has been at best equivocal. In reflecting on the recent history of educational change in England and Wales he first considers curriculum reform in relation to the role of schools, and then the changing position of teachers. McCulloch focuses on the different strategies that have been devised to promote curriculum reform in this context and the tensions and contradictions that have developed as a result. In particular, he examines the strategies of ‘independence’ and ‘absorption’ in relation to specific curriculum initiatives in order to assess their relative impact both in terms of educational change and with respect to the more limited aim of school improvement. Later in the chapter he compares the espousal of teacher freedom’ so characteristic of the reforms of the 1960s, with the emphasis on control and accountability in the reforms of the 1990s. McCulloch concludes the chapter by assessing the relative importance of these issues for curriculum reform for school improvement.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, R. (1988). The National Curriculum: A historical perspective. In D. Lawton, & C. Chitty (Eds.), The National Curriculum, Papers 33 (pp. 21–33). Bedford Way, London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, K. (1993). The turbulent years: My life in politics. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, M. (1993). Teachers and the National Curriculum: Learning to love it? In M. Barber, D. Graham (Eds.), Sense, nonsense and The National Curriculum (pp. 10–25). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, M. (31 May, 1996). Why are you still smiling Kenneth, TES.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, C. (1986). The audit of war. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Beare, H., & Lowe Boyd, W. (Eds). (1993). Restructuring schools: An international perspective on the movement to transform the control and performance of schools. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburne, L. (16 September, 1988). Newcomer worries the neighbours. TES.Google Scholar
  8. Bowe, R., & Ball, S. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, D., & O’Neill, M. (Eds.). (1995). Case studies in educational change: An international perspective. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  10. Dale, R. (1989). The Thatcherite project in education: The case of the City Technology Colleges. Critical Social Policy, 27, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dearing, R. (1994). The National Curriculum and its assessment: Final report. London: SCAA.Google Scholar
  12. DES (Department of Education and Science). (1986). A new choice of school: City Technology Colleges. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. DOE / DES (Department of Employment / Department of Education and Science). (1986). Working together — education and training. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  15. Gewirtz, S., Miller, H., & Walford, G. (1991). Parents’ individualist and collectivist strategies at the City Technology College, Kingshurst. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1, 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilroy, P. (1991). The loss of professional autonomy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 17(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodson, I. (1982). School subjects and curriculum change. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  18. Goodson, I. (1988). The Making of curriculum: Collected essays. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Goodson, I. (1994). Studying curriculum. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  20. Hailsham, Lord. (1961). Letter to Sir David Eccles (Minister of Education), 10 February, Ministry of Education papers, Public Record Office, ED. 147/794.Google Scholar
  21. Hailsham, Lord. (1963). Science and politics. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  22. Harland, J. (1987). The TVEI experience: Issues of control, response and the professional role of teachers. In D. Gleeson (Ed.), TVEI and secondary education: A critical appraisal (pp. 38–54). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Helsby, G. (1989). Central control and grassroots creativity: The paradox at the heart of TVEI. In A. Harrison, S. Grettan (Eds.), Education and training UK 1989: An economic, social and policy audit (pp. 77–83). Newbury: Policy Journals.Google Scholar
  24. Helsby, G. & McCulloch, G. (Eds.). (1996). Teachers and the National Curriculum. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  25. Hodges, L. (7 June, 1996). More special than all the rest? (Report). TES.Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, C. (1991). CTCs technology teaching less than satisfactory (Report). The Independent, 18 October.Google Scholar
  27. Jennings, A. (1985). Out of the secret garden. In M. Plaskow (Ed.), Life and death of the schools council (pp. 15–39). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. Joseph, Sir K. (1984). Postscript. Oxford Review Of Education, 10(2), 147–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kerr, J. F. (1968). Changing the curriculum. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lawton, D. (1980). The politics of the school curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. McCulloch, G. (1987a). Curriculum history in England and New Zealand. In I. Goodson (Ed), International perspectives in curriculum history (pp. 297–327). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  32. McCulloch, G. (1987b). History and policy: The politics of the TVEI. In D. Gleeson (Ed.), TVEI and secondary education: A critical appraisal (pp. 13–37). Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. McCulloch, G. (1989a). The secondary technical school: A usable past? London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  34. McCulloch, G. (1989b). City technology colleges: An old choice of school? British Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCulloch, G. (Ed.). (1992). The school curriculum in New Zealand: History, theory, policy and practice. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  36. McCulloch, G. (1994a). Educational reconstruction: The 1944 Education Act and the 21st Century. London: Woburn Press.Google Scholar
  37. McCulloch, G. (1994b). Technical fix? City Technology Colleges. Leeds, University of Leeds School of Education, Education for Capability research group, occasional publication no. 7.Google Scholar
  38. McCulloch, G., Jenkins, E., & Layton, D. (1985). Technological revolution? The politics of school acience and technology in England And Wales since 1945. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  39. Merson, M. (1992). The four ages of TVEI: A review of policy. British Journal of Education and Work, 5(2), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ministry of Education. (1947). The new secondary education (Pamphlet No. 9). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  41. Ministry of Education. (1959). 15 To 18 (Crowther Report). London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  42. Nash, I. (1987). Taking the initiative to the most able students. TES, 4 September.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, D. (1965). Letter to C. Priestley, 9 February, Department of Education and Science papers, Public Record Office, ED. 147/896.Google Scholar
  44. Ribbins, P. (1993). Telling tales of secondary heads: On educational reform and the National Curriculum. In C. Chitty (Ed.), The National Curriculum: Is it working? (pp. 24–79). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  45. Schools Council. (1968). Curriculum innovation in practice: A report by J. Stuart Maclure of the third international curriculum conference, 1967. London: Schools Council.Google Scholar
  46. Schools Council. (1973). Pattern and variation in curriculum development projects. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Simons, H. (1988). Teacher professionalism and the National Curriculum. In D. Lawton & C. Chitty (Eds.), The National Curriculum Papers 33 (pp. 78–90). Bedford Way, London: Institute of Eduction, University of London.Google Scholar
  48. Threatened school. (26 February, 1960). The Times Educational Supplement. (TES), Leading article.Google Scholar
  49. Bring back the DES... (19 November, 1982). TES, Leading article.Google Scholar
  50. 4m. offer to become CTCs. (5 August, 1988a). TES, Report.Google Scholar
  51. Survey reveals classroom resentment and envy. (18 November, 1988b). TES, Report.Google Scholar
  52. Back with the teachers. (11 November, 1994a). TES, Leading article.Google Scholar
  53. High-cost CTCs fall short of excellence. (25 November, 1994b). TES, Lead report.Google Scholar
  54. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Walford, G., & Miller, H. (1991). City Technology College. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Weaver, T. R. (20 February, 1961). Note. Ministry of Education papers, Public Record Office, ED.147/794.Google Scholar
  57. Whitty, G., Edwards, T., & Gewirtz, S. (1993). Specialisation and choice in urban education: The City Technology College experiment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Wiener, M. (1981). English culture and the decline of the industrial spirit, 1850–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wrigley, J. (1985). Confessions of a curriculum man. In M. Plaskow (Ed.), Life and death of the schools council (pp. 41–53). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  60. Young, D. (21 January, 1983). Equipping the young for the real world. Times Higher Education Supplement.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Mcculloch
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations